Junkyard Find: 1991 Ford Escort LX 4-Door Hatchback

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The Ford Escort began life in 1955, in Britain (just a year after World War II-era food rationing finally ended), as a cheapified version of the Ford Squire wagon. After the pinnacle of rear-wheel-drive Escort action on that side of the Atlantic, a front-wheel-drive version appeared over there; a not-so-closely-related North American cousin showed up as a 1981 model.

Fast-forward a decade and Dearborn had just the ticket for the second-generation of Escort: a sibling to the Mazda 323/ Protegé, which debuted as a 1991 model. Here's one of those first-year Mazdafied Escorts, found in a Denver-area car graveyard.

The early 1990s were interesting times for Ford designs, with the demise of the boxy LTD Crown Victoria and the introduction of the new Taurus and Crown Victoria with this distinctive grille treatment.

Though the second-generation North American Escort was a Mazda Protegé under the skin, Ford held onto the good old UK-developed CVH straight-four engine, a crypto-OHC design that displaced 1.9 liters in this application.

The Escort GT for 1991 got a Mazda DOHC 1.8-liter engine, from the same family that powered the Mazda Miata and Mercury Capri. If you got the regular Escort that year, though, you got the cam-in-head CVH with 88 horsepower and 108 pound-feet. That's what's in this car.

A five-speed manual transmission was base equipment, even in the cheapskate Escort Pony, but the original purchaser of this automobile sprang for an extra $732 ($1,662 in 2023 dollars) for this four-speed overdrive automatic.

The LX was the top trim level for the 1991 Escort sedan, and the MSRP on this one was $9,095 (around $20,656 after inflation).

It looks like a sedan, but that "trunk" is really a hatch.

Did you get air conditioning as standard equipment in the 1991 Escort? No, you did not! The refrigerated air in this car added $744 to the out-the-door price, or about $1,690 in today's money.

Cars of a few decades ago seem cheap by today's standards, but note that the automatic transmission and A/C—which come at no extra cost in nearly all the most miserable 2023 econoboxes—added the 2023 equivalent of $3,352 to the bottom-line cost of this car.

You did get an AM/FM radio at no extra cost in the '91 Escort LX, but adding the ability to play cassettes cost another $155 ($352 now). Hey, if you wanted to listen to your new Jane's Addiction tape in 1991, you had to pay.

This one just squeaked past the 175,000-mile mark during its life.

Remember these hateful automatic seat belts? In the early 1990s, US-market new cars without airbags had to have automatic belts.

Mr. Import is now Mr. Escort (though he's still driving a Mazda).

Wishing for style and performance in a small car? Start experience.

[Images: The author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 40 comments
  • Mark Mark on Sep 06, 2023

    I still drive my '91 Escort. Never fails to start. 5-speed, a/c (still runs on freon), cassette deck. Fun to drive.

  • Conundrum Conundrum on Sep 10, 2023

    I think we were lucky to get the Mazda as an Escort here in North America. The real Ford Mk 2 FWD Escort made in Europe was no winner. Knew several people who had these disguised Mazdas and they weren't bad at all. The CVH engine was a nasty throbber, but the 1.8 DOHC Mazda in the GT was a very nice little spinner indeed.

  • SCE to AUX Some pretty big strikes:[list][*]Drivetrain - how can a straight-6 be thrashy? Shame on you, Mazda.[/*][*]Poor fuel economy.[/*][*]Tire noise.[/*][*]Poor user interface.[/*][*]That colored dash is a bit garish for me.[/*][*]High price.[/*][*]Indistinct look in the Mazda lineup. Their SUVs are Russian nesting dolls.[/*][*]Nothing compelling to lure a buyer away from the bigger brands.[/*][/list]I don't see this moving the needle for Mazda in the US market.
  • Ash78 Dear unions, thank you for your service and for expressing interest in our automotive factories. Due to your many decades of pressuring employers to do better, the more adept companies have gotten your message and have implemented most of your demands preemptively in order to maintain a better employer-employee relationship than the manufacturing industry as a whole.We truly appreciate your feedback and interest, and all it has done to improve employer relations since the industrial revolution. We take your concerns seriously and will be glad to reach back out if our situation changes.We will keep your resume on file for three years, per company policy.Sincerely,Everyone
  • Theflyersfan I'm having a tough time figuring out Mazda's recent lineup decisions. I've mentioned before how having the CX-5 and CX-50 makes no sense as it seems like they would steal each other's sales instead of conquest sales from other brands. And now here comes the CX-70 vs 90 decision. If Mazda wanted to position the 70 above the 90 with pricing, I think they should have gone the Audi Q7 vs Q8 route. The Q8 costs more, has one fewer row, and is smaller on the inside, but has the more aggressive styling and tries to position itself as the sportier alternative large CUV in their lineup. With Mazda, the 70 and 90 seem to be in the position, like the 5 vs 50, to steal each other's sales. There isn't anything compelling me to get a 70 if I get more for my money with a 90, except 100,000 miles down the road, I won't have a folded up third row seat rattling around loosely. Mazda should have brought over the CX-60 and position that where they wanted the 70. I understand it's a touch larger than the X3, Q5, and GLC CUVs, which is a sweet spot in that market. Make the CX-70 a sportier alternative 2-row instead of such a blatant cynical move of just ripping a seat out of the 90, calling it an all new model and price it in the same ballpark. I want Mazda to succeed and continue to be independent, but decisions like these make me wonder what their future plans are.
  • Daniel J This thing is just too big and not packaged great being RWD. I'd prefer a FWD/AWD pre 2024 Santa Fe sized vehicle. A true CX-70.
  • Ash78 Now that we're on the topic, I think Apple owes us all a ton of money for bringing out new phones every 1-2 years and devaluing the one I have! /sDepreciation has always been a part of car ownership, far more so now if you're getting into EVs. I think it's just the discrete nature of these depreciation events (ie, price cuts) that have everyone wringing their hands.I'm too price sensitive -- not necessarily to BUY an EV -- but for the fear of what a truly disruptive battery tech might do to them. Split the differene with a hybrid or PHEV and you've reduced your car's reliance on battery tech as the primary determinant of value.
Next