Abandoned History: The 2014 VIA VTRUX Pickup, a Forgotten Silverado

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

A brief moment in EV history passed us by about a decade ago, when the little-known VIA Motors introduced their lineup of VTRUX hybrid-electric vehicles. Your author managed to hear absolutely nothing about this brand or its vehicles until a post on Twit-X a couple of weeks ago. This sort of topic is the very reason Abandoned History exists. Let’s learn about the world of VTRUX.

The story begins with a company in Utah called Raser Technologies. In 2009 Raser displayed a Hummer H3 that claimed to return up to 100 miles* on a gallon of fuel (*in local daily driving) when it was outfitted with the company’s range-extender plug-in electric powertrain. Raser went looking for investors and executives, and someone to mass produce their powertrains.


Enter newly retired GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz. Lutz brought with him other investors, as well as executives and engineers from GM. In short order, VIA Motors was established as a separate entity from Raser Technologies in 2010. Lutz joined in 2011, promptly after he retired from GM. The newly established company planned to introduce a whole line of PHEV vehicles, and their industry connection for completed passenger vehicles to convert (Lutz) was already in place.

Lutz was a staunch supporter of GM’s plug-in hybrid of the time, the Cruze-based Volt. The same basic principle was used by the VIA powertrain, and would electrify current General Motors vehicles. VIA saw an opportunity to capitalize on a new electrified vehicle market, while simultaneously taking advantage of proven Chevrolet underpinnings. 


To that end, the VTRUX line was announced circa 2011. Each vehicle would use the VIA plug-in powertrain which turned the existing gas engine into a range extender. Different to the Volt’s operation, all VTRUX models were a series hybrid: There was no mechanical connection between the gas engine and the wheels. That’s different to today’s PHEV models, where the gasoline and electric engines work together to power the vehicle as needed, while the gasoline engine also charges the batteries. 

The V6 or V8 engine operated only as a generator to supply electricity to the electric drive unit once batteries were empty. The traditional transmission in each vehicle was removed, and the space used for batteries. No matter whether there was a large V6 or V8 at the front, power was provided solely by the 402-horse electric motor which managed a respectable 306 lb-ft of torque. 

VIA said its vehicles would accelerate to 60 miles per hour in a generally unimpressive 9.7 seconds, and on to a top speed of only 85. VTRUX trucks (Silverados) were claimed to manage 25 miles per gallon combined. The VTRUX van (Express) was said to meet 30 miles per gallon. Both these figures pertained to the times when the battery was depleted and the engine kicked on to restore power. In theory the vehicles would be charged often to minimize the gasoline used by the engine. 


And the batteries would definitely need charged often, as the VTRUX line was claimed to have around a 35-mile range on battery power. When combined with the greater MPG achieved running the gasoline engine to support the electric motor, VTRUX models achieved a total mileage range similar to the standard gasoline versions. 

An additional benefit of the electrified VTRUX models were their electrical outlets. The trucks could power tools on a job site with standard 120- and 240-volt outlets. Said power was drawn from the 24 kWh battery. It was estimated that charging up the batteries would take around four hours.

Ditching a transmission and partial operation on electric power alone were the selling points for the VTRUX line. VIA was focused on fleet sales and a low cost of ownership. The math worked out (per VIA) that after eight years of use, fleet customers would save roughly a third on ownership costs. Things like fuel and maintenance costs were much less with the VTRUX setup.

For the conversion from Chevrolet to VTRUX branding, VIA took off the exterior Chevrolet logos and applied their stylized VIA and VTRUX badging. On test models there were also some very large “ELECTRIFIED” wrap graphics along the side. VTRUX often wore VIA center caps on their various wheel designs.

Interior changes were very limited, as VIA did not develop their own airbag cover or replace other interior badging. The gauge cluster was modified as VIA removed the rev counter and replaced it with a power indicator to show the vehicle’s current mode along with battery charge, temp, and kW indicators (in the wrong font). The rest of the interior was standard Chevrolet.

The first model to go on sale in late 2013 was the VTRUX van, an Express 2500 equipped with the 4.8-liter V8. In 2014 the truck was launched on the new Silverado 2500 platform which utilized a 4.3-liter V6. VIA had plans for a third VTRUX model too, the so-called “Presidential SUV.” 

Pictured in marketing materials, it was planned to use the Vortec 5.3-liter V8 and the Suburban 2500 body. But GM dropped the Suburban 2500 line after 2014, so VTRUX offerings were limited to two models. The company was more focused on the Silverado variant, and offered it in two- and four-wheel drive, and single and extended cab variants. The first to go on sale was the four-wheel drive crew cab. 

Given the value proposition, saving ⅓ on maintenance over eight full years, one might have expected the purchase cost to be a third more than a regular 2500 truck or van. But no, VIA needed to charge twice as much as a conventional vehicle to turn a profit. In 2014, that meant a $38,050 ($49,946 adj.) WT 4WD Crew Cab trim was $76,100 ($99,893 adj.). A fleet manager attempting to explain why vehicle budgeting for the upcoming year suddenly doubled must have made for a difficult meeting.


To that end, the VTRUX did not prove very popular. After a short media blitz in 2013 showing prototypes on old generation GM trucks and some light coverage in 2014, it seems VIA discontinued their PHEV VTRUX line in short order (2015). While they focused primarily on 2500 vans and trucks in WT specification, there were other examples specially ordered, like the Silverado 1500 Z71 shown.

VIA changed tack immediately after their PHEV failure, and began work on an all-electric VTRUX line with a proprietary skateboard architecture. Presently, they do not acknowledge their first generation of VTRUX on their website, which reads as though the current EV venture is their starting point. If you’re interested in what VIA is up to today we can certainly talk about that in another installment, but that’s up to you. Until then!


[Images: Raser Technologies, VIA Motors, Seller


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Joey21 Joey21 on Jan 07, 2024

    Sounds a bit like XL Fleet which I feel was more of an accounting scheme than about saving fuel. They recently went bankrupt. I drove one of their trucks. Barely an MPG improvement. Added vibrations in drive line at key speeds as a bonus.

  • Wolfwagen Wolfwagen on Jan 08, 2024

    With Lutz the Putz involved, what could go wrong?

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next