Report: Future BMW I3 Will Be Less Weird Than Original

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

As BMW’s first mass-produced “zero emissions” vehicle, the i3 boasted a predictably quirky design that seemed to underpin most manufacturers early attempts at fielding an electric car. But the model fell short in terms of range and luxury, especially in relation to MSRP, resulting in a de facto city car for those who liked the idea of owning a BMW-badged EV.

While the vehicle implemented some novel features, the model has aged rather poorly due to advancements in battery technology. It could be argued that the i3 ended up a failure due to the fact that BMW never figured out how to produce them cheaply enough to be a volume vehicle. However, it may have also been too odd to garner true mainstream appeal — something the brand says it doesn’t want to happen for the i3’s successor.


Speaking with Germany’s Automobilwoche, BMW development boss Frank Weber admitted that the i3 was a bit of an odd duck.

"A lot of people liked it, but in the eyes of others the i3 was not a real BMW. A bit of an outsider in the classroom if you will. We will not repeat that in this form," he said.


On our market, the i3 was rarely seen beyond urban hubs. Over its nine-year production run, the little EV amassed roughly 250,000 sales globally and only about 45,000 of those landed in the United States. It was far more popular in Europe, with Germany seeing 47,500 i3 sales all by itself. But it was still a niche vehicle — too expensive to be entry-level and too humble to be a valid luxury product.


It lasted longer than many expected, with BMW ending production in August of 2022.

"BMW definitely needs to bring to market an affordable, compact car,” Weber said. "We attach great importance to offering customers the best possible access to the BMW brand. That is why we are thinking very carefully about how an entry offering can be part of the Neue Klasse family."


The brand’s “Neue Klasse” electric architecture is supposed to serve as the foundation for all subsequent EVs assembled by BMW. It’s supposed to ensure improved charging times, improved range, and reduced production costs across the lineup. However, Weber believes it will also help the company build a mainstream version of what the i3 was supposed to be.


That said, developing small and affordable vehicles doesn’t seem to be at the top of most automakers’ list of priorities right now. Despite global economic situations looking poised to toss a large portion of the planet into a subsistence mindset that would favor cheap, reliable transportation, most companies still seem to be prioritizing larger vehicles with broader profit margins.

BMW’s Neue Klasse vehicles aren’t even supposed to enter into production until 2025 and the first examples will be midsize sedans and sport utility vehicles. The i3 replacement is presumably going to manifest sometime after that.


"Within the first two years, we will then expand the Neue Klasse by four more vehicles," Weber stated. "You can easily imagine that a lot can be created from the middle downward to smaller vehicles as well as upward to larger vehicles.”

[Images: BMW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Oct 24, 2023

    Had an i3 REX years ago for a weekend when BMW couldn't give these things away. No way would I go for the rex version as you could smell gas in the car. What were they thinking???? Also, the e-range was effectively 55-65 miles. This is an errand car ONLY. I did hear that later versions came with bigger batteries for 100-120 miles/range.

  • Aensc_driver Aensc_driver on Oct 30, 2023

    I still drive a BEV 2018 i3 every day. The key is I bought it used, so I paid about half what the original owner did. It's an amazing city car, and the limited range (about 120 miles in city driving) isn't really an issue for my day-to-day routine (school drop-off, shopping, commute). The best part is that it costs a shockingly small amount to operate.


    With rear wheel drive and good acceleration, great visibility, and a 32.6-foot turning radius, there are few cars that are as well suited and fun for city driving.


    I think the lack of affordable small EVs in the US is a real shame. They fit urban and close-in suburban living well. And second Pickles69's desire to see a hatchback successor. I really want the utility without having to drive some enormous boat of a vehicle.

  • Jeanbaptiste 2022 Tesla model 3 performance ~35000 miles tires - ~$1000ish. Several cabin filters ~$50
  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
Next