tag 2000 California Commercial Cost 
Green Car Congress
SEPTEMBER 26, 2009
The California Air Resources Board directed its staff to take steps to provide further locomotive and rail yard emission reductions beyond those achieved by existing US Environmental Protection Agency and state regulations and agreements. Other measures may have potential, but are generally not as cost-effective.
Green Car Congress
NOVEMBER 25, 2009
DOE funding $75,161,246, total project value with cost share $150,322,492). DOE funding $60,280,000, total project value including cost share $120,560,000). Center for the Commercialization of Electric Technologies (TX). DOE funding $13,516,546, total project value including cost share $27,419,424). 29,561,142.
Green Car Congress
MAY 21, 2010
The Canadian oil sands are not alone as a higher GHG source of crude, IHS CERA points out.they are part of a group of higher carbon-intensity crudes consumed within the United States, including Venezuelan heavy crude oil; Nigerian crude oils; and crude oils from mature assets that require steam for enhanced oil recovery such as California heavy oil.
Green Car Congress
SEPTEMBER 23, 2009
O’Brien was speaking at the California Air Resources Board’s ZEV Technology Symposium in Sacramento, California. California first adopted its Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) regulation in 1990 as part of the Low Emission Vehicle Program. Earlier post.). Tom Cackette, ARB Chief Deputy Executive Officer, at the ZEV Symposium.
Tony Karrer Delicious EVdriven
APRIL 21, 2009
Its like having a second fuel tank that you always use first -- only you fill up at home, from a regular outlet, at an equivalent cost of under $1/gallon. Lifetime service costs are lower for a vehicle that is mainly electric. At $3 for a gallon of gas, driving a non-hybrid car costs 8-20 cents/mile (depending on MPG).
Green Car Congress
JANUARY 21, 2010
HRI), which were commercialized with support from the US Department of Energy and industrial clients. billion from 1975-2000 to develop DCL technology. Headwaters says that compared to ICL, the DCL process can result in: 30% lower capital cost for a comparably sized plant. The installed capital cost of this plant is $1.5
Green Car Congress
APRIL 10, 2010
These reductions in power plant emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) and nitrogen oxides (NO x ) were achieved at a significantly lower cost than originally assumed. Today, this cap-and-trade program is considered one of the most efficient and cost-effective environmental initiatives ever implemented. Waxman of California and Edward J.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
170 
Let's personalize your content