Junkyard Find: 2007 Mini Cooper S

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The "New Mini" first appeared in North American showrooms as a 2002 model, as part of the turn-of-the-century wave of retro-styled machinery that included the Volkswagen New Beetle, Chrysler PT Cruiser and Chevrolet HHR. It took about a decade for the 21st-century Mini to begin showing up in car graveyards in large numbers, and they remain easy to find today. Here's an '07 Cooper S model in a Colorado yard.

When BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994, the original Mini (which began production by the British Motor Corporation in 1959) was still being built. The various BMC successors had tried and failed repeatedly to design a Mini successor over the decades, but it took a big stack of Deutschmarks (and, later on, Euros) to do the trick.

I know that the official name of this car's marque is spelled MINI in annoying all-caps letters, but I have adopted a policy of repairing make and model names that incorporate such maddening tricks as punctuation marks or all-uppercase/all-lowercase letters. That means I refuse to play the marketers' clever games with the Nissan LEAF, smart fortwo, Volkswagen up! and all the rest (FIAT is a tough one, since it started out as a legitimate acronym for Fabbrica Italiana Automobil di Torino, but the company itself ditched the all-caps spelling many years ago).

The MSRP for the regular 2007 Mini Cooper was $18,050, while the hot-rod Cooper S version listed at $21,850 (those prices come to $27,673 and $33,498 in 2024 dollars).

New for 2007 was this 1.6-liter turbocharged straight-four engine co-developed by Peugeot and BMW, replacing the supercharged Brazilian 1.6 and its Chrysler/Rover ancestry.

This engine was rated at 175 horsepower and 177 pound-feet.

A six-speed manual was standard equipment. A six-speed Steptronic automatic was available; unusually, the buyer of this car chose the three-pedal setup.

There were convertible versions of the Cooper and Cooper S available as well.

Mini dealers offered many add-on accessories, including these John Cooper Works sill plates. They didn't make this car a real JCW, but still looked cool.

Way back in 2009, a 24 Hours of Lemons team tried to get a 2005 Cooper S through the BS Inspection unscathed, earning 1,066 penalty laps in the process.

By about the middle 2010s, these cars began appearing en masse in the boneyards I frequent, so many that I thought about doing a Minipocalypse article on the subject (along the lines of the Subiepocalypse and 240calypse pieces I wrote for this publication).

Now, of course, Mini Coopers are seen competing in most 24 Hours of Lemons races. They're cheap, quick enough to be fun, and junkyard parts are plentiful. Their main drawback is poor reliability, a trait they share with Lemons cars made by Toyota, Audi, Subaru, Mitsubishi and Nissan (strangely, cheap Alfa Romeos are very reliable under punitive road-racing conditions).

You could do a lot worse than a Mini Cooper S as a cheap project car, thanks to their fell-off-a-cliff depreciation and vast parts availability.

There is a lot of room in here, huh?

From the "What could they have been thinking?" department.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Apr 11, 2024

    German design and British assembly.....two wrongs don't make it right...think I'll pass!!! 🚗🚗🚗

  • Gayneu Gayneu on Apr 12, 2024

    I can comment on these. My wife always thought the Minis were "cute" so I bought her a used 2005 (non-S, 5 speed) for one of her "special" birthdays. She loved it and I kinda did too. Somehow a hole developed in the transmission case and the fluid drained out, ruining the car (too expensive to fix). A local mechanic bought it for $800.


    We then bought a used 2015 S (6 speed) which we still have today (80k miles). Her sister just bought a used S as well (also manual). It has been a dependable car but BMW-priced maintenance and premium gas hurts for sure. I think the earlier generation (like in the article) were better looking with cleaner lines. The 2015 S rides too stiff for me (Chicago roads) but is a hoot on smooth ones. It does seem to shift weird - its hard to describe but it shifts differently from every other manual I have driven. No matter how hard I try, so won't let go of her Mini.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next