Carbon Negative: Toyota Working On a Carbon Capture Filtration System

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Toyota has taken an all-around beating for its decision to focus on a diverse array of alternative fuels and electrification options instead of going all-in on EVs, but that approach has started to look more prudent as other companies struggle with slower-than-expected growth. The Japanese auto giant has developed hydrogen powertrains and been a staunch supporter of hybrid technologies, and now it is testing a new engine that can remove carbon from the air.


The carbon capture engine first appeared in a GR Corolla race car last year as part of a hydrogen fuel cell powertrain. It was already a zero-emissions configuration, but the added filtration system can actually remove carbon from the air around the car.


“This type of technology to capture carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is advancing rapidly in the infrastructure industry. But as far as we know, Toyota is the first company to test this technology in a vehicle,” Naoaki Ito, Gazoo Racing’s project general manager, said.


Toyota’s carbon capture system uses two filters and a fluid reservoir that traps carbon dioxide. It uses no energy, and the fluid moves into the reservoir using the engine’s heat. The automaker worked with Kawasaki Heavy Industries to develop the filters, which are similar to the technology used in modern exhaust systems.


Though Toyota tested the system in a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle, it said the tech would work with any motorized vehicle, including ones with gas engines. Right now, however, the system doesn’t capture as much carbon as a traditional vehicle produces in regular operation, so there’s work to do to make it commercially viable.


[Image: Toyota]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Norman Stansfield Norman Stansfield on Feb 26, 2024

    Need a way that's energy efficient & good for the environment to capture carbon.


    Trees?

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Feb 26, 2024

    I hope the carbon filter isn't TOO efficient. People (and all life on this planet) are all carbon-based lifeforms. I don't want to get suctioned by a carbon filter while driving!

  • Carsofchaos Styling is subjective, there are plenty of uglier cars out there (I'm looking at you, Lexus). But then again, I think 1958 Oldsmobiles are beautiful & have a man-crush on the Aztek, so I'm probably not the best person to ask if a car is good looking or not.
  • Zerofoo Any car with these types of mods has been run hard. Count on an engine rebuild on top of the ridiculous asking price.
  • Zerofoo I'm as interested in EVs as I am about my next washer and dryer set. Most are completely uninteresting and forgettable appliances.
  • Redapple2 Nice/Pluses[list][*]Armrest with raised island for cupholder / gear selector. Open Floorboard.[/*][*]Luxo cloth instead of leather.[/*][/list]Bad[list][*]No Carplay[/*][*]Black roof. Top 1/2 of car disappears.[/*][*]C to D pillar. What the hell is going on with the slashes on the glass?[/*][*]C pillar cut line make it impossible to get in the rear seat. FAIL.[/*][*]Rear style is a trainwreck. Upper and lower tail lamps. Sharply angled back light. Too much like Lyric whatever.[/*][*]Carbon fiber mimic looks like my friggin egg carton inside. [/*][/list]I dislike this car greatly.PS- the novelty of screen-heavy interiors have worn off at this point and will look dated far sooner than their more-analog counterparts.................... I never thought of this point. But, I think it is very true. Wise. Far Sighted.
  • Jalop1991 it looks like this car might be following the lead of the Prius in dictating to the buyers that "you don't need no stinkin' rear wiper", never mind that it's a freaking HATCHBACK.For reference, find a video about the Toyota digital rear view mirror--the video that shows it on the RAV. Note the part about how they specifically talk about how the rear wiper cleans up to that particular camera space on the rear window. Now ask yourself, what about the Prius? Nah. We'll sell you that feature, but it'll be useless unless you stop frequently to manually keep that area clear as you drive through the mountains in winter.Yeah, hatchbacks without wipers. They need higher MPG more than you need a wiper. What's next?But no worries; it does have the vaunted "Mondrian-patterned rear quarter-window graphic (that) fades to the rear, strengthening the fastback effect and low roofline".
Next