Report: Honda Considers Building New EV Factory in Canada

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The Honda Motor Company has reportedly been going over prospective plans to build a $13.83 billion facility in Canada that would focus on the production of electric vehicles. Japan's Nikkei news group broke the story over the weekend, suggesting the site could include on-site battery production that would help the manufacturer with regional content requirements tied to U.S. incentives.


While the federal EV tax credit scheme was never supposed to be an indefinite program, changes made under the Biden administration have allowed manufacturers to continue taking advantage if they can adhere to specific content requirements stipulating that materials and labor be sourced within North America. Meanwhile, Canada has been eager to see more domestic production, has an EV incentive structure of its own, and seems eager to work with Honda.


In fact, the CBC just reported that Honda Global and Honda Canada executives already met with the Canadian government last month and plan to do so again to move the prospective program along.


From the CBC:


This week's meeting comes after senior executives from Honda Global and Honda Canada met with Industry Minister François-Philippe Champagne and other senior officials last month, according to sources with direct knowledge of the meetings.


Talks are supposed to focus around where the factory would be located (presumably somewhere in Ontario) and how the Canadian government might help. However, Honda isn’t expected to make any decisions until the end of 2024. The manufacturer has remained aloof, stating that it’s considering numerous projects so that it might adhere to its promise of building nothing but all-electric vehicles by 2040. But we’ve seen the EV goalpost shift frequently in recent years across brands, making us hesitant to assume anything.


For now, all Honda has said is that it’s prioritizing its joint venture with LG Energy Solutions in Jeffersonville, Ohio. The site, which broke ground earlier this year, is supposed to help turn the region into a hub for Honda’s electrified products. Assuming the facility is completed on time, production is supposed to commence late in 2025. But it would be a much smaller facility than what’s being discussed for Canada. The Ohio joint venture is supposed to come in around $3.5 billion, with hundreds of millions more going toward retooling existing facilities for EVs.


The hypothetical Canadian plant was, according to NIkkei, was said to represent an investment of roughly $13.83 billion (USD). This is roughly what we’ve seen other automakers pour onto similar concepts designed to adhere to their own electrification promises. But EV sales have begun to slow in recent months and there remains a meaningful subset of the market that simply isn’t interested in them.


Truth be told, plenty of that is bound to be attributable to the present economic conditions. Modern vehicle interfaces are also turning people off. While they’re hardly limited to all-electric vehicles, EVs frequently represent the most egregious examples of what the industry is doing. There are also horror stories regarding battery fires and people trying to get their EVs serviced only to find the dealership has no clue how to handle the situation.


Some of these issues are overblown while others are simply the result of automakers not having established the proper protocols on their new products. Regardless, it’s making it harder to sell all-electric vehicles at a time when most Western governments are doing what they can to force the industry into building them. Numerous European countries (and even a few states in America) have set deadlines to prohibit the sale of newly built gasoline vehicles by 2035. Meanwhile, automakers would like to benefit from the heavy government incentives associated with electric vehicles.


This makes the prospective Canadian facility an appetizing gamble. Honda would be able to localize manufacturing and some of the raw materials it needs for batteries. But it’s still not clear to anybody what the automotive landscape will actually look like in 10 years. EV adoption rates are not keeping pace with industry estimates and previous investments have broadly failed to yield any real profitability. Honda is undoubtedly weighing the odds, perhaps even taking into account the ramifications of a political shift in the Western world. Tomorrow’s leaders may not be interested in electrification and nobody wants to be in the midst of a multi-billion-dollar construction project if deregulation ends EV subsidies and emissions quotas that are effectively driving the project.


It’s a lot for Honda to think about and Canada is assumed to try and sweeten whatever deal it can to add more domestic jobs. Leadership seems eager to frame the nation as a global leader in EV production and the country’s natural resources may actually allow for that. But it’ll probably be months before we hear more about this and perhaps a full year before Honda feels comfortable making a decision.


[Image: Honda]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
27 of 30 comments
  • EBFlex EBFlex on Jan 08, 2024

    Oof. Canada is a disaster right now. And why Honda? Do you like just throwing money away?

    • See 19 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jan 10, 2024

      @Silvy_73 - It's winter therefore I am running the same fuel as heating oil. Like I said, heating oil is winter diesel.


  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 08, 2024

    A Honda EV made in Canada. That's 1 out of 3 for me.

    • See 4 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jan 09, 2024

      I too hate having to explain a joke. LOL




  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next