Junkyard Find: 2007 Mini Cooper S

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The "New Mini" first appeared in North American showrooms as a 2002 model, as part of the turn-of-the-century wave of retro-styled machinery that included the Volkswagen New Beetle, Chrysler PT Cruiser and Chevrolet HHR. It took about a decade for the 21st-century Mini to begin showing up in car graveyards in large numbers, and they remain easy to find today. Here's an '07 Cooper S model in a Colorado yard.

When BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994, the original Mini (which began production by the British Motor Corporation in 1959) was still being built. The various BMC successors had tried and failed repeatedly to design a Mini successor over the decades, but it took a big stack of Deutschmarks (and, later on, Euros) to do the trick.

I know that the official name of this car's marque is spelled MINI in annoying all-caps letters, but I have adopted a policy of repairing make and model names that incorporate such maddening tricks as punctuation marks or all-uppercase/all-lowercase letters. That means I refuse to play the marketers' clever games with the Nissan LEAF, smart fortwo, Volkswagen up! and all the rest (FIAT is a tough one, since it started out as a legitimate acronym for Fabbrica Italiana Automobil di Torino, but the company itself ditched the all-caps spelling many years ago).

The MSRP for the regular 2007 Mini Cooper was $18,050, while the hot-rod Cooper S version listed at $21,850 (those prices come to $27,673 and $33,498 in 2024 dollars).

New for 2007 was this 1.6-liter turbocharged straight-four engine co-developed by Peugeot and BMW, replacing the supercharged Brazilian 1.6 and its Chrysler/Rover ancestry.

This engine was rated at 175 horsepower and 177 pound-feet.

A six-speed manual was standard equipment. A six-speed Steptronic automatic was available; unusually, the buyer of this car chose the three-pedal setup.

There were convertible versions of the Cooper and Cooper S available as well.

Mini dealers offered many add-on accessories, including these John Cooper Works sill plates. They didn't make this car a real JCW, but still looked cool.

Way back in 2009, a 24 Hours of Lemons team tried to get a 2005 Cooper S through the BS Inspection unscathed, earning 1,066 penalty laps in the process.

By about the middle 2010s, these cars began appearing en masse in the boneyards I frequent, so many that I thought about doing a Minipocalypse article on the subject (along the lines of the Subiepocalypse and 240calypse pieces I wrote for this publication).

Now, of course, Mini Coopers are seen competing in most 24 Hours of Lemons races. They're cheap, quick enough to be fun, and junkyard parts are plentiful. Their main drawback is poor reliability, a trait they share with Lemons cars made by Toyota, Audi, Subaru, Mitsubishi and Nissan (strangely, cheap Alfa Romeos are very reliable under punitive road-racing conditions).

You could do a lot worse than a Mini Cooper S as a cheap project car, thanks to their fell-off-a-cliff depreciation and vast parts availability.

There is a lot of room in here, huh?

From the "What could they have been thinking?" department.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Apr 11, 2024

    German design and British assembly.....two wrongs don't make it right...think I'll pass!!! 🚗🚗🚗

  • Gayneu Gayneu on Apr 12, 2024

    I can comment on these. My wife always thought the Minis were "cute" so I bought her a used 2005 (non-S, 5 speed) for one of her "special" birthdays. She loved it and I kinda did too. Somehow a hole developed in the transmission case and the fluid drained out, ruining the car (too expensive to fix). A local mechanic bought it for $800.


    We then bought a used 2015 S (6 speed) which we still have today (80k miles). Her sister just bought a used S as well (also manual). It has been a dependable car but BMW-priced maintenance and premium gas hurts for sure. I think the earlier generation (like in the article) were better looking with cleaner lines. The 2015 S rides too stiff for me (Chicago roads) but is a hoot on smooth ones. It does seem to shift weird - its hard to describe but it shifts differently from every other manual I have driven. No matter how hard I try, so won't let go of her Mini.

  • Loser I love these MN12 vehicles. We had a 92 Cougar, my dad had an 89, mom and brother both had T-birds. Wife and I still talk about that car and wish they still made cars like these. It was a very good car for us, 130,000 miles of trouble free and comfortable driving. Sold it to a guy that totaled it a month after purchase. Almost bought a 97 T-bird the 4.6 when I found out it was the last of them but the Cougar was paid for and hard to justify starting payments all over.
  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
Next