Junkyard Find: 1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Here's a car trivia question for you: what engine name went on to become the designation for a body style and then a car model name in its own right? The answer is, of course, Marauder.

Today's Junkyard Find is an example of the second type of Marauderization (not to be confused with Moroderization) within the world of Ford's Mercury Division.

Starting in 1958, Ford's new MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) big-block V8 engine was given the Marauder name when installed in Mercury models. Yes, I bought these badges.

The MEL engine became exclusive to just the Lincoln Continental starting with the 1961 model year (and staying in production through 1968), but the Marauder name was just too good to throw away. For the 1963½-1965 model years, every full-size hardtop Mercury model with a notchback roofline (instead of the goofy Breezeway roof) would have "Marauder" appended to its model name.

The big-Mercury universe for 1964 included the top-grade Park Lane, the mid-level Montclair and the might-as-well-be-a-Ford-Galaxie Monterey. Most accounts of the origin of the Montclair name state that it was derived from the name of the closest affluent town to Ford's Mahwah Assembly plant in New Jersey. I bought this badge to give to a friend who resides in another wealthy enclave called Montclair.

The door tag tells us that this car was assembled in St. Louis on November 7, 1963. It was painted in Carnival Red with the interior done up in black/black and had a 390-cubic-inch V8 engine with two-barrel carburetor bolted to a Merc-O-Matic three-speed automatic transmission. The DSO code of 51 shows that it was sold out of the Denver sales office.

Built in Missouri, probably shipped to Colorado by train, then sold new in Greeley, located about 60 miles north of Denver and the site of a famous Utopian community during the late 19th century. Greeley is also known for being the town that horrified Sayyid Qutb when he lived there in the early 1950s and hastened him on the path to becoming the Godfather of Al Qaeda. There's plenty of history in the junkyard, if you know where to look.

Its final parking spot was in the U-Pull-&-Pay just north of downtown Denver, so it appears to have spent its entire career in Front Range Colorado. I say "was" because I shot these photos more than a year ago and this car was crushed before we even reached 2023.

I'd have written about it earlier (I like to put the word out about cars like this while their parts are still available), but I went a bit Mercury-crazy with my junkyard writings during late 2022 and early 2023 and decided to take a break from writing about vehicles named after the God of Speed ( and Commerce).

The Montclair and Park Lane names disappeared after 1968 (the Monterey name survived through 1974, then was revived for the Mercurized Ford Freestar in 2004). The Marauder name got ditched in 1966, then revived on a massive personal luxury coupe for 1969- 1970. It was brought back to life on the 2003-2004 Marauder, a version of the Grand Marquis powered by the Lincoln Mark VIII's DOHC engine. The Mercury brand itself departed this world after 2011.

The body wasn't rusty and the interior was dirty but in solid restorable condition. Why did this car meet such a fate?

Sadly, big Detroit four-doors of the 1946-1975 era just don't have much of a following among American car aficionados, even when they have hardtop roofs, big-block engines and generous helpings of chrome.

This region is isolated from the major population centers of the United States, too, meaning it's a 20-hour tow to haul a project car to the West Coast or the big cities of the Upper Midwest from here.

The local car freaks have all the projects they can handle and then some. So, to The Crusher it went.

If it makes you feel any better, most of the good trim and glass parts from this car were purchased before it got squished and shredded.

Naturally, some junkyard shopper grabbed the 390 before I arrived. Ford FE engines are still worth money to Mustang restorers.

The ancient snow tires suggest that this car sat immobile for decades before coming here.

The Rockies began playing in 1993, so perhaps this car was a runner as recently as 30 years ago.

1963 was the final year in which AM radios sold in the United States were required to have the CONELRAD nuke-attack-warning frequencies of 640 and 1240 kHz marked on their dials. This car was built in 1963, so it's CONELRAD-compliant even though it didn't have to be.

They would have worshiped this car in Sweden, to which 10,000 classic American vehicles are imported each year, because Swedish car freaks love old Detroit sedans. If it had been in California and thus near a major port, such a happy ending for it might have happened.

The price is medium, the action Maximum. Just ask Parnelli Jones!

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

1964 Mercury Montclair Four-Door Hardtop Marauder in Colorado wrecking yard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 28 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Dec 05, 2023

    I kept wanted to say "Book 'Em Danno" while looking at the photos of the Mercury but this car predate Hawaii Five - O by 3 years.

  • Mdoore Mdoore on Jan 11, 2024

    they looked cool but my god... all that metal in the dash and no seatbelts. You would probably be killed or critically injured in an accident for sure.

  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
  • Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
Next