IIHS: Here's Why We Don't Crash Test at More Than 40 MPH

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety occasionally updates its testing methods to keep pace with a rapidly evolving automotive industry, but there’s one thing that hasn’t changed with the new tests: Crash speeds. In a recent YouTube video, the IIHS detailed why it hasn’t increased crash-test speeds above 40 mph despite the fact that most highway drivers routinely hit much higher speeds.


Raul Arelaez, the VP of the IIHS Vehicle Research Center, said that the organization's testing speeds align with the median speed of real-world crashes involving severe injuries.

“We know there are crashes that are more severe, but we are capturing the bulk of the total number of crashes. Most crashes are very low severity,” he said in the video.


Another reason for keeping speeds where they are is the fact that impact force doesn’t increase in a linear relationship with speed. Arbelaez pointed out that increasing speeds from 40 to 50 mph would bump crash energy by 50 percent and said that focusing on higher crash-test speeds could come at the expense of safety at lower speeds.


The IIHS updated its testing methodology in 2024, making it more difficult for vehicles to earn a Top Safety Pick or Top Safety Pick +. Pedestrian and crash prevention systems must now perform well in both day and nighttime, while headlights have to earn “Good” or “Acceptable” scores for the vehicle to qualify for an award. Additionally, the organization recently released a report showing that most advanced and semi-autonomous driving assistance systems fail to adequately monitor driver behavior and safety.


[Image: IIHS via YouTube]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 12 comments
  • Blueice Blueice on Mar 19, 2024

    One can not call or even email this worthless organ.

  • Daniel J Daniel J on Mar 20, 2024

    I'm not sure I entirely get this. Locally, when I see most of the major injuries and deaths in an accident, it's a drunk driver going the wrong way on a freeway going 60mph that fails to stop or even slow down. Wouldn't it be a good idea for car companies to invest in saving lives at higher speeds?

    • EBFlex EBFlex on Mar 21, 2024

      It’s not the automakers job to out engineer stupidity



  • SCE to AUX Here's a crazy thought - what if China decides to fully underwrite the 102.5% tariff?
  • 3-On-The-Tree They are hard to get in and out of. I also like the fact that they are still easy to work on with the old school push rod V8. My son’s 2016 Mustang GT exhaust came loose up in Tuscon so I put a harbor freight floor jack, two jack stands, tool box and two 2x4 in the back of the vette. So agreed it has decent room in the back for a sports car.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh so what?? .. 7.5 billion is not even in the same hemisphere as the utterly stupid waste of money on semiconductor fabs to the tune of more than 100 billion for FABS that CANNOT COMPETE in a global economy and CANNOT MAKE THE US Independent from China or RUSSIA. we REQUIRE China for cpu grade silicon and RUSSIA/Ukraine for manufacturing NEON gas for cpus and gpus and other silicon based processors for cars, tvs, phones, cable boxes ETC... so even if we spend trillion $ .. we STILL have to ask china permission to buy the cpu grade silicon needed and then buy neon gas to process the wafers.. but we keep tossing intel/Taiwan tens of billions at a time like a bunch of idiots.Google > "mining-and-refining-pure-silicon-and-the-incredible-effort-it-takes-to-get-there" Google > "silicon production by country statista" Google > "low-on-gas-ukraine-invasion-chokes-supply-of-neon-needed-for-chipmaking"
  • ToolGuy Clearly many of you have not been listening to the podcast.
  • 1995 SC This seems a bit tonedeaf.
Next