Mercedes CEO Says Brand Sticking With China for the Long Haul

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Mercedes-Benz CEO Ola Kallenius has told the German media that the brand has no intention of cutting ties with China, saying such a move would be unwise for the whole of Germany industry. 

"The major players in the global economy, Europe, the U.S. and China, are so closely intertwined that decoupling from China makes no sense," he was quoted as saying in Bild am Sonntag.


With the global situation looking increasingly hectic and economies in varying degrees of disarray, there are a lot of questions about the future landscape of business. Like many Western nations, Germany cut ties with Russia when war broke out in Ukraine. However, the Russian government has reportedly been getting closer to China — which has a vested interest in becoming the dominant regional superpower. Meanwhile, the United States would like to maintain global supremacy and sees both nations as a mounting threat. 


This puts Germany in a difficult position, especially automotive manufacturers. Volkswagen is one of the most popular brands sold within the region by far and Mercedes-Benz moves substantially more product in Asia than the United States. Both markets remain extremely important, though China seems to be the one poised for the most growth in the years to come. 


U.S. brands like General Motors also have a lot riding on relations remaining copesthetic with China. However, America seems increasingly interested in distancing itself from the nation while Germany has grown more reliant on the Chinese market. This has resulted in a lot of speculation and encouraged industry leadership to weigh in on the matter, as noted by Automotive News


German automakers depend on the Chinese car market, the world's largest, and Mercedes counts China's Beijing Automotive Group and Geely Chairman Li Shufu as its two top shareholders.
China accounted for 18 percent of revenues and 37 percent of car sales at Mercedes in 2022 and Kallenius predicted more to come.
"Our sales figures in China are increasing and I am quite optimistic that we will also grow this year. During the corona years, the wealthier Chinese in particular made extraordinary savings," Kallenius said. "This purchasing power should benefit us."


That presumes there are no new global conflicts between nations, not that this would be the first time Germany has found itself going against the grain in Europe. 


Though it also fails to take into account that Chinese automakers all want to be come global brands and already dominate a few segments other automakers (including Mercedes) doesn't really bother with. For example, small EVs are the norm in Central Asia. But German automakers tend to focus on upmarket luxury models, with the only overlap being on customer data harvesting.


"In China, electromobility has so far developed via inexpensive small cars and city cars," said Kallenius. "Well over 90 percent of sales are achieved with e-cars that cost less than 40,000 euros. We don't even compete in that segment."


While China has shown an extraordinary enthusiasm for foreign capital, it has likewise launched the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The security bloc incorporates China, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Often presented as a trade organization, it’s effectively a stop gap for U.S. influence. 


Fingers are likely being crossed that relations stabilize and none of the involved parties decide to flex their muscles any more than they already have. But history is notoriously hard to predict in advance and is loaded with unsavory moments. Germany may find itself in an extremely undesirable position should the situation worsen and is going to hedge its bets wherever possible.


"We are not naive. Of course we see the political differences and tensions," Mercedes' top dog stated. "The Corona period has shown how fragile the supply chains are. We have to become more resilient here and more independent of individual countries, for example when it comes to lithium batteries."


[Image: pisaphotography/Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • BEPLA BEPLA on May 03, 2023

    China is a huge market - After all, they have the US dollars that were exported in exchange for cheap goods.

    So why would anyone abandon a large lucrative marketplace?


    Russia, on the other hand - just has Oil, and not very good oil either. Only the Oligarchs have money. So who cares about that market?

  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on May 03, 2023

    It is funny that when China is on precipice of financial and economic collapse Europe and esp Germany suddenly fall in love with China. There war is coming people, wake up, do not flirt with bad actors like Panda Xi. Germany had romance with Putin's regime, how that ended, broken heart?

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next