QOTD: Influenced by the Automotive Press?

by Tim Healey

Published: June 20th, 2023

After last week's story on how Consumer Reports slapped the "avoid" label on the popular Ford F-150, I was going to ask you how much CR shapes your purchase decisions. The magazine is popular, and I know a lot of people, both car enthusiasts and not, who trust it.

Yet sometimes CR says not to buy a car and it sells well. Or vice versa.

After some reflection, I figured opening this QOTD to the larger automotive press would generate a more robust discussion.

Of course, the automotive press has changed. Your local newspaper likely no longer has its own automotive critic -- and if it's publishing reviews at all, they're probably syndicated. That might affect how you, the consumer, do your research.

I'd hope you trust us -- you may not agree with us, or like my style or the style of others who write reviews here, but you should know we're honest. But I am not naive -- I suspect that when it comes time to shop for your next new car, we're just one stop on the dial, so to speak.

I'd bet my meager savings that you're looking at us, Jalopnik, the buff books, the car-shopping giants like Cars.com, and so forth and so on. And, of course, Consumer Reports.

So let's make this a multi-part QOTD. Does the automotive press factor into your car-buying decisions? If so, how, and how much? Which sites are you reading when shopping, and which are you reading just because you're daydreaming about a certain car? Which do you read just for fun? Do Consumer Reports recommendations matter to you? What about Cars.com, KBB, AutoTrader, Consumer Guide, et al? Are you reading the buff books for car-shopping advice, or more so because you want to see who wins the most recent comparison test?

Sound off below.

[Image: Ralf Liebhold/Shutterstock.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#QOTD #ConsumerReports #AutomotiveMedia #Journalism #AutomotivePress #QuestionOfTheDay #Journalismism

Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 58 comments

MaintenanceCosts on Jun 21, 2023

It's possible to learn things about cars by reading the automotive media, but you have to read way under the surface. On the surface, everything about every car is great, because automotive media may be the purest example of access journalism there is. But the reviewers who really care about their audiences will put in subtle tells. For instance, if you read "the car rode beautifully, with just a hint of undamped movement from the 20" wheels," you iknow that the car with the big wheels clomps harshly over the smallest bump and you should avoid it.

But even with careful reading they are no substitute at all for a short test drive. I make my decisions mostly through driving experiences.

1 Reply
Arthur Dailey on Jun 21, 2023

I used to religiously purchase Lemon-Aid and Consumers Reports prior to acquiring a vehicle. And we purchased a vehicle based on the recommendation of a Toronto based automotive writer who publicly wrote about purchasing that make/model for his family. We were very pleased with it.

Otherwise I believe that 'automotive journalism' is largely an oxymoron and they primarily shill for the manufacturers. Nearly every model is 'improved' over the previous one. Cars that were not competitive are suddenly 'competitive'. And they almost always test and recommend the 'fully dressed' version rather than the base version.

That is one reason why I originally started reading/viewing TTAC. To get a different perspective.

1 Reply
- See 1 previous
- Lou_BC on Jun 21, 2023
  
  There's a reason why they tend to be called "presstitutes".
  
  Like
- Sgeffe on Jun 22, 2023
  
  Correct--both of you!
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Buickman I was called crazy after predicting the sale of GMAC.#canthurtme
3-On-The-Tree Another observation during my time as a firefighter EMT was that seatbelts and helmets do save lives and reduce injury. And its always the other person getting hurt.
3-On-The-Tree Jeff, Matt Posky, When my bike came out in 1999 it was the fastest production motorcycle in the world, 150 HP 197 top speed, 9.57 quarter mile Hayabusa peregrine falcon etc. This led to controversy and calls for high-speed motorcycles to be banned in order to avoid increasingly fast bikes from driving on public roads. This led to a mutual decision nicknamed the “ gentleman’s agreement” to limit bikes to 186mph, ending the production bike speed contest for all bikes 2000 and upward. Honestly once your over a buck 20 it’s all a blur. Most super cars can do over or close to 200mpg, I know at least on paper my 09 C6 corvette LS3 tops out at 190mph.
3-On-The-Tree In my life before the military I was a firefighter EMT and for the majority of the car accidents that we responded to ALCOHOL and drugs was the main factor. All the suggested limitations from everyone above don’t matter if there is a drunken/high fool behind the wheel. Again personal responsibility.
Wjtinfwb NONE. Vehicle tech is not the issue. What is the issue is we give a drivers license to any moron who can fog a mirror. Then don't even enforce that requirement or the requirement to have auto insurance is you have a car. The only tech I could get behind is to override the lighting controls so that headlights and taillights automatically come on at dusk and in sync with wipers. I see way too many cars after dark without headlights, likely due to the automatic control being overridden and turned to "Off". The current trend of digital or electro-luminescent dashboards exacerbates this as the dash is illuminated, fooling a driver into thinking the headlights are on.