Report: Nissan Might Kill the GT-R After 2025

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

The automotive world is going electric while many companies are focused on keeping the lights on. Both are true for Nissan, so it’s not surprising to see that 2025 might be the last for its R35 GT-R sports car. The car hasn’t changed much in its 17 years on sale, but it’s hard not to mourn the death of another iconic gas vehicle.


Japanese auto magazine Mag X reported that Nissan will build just 1,500 units for the final 2025 model year, 300 of which will be reserved for the higher-performance Nismo configuration. There’s no word on how those vehicles will be distributed throughout the world, but the super limited production number means that they will be hard to get and expensive.


Nissan updated the car for the 2024 model year, giving the Nismo model a slight boost in output. The standard car’s twin-turbocharged 3.8-liter V6 retains its 565-horsepower base output, but the Nismo variant’s mill has been boosted to 600 horsepower. Nissan may opt for a special final-year configuration for the car, but there’s nothing official on that front.


The GT-R’s departure marks the end of an era for Japanese car enthusiasts. Even before The Fast and the Furious, the cars were legendary among JDM groups, and classic models’ desirability has made them some of the most expensive cars to import from Japan. The R35 was the first GT-R to be sold in the U.S., and its arrival was a revelation.


The car’s look, performance, and technology were completely alien to American enthusiasts, and while its star has faded a bit over the last almost two decades, it’s still a serious performance car with respectable numbers.


[Image: Nissan]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 11 comments
  • 2manyvettes 2manyvettes on Mar 11, 2024

    Being a Corvette enthusiast since 1979 when my father in law dragged myself and his daughter to a Chevy dealer and we reluctantly bought a new '79 model (still in the garage, drives like a tractor) I have always told anyone interested in a Corvette should buy a used one. People buy them and then never drive them. So a used Corvette can be had for a reasonable price, with low mileage. Not so with this Nissan.

  • Theflyersfan Theflyersfan on Mar 11, 2024

    I'm sure many of us here remember all of the criticism against the GTR circa 2008 or so. It's too digital. It's too heavy. The computers drive the car for you. Now, roughly 16 years later, or an even longer period of time than it took a space probe to fly by Neptune and head into the void, enthusiasts now look at the GTR as a purist supercar devoid of unnecessary screens, overdone styling and tech, and the weight hasn't skyrocketed while Nissan added more power and wanted a lot more money. I'll miss it. I'll miss the brutal way it blasted through corners with the somewhat crude DCT hammering through gears while making noises that can be nicely called Hoover-ish. But, hey, Nissan still sells the invisible on the streets Z, right???

  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
Next