Junkyard Find: 2007 Mini Cooper S

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The "New Mini" first appeared in North American showrooms as a 2002 model, as part of the turn-of-the-century wave of retro-styled machinery that included the Volkswagen New Beetle, Chrysler PT Cruiser and Chevrolet HHR. It took about a decade for the 21st-century Mini to begin showing up in car graveyards in large numbers, and they remain easy to find today. Here's an '07 Cooper S model in a Colorado yard.

When BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994, the original Mini (which began production by the British Motor Corporation in 1959) was still being built. The various BMC successors had tried and failed repeatedly to design a Mini successor over the decades, but it took a big stack of Deutschmarks (and, later on, Euros) to do the trick.

I know that the official name of this car's marque is spelled MINI in annoying all-caps letters, but I have adopted a policy of repairing make and model names that incorporate such maddening tricks as punctuation marks or all-uppercase/all-lowercase letters. That means I refuse to play the marketers' clever games with the Nissan LEAF, smart fortwo, Volkswagen up! and all the rest (FIAT is a tough one, since it started out as a legitimate acronym for Fabbrica Italiana Automobil di Torino, but the company itself ditched the all-caps spelling many years ago).

The MSRP for the regular 2007 Mini Cooper was $18,050, while the hot-rod Cooper S version listed at $21,850 (those prices come to $27,673 and $33,498 in 2024 dollars).

New for 2007 was this 1.6-liter turbocharged straight-four engine co-developed by Peugeot and BMW, replacing the supercharged Brazilian 1.6 and its Chrysler/Rover ancestry.

This engine was rated at 175 horsepower and 177 pound-feet.

A six-speed manual was standard equipment. A six-speed Steptronic automatic was available; unusually, the buyer of this car chose the three-pedal setup.

There were convertible versions of the Cooper and Cooper S available as well.

Mini dealers offered many add-on accessories, including these John Cooper Works sill plates. They didn't make this car a real JCW, but still looked cool.

Way back in 2009, a 24 Hours of Lemons team tried to get a 2005 Cooper S through the BS Inspection unscathed, earning 1,066 penalty laps in the process.

By about the middle 2010s, these cars began appearing en masse in the boneyards I frequent, so many that I thought about doing a Minipocalypse article on the subject (along the lines of the Subiepocalypse and 240calypse pieces I wrote for this publication).

Now, of course, Mini Coopers are seen competing in most 24 Hours of Lemons races. They're cheap, quick enough to be fun, and junkyard parts are plentiful. Their main drawback is poor reliability, a trait they share with Lemons cars made by Toyota, Audi, Subaru, Mitsubishi and Nissan (strangely, cheap Alfa Romeos are very reliable under punitive road-racing conditions).

You could do a lot worse than a Mini Cooper S as a cheap project car, thanks to their fell-off-a-cliff depreciation and vast parts availability.

There is a lot of room in here, huh?

From the "What could they have been thinking?" department.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Apr 11, 2024

    German design and British assembly.....two wrongs don't make it right...think I'll pass!!! 🚗🚗🚗

  • Gayneu Gayneu on Apr 12, 2024

    I can comment on these. My wife always thought the Minis were "cute" so I bought her a used 2005 (non-S, 5 speed) for one of her "special" birthdays. She loved it and I kinda did too. Somehow a hole developed in the transmission case and the fluid drained out, ruining the car (too expensive to fix). A local mechanic bought it for $800.


    We then bought a used 2015 S (6 speed) which we still have today (80k miles). Her sister just bought a used S as well (also manual). It has been a dependable car but BMW-priced maintenance and premium gas hurts for sure. I think the earlier generation (like in the article) were better looking with cleaner lines. The 2015 S rides too stiff for me (Chicago roads) but is a hoot on smooth ones. It does seem to shift weird - its hard to describe but it shifts differently from every other manual I have driven. No matter how hard I try, so won't let go of her Mini.

  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
  • ChristianWimmer Great first car for someone’s teenage daughter.
  • SCE to AUX Imagine the challenge of trying to sell the Ariya or the tired Leaf.
  • Offbeat Oddity I would have to test them out, but the Corolla might actually have a slight edge. I'd prefer the 2.0 in both cars, but to get one in a Civic with a decent amount of equipment, I'd be stuck with the Sport where the fuel economy suffers vs. the Corolla. If the Civic EX had a 2.0, it would be a much tougher decision.
  • User get rid of the four cylinders, technology is so advanced that a four litre V8 is possible.. and plausible.. cadillac had a serious problem detuning v8s in the past, now theyre over-revving the fours and it sounds horrible.. get rid of the bosses and put the engineers in the front seat..
Next