Audi R8 Endures Delayed Demise to Satisfy Demand

by Matt Posky

Published: February 8th, 2024

audi r8 endures delayed demise to satisfy demand

While Audi had previously confirmed 2023 as the last year of the R8, production of the model has continued into 2024. The automaker will reportedly be keeping the mid-engine coupe around through March to satisfy demand.

"It is true, the last Audi R8 will leave the production line at the end of the first quarter of 2024," Audi spokesperson Liza Kellner informed Motor1. "This marks the end of the production of an iconic sports car at the Audi Böllinger Höfe site in Neckarsulm. The all-electric Audi e-tron GT will continue to be built at the Böllinger Höfe."

Audi has opted to transition its entire fleet to all-electric vehicles and is leading with models like the e-tron GT to supplant the R8. As with the R8, the e-tron is based on another model from a fancier nameplate.

Whereas the Audi R8 served as a more-mature and less expensive alternative to the Lamborghini Gallardo and later Huracán, the e-tron GT actually stickers for higher than the Porsche Taycan. This may feel like a counterintuitive play for Volkswagen Group to have made and Porsche’s superior sales numbers may justify that assumption.

However, Audi is indeed making decent headway with battery driven vehicles. When so many other brands were seeing EV sales plateau through the second half of 2023, the German company enjoyed a 26 percent increase in the third quarter (year-over-year) on our market and noted that electric vehicles now make up roughly 13 percent of its total volume. Considering the field, that’s not bad.

Most automakers have vowed to go entirely electric within the next decade. However, these promises had been made before with many brands repeatedly readjusting their electrification goals to avoid embarrassment. It’s likewise skeptical that Audi is on pace to reach its stated targets. But it also probably has a better chance than most, based upon how things have been progressing.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t have anything that serves as a true replacement for the R8 and would like to milk everything it can from the model before production formally concludes. Audi is basically doing what Dodge did with the Challenger/Charger. It made sure everyone knew that it would never ever build another vehicle quite like it and then released a series of special edition models in the hopes of drumming up business.

The tactic was sound and has served both companies well in the short term. Dodge saw a bit of a sales bump after it started ringing the scarcity bell and was allowed to sell limited-edition appearance packages for far more than they were actually worth. Audi likewise saw some heat return to the R8 in 2023 with sales doubling over the previous year.

However, it is hard to say what was the result of clever marketing and what was the result of supply chain improvements leading to more normal production levels following the pandemic. It likewise needs to be said that it amounted to just 631 deliveries inside the United States. But we’re talking about a $160,000 performance car, not the Honda Accord.

Either way, demand has been sufficient for the company to continue production on the R8 for a few more months. While it’s unclear whether Audi is simply trying to satisfy existing orders (likely) or willing to take new ones if it thinks it can get them out the door before April has not been made clear. Perhaps if the company gets a rash of phone calls from people desperate to get what is arguably the brand’s most iconic model in decades we’ll hear about production stopping near the end of summer.

Despite the company having thrown a formal retirement party for the R8 last summer, it may be worth not ruling anything out. As of now, there is no direct replacement for the model. The e-tron GT is simply too different and we haven’t heard much on the Audi PB18 e-tron Concept that debuted in 2018. That production version of that car looked like the obvious R8 successor. But Audi’s last word on the PB18 was that the world would see it going into limited production targeting just 50 models. That story came and went without updates in 2019 and it almost feels like the brand forgot that it existed. Odd since it was electrified and that’s supposed to be the move for Audi.

“As part of our strategy, which has the clear objective of electrifying the entire product portfolio, we have decided to withdraw the R8 from the program at the end of the first quarter of 2024,” noted Kellner. “The statement that the R8 will be discontinued at the end of 2023 dates back to 2019. From this point of view, it is not surprising that the actual end date has changed by a few weeks."

[Images: Audi]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#NewsBlog #Audi #Production #ProductPlanning #R8

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 5 comments

Tassos on Feb 09, 2024

I’d rather have running water in my summer shack. I had to defer maintenance on my clapped out 7 series 20 years ago just to afford the bare land and toxic remediation. WORTHLESS BUSH PESOS

Like Reply
ToolGuy on Feb 12, 2024

Doesn't Taylor Swift have one of these?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.