Ford Recalls Cars They Don’t Make Anymore

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

We’ve often said that building cars is hard – and those difficulties don’t always end even after a company stops making them. It’s like bad news coming in even after one has turned off their phone. 


At issue this time around is the 1.0-liter three-cylinder engine which was an option in certain models of the long-departed Ford Focus compact car and Ford EcoSport thing tiny crossover. More specifically, a faulty belt tensioner arm on the belt-driven oil pump may fracture or separate from the tensioner backing plate. A busted oil pump would cause an obvious loss of oil pressure, potentially leading to engine damage (duh) or, in specific conditions, the loss of power braking ability. It’s the latter which has apparently caused a crash and two injuries.


According to docs provided to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) by suits at the Glass House, over two thousand warranty claims have been filed related to this issue. It is said the company had a look at this issue back in 2022 but determined it was not a safety concern. Jeez. To fix affected cars, Ford dealerships plan to replace the oil pump drive belt tensioner assembly with a redesigned part but, as with most things in life these days, the replacement parts are not currently available.


Specifically, the recall targets EcoSport models with a 1.0L EcoBoost engine and an automatic transmission manufactured between April 3, 2017 and Oct. 12, 2021. This is in addition to Focus sedans and hatchbacks with the same powertrain combo manufactured between March 24, 2015 and May 4, 2018. There are approximately 140,000 units covered under the recall.


Whilst we continue to mourn the loss of both the Focus sedan and hatchback, particularly its spicy variants, precisely no tears have even been shed for the wretched EcoSport. As an unpleasant log laid by a company panicking its way into a segment it should have been in ages ago, the EcoSport was neither eco nor sporty – but at least it was expensive with a terrible interior. You’ll notice other models in its segment (Kia Soul, et al) had and continue to have no trouble finding buyers while the EcoSport has shuffled to the side. We’ll let you speculate why in the comment section.


[Images: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 61 comments
  • JK Savoy Blue is a thing, but Sestriere White? Sestriere is a ski town near Turin, so I guess it meant to conjure up thoughts of snow. Pretty car. I hope Pininfarina has success. The industry in and around Turin has taken a big hit and is a shadow of its former self.
  • Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
  • TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
  • John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
Next