Ramming Speed: Meet the 2025 Ram RHO

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

The 2025 Ram 1500 I drove earlier this year no longer offers a TRX model. We knew, however, that Ram wouldn't go long without offering a high-performance trim. Enter the 2025 Ram RHO


We knew this both because it's not very Ram-like to not offer something with plenty of power, and because Ram folks hinted at it during the Ram press launch.

Now we know the details.

The highlights here are the specs. Under the RHO's hood is a 3.0-liter turbocharged Hurricane inline-six cylinder that makes 540 horsepower and 521 lb-ft of torque.

Ram is promising a 0-60 time of 4.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile vanishing in 13.1 seconds at 105 miles. The fun cut offs at the claimed top speed of 118 mph.

Off-road running isn't forgotten, thanks to a suspension system with long travel and adaptive-damping. The upper and lower control arms are forged aluminum. It's independent up front and the spring rates are retuned. Bilstein adaptive shocks are here to help the RHO deal with varying terrain. A Jounce Control system is here to "provide bottom-out control during the most extreme compression events" and all drive modes can provide "peak damping" for the same. Translation: If you bottom out after a jump, the truck should be able to handle it. That said, don't try it at home.

Ram claims a water-fording depth of up to 32 inches.

Towing capacity is listed at 8,380 pounds and payload is listed at 1,520 pounds.

An eight-speed automatic transmission gets power to the wheels. Ram claims the powertrain sheds 150 pounds and that the truck's weight distribution is more balanced.

Since Ram envisions RHO owners playing in nature's sandbox, there's a hood duct that is setup to drain water and filter out debris. The high-flow induction system leads to a performance air filter that is easily accessed for cleaning.

Out back, there's an exhaust system that's unique to the RHO -- it has true dual pipes and a low-restriction system.

A full-time active transfer case from BorgWarner has a low range of 2.64:1 and is said to be stronger and more durable than what's on offer in other Rams. It can be flat-towed in neutral.

There's a Dana 60 rear axle that dampers axle hop, and the axle shafts are full-floating. RHOs have a rear electronic-locking differential, and the rear suspension has a five-link coil system with adaptive damping. Ram promises that the bed capacity won't be reduced by the additional 40 percent of rear-wheel travel. Those wheels, by the way, are 18 inches and host 35-inch tires.

Ride height is increased by 2 inches and the ground clearance for the RHO is 11.8 inches.

RHOs are 8 inches wider (six in track width) and will be visually differentiated by fender flares, LED taillights, and unique badging. Other items that vary from the regular Ram include the skid plates, front grille, hood, and bumpers. The headlights are also LED, along with the front marker lights -- some of which are integrated into the front hood scoop. You also get front and rear tow hooks.

Rock rails and graphics are optional.

Inside, there are upscale materials, custom badging (including one with the VIN), heated and cooled leather seats with suede inserts, carbon-fiber accents, a floor shifter, and paddle shifters. Options include other types of stitching and accents.

You'll plenty of screens, up to 50 inches combined. That includes the 14.5-inch infotainment screen, 12.3-inch gauge screen, and a 10.25-inch screen for passengers.

Drive modes include Baja, Sport, Tow, Mud/Sand, Rock, Snow, Custom, and Valet. There's a launch control system.

Other available tech includes a head-up display and hands-free automated driving that only works on certain roads. There will be dual wireless chargers for mobile devices.

Buyers will be able to get Harman Kardon audio and a system to help steer when attaching a trailer.

If you like hi-po trucks, Ram now offers you the RHO, Warlock, and Rebel on the 1500 and the Power Wagon and Rebel on the 2500 HD. Also new for this year is a Rebel X model that celebrates the 10-year anniversary of that trim and will offer cruise control that works on dirt roads, as well as an exclusive paint color.

The Warlock is lifted by an inch, has Bilstein shocks front and rear, skid plates, unique styling elements, and the 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six that makes 420 ponies and 469 lb-ft of torque. The sticker for that one is $54,260 plus the $1,995 destination fee.

Pricing will start at $69,995 with a $1,995 destination fee, and orders are open now. RHOs will ship this fall.

[Images: Ram]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Stan Reither Jr. Part throttle efficiency was mentioned earlier in a postThis type of reciprocating engine opens the door to achieve(slightly) variable stroke which would provide variable mechanical compression ratio adjustments for high vacuum (light load) or boost(power) conditions IMO
  • Joe65688619 Keep in mind some of these suppliers are not just supplying parts, but assembled components (easy example is transmissions). But there are far more, and the more they are electronically connected and integrated with rest of the platform the more complex to design, engineer, and manufacture. Most contract manufacturers don't make a lot of money in the design and engineering space because their customers to that. Commodity components can be sourced anywhere, but there are only a handful of contract manufacturers (usually diversified companies that build all kinds of stuff for other brands) can engineer and build the more complex components, especially with electronics. Every single new car I've purchased in the last few years has had some sort of electronic component issue: Infinti (battery drain caused by software bug and poorly grounded wires), Acura (radio hiss, pops, burps, dash and infotainment screens occasionally throw errors and the ignition must be killed to reboot them, voice nav, whether using the car's system or CarPlay can't seem to make up its mind as to which speakers to use and how loud, even using the same app on the same trip - I almost jumped in my seat once), GMC drivetrain EMF causing a whine in the speakers that even when "off" that phased with engine RPM), Nissan (didn't have issues until 120K miles, but occassionally blew fuses for interior components - likely not a manufacturing defect other than a short developed somewhere, but on a high-mileage car that was mechanically sound was too expensive to fix (a lot of trial and error and tracing connections = labor costs). What I suspect will happen is that only the largest commodity suppliers that can really leverage their supply chain will remain, and for the more complex components (think bumper assemblies or the electronics for them supporting all kinds of sensors) will likley consolidate to a handful of manufacturers who may eventually specialize in what they produce. This is part of the reason why seemingly minor crashes cost so much - an auto brand does nst have the parts on hand to replace an integrated sensor , nor the expertice as they never built them, but bought them). And their suppliers, in attempt to cut costs, build them in way that is cheap to manufacture (not necessarily poorly bulit) but difficult to replace without swapping entire assemblies or units).I've love to see an article on repair costs and how those are impacting insurance rates. You almost need gap insurance now because of how quickly cars depreciate yet remain expensive to fix (orders more to originally build, in some cases). No way I would buy a CyberTruck - don't want one, but if I did, this would stop me. And it's not just EVs.
  • Joe65688619 I agree there should be more sedans, but recognize the trend. There's still a market for performance oriented-drivers. IMHO a low budget sedan will always be outsold by a low budget SUV. But a sports sedan, or a well executed mid-level sedan (the Accord and Camry) work. Smaller market for large sedans except I think for an older population. What I'm hoping to see is some consolidation across brands - the TLX for example is not selling well, but if it was offered only in the up-level configurations it would not be competing with it's Honda sibling. I know that makes the market smaller and niche, but that was the original purpose of the "luxury" brands - badge-engineering an existing platform at a relatively lower cost than a different car and sell it with a higher margin for buyers willing and able to pay for them. Also creates some "brand cachet." But smart buyers know that simple badging and slightly better interiors are usually not worth the cost. Put the innovative tech in the higher-end brands first, differentiate they drivetrain so it's "better" (the RDX sells well for Acura, same motor and tranmission, added turbo which makes a notable difference compared to the CRV). The sedan in many Western European countries is the "family car" as opposed to micro and compact crossovers (which still sell big, but can usually seat no more than a compact sedan).
  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
Next