Quota Time: Connecticut Troopers May Have Faked 1000s of Citations

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

As if tagging drivers in a questionable speed trap wasn’t enough, it is being alleged troopers in the Nutmeg State have falsified thousands of traffic tickets.


According to local media, an audit stemming from an internal investigation has apparently uncovered a scheme in which troopers faked upwards of 26,000 tickets over a seven-year period. That’s cause enough for concern but compounded by the allegation that these actions were taken in order to line their own pockets since so-called ‘productive’ troopers are seemingly eligible for federally funded overtime pay.


That sound you hear is lawmakers and the public alike clamoring for answers.


For bringing this shameful practice to light, it seems we can thank one Ken Barone, a person who toils as an associate director at the University of Connecticut. His profile on the school’s website says he is responsible for coordinating data collection and submission from over a hundred law enforcement agencies while also working as a “fair and impartial” police trainer with over 800 students under his tutelage in the past decade. He pushed for the audit which uncovered these allegedly fake tickets.


How the scheme played out hasn’t been made crystal clear to the public at this point, though Barone told local news there’s “no evidence these are real people,” when speaking about the fake tickets. Depending on the details added to the bogus citations, there could also have been a skewing of data about racial profiling and other demographical information. It’s no secret that those holding the levers of power sometimes look to such statistics when planning new roadways or adjusting speed limits, for example.


One officer has already been suspended over the schmozzle, and Governor Ned Lamont is calling for more heads to roll. “It’s also very clear at this point that federal authorities are looking into this as well,” Lamont said to the media. “Not just the troopers who did it, but the supervisors who allowed this to happen, or perhaps encouraged it.” Lawmakers are holding a hearing on July 27 about this scandal. We plan to stay tuned.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 32 comments
  • Sayahh Sayahh on Jul 23, 2023

    I hate the arrow on the side of the page. Twice I've written a long comment and, while trying to close the video window, accidentally clicked something that led to a new page and pressing BACK did not restore the comment, i.e., it was deleted.

  • Zerofoo Zerofoo on Jul 24, 2023

    Police forces should be prohibited from using traffic citations as officer performance metrics, and the fine money that results from traffic citations should be put back into state and local general funds where taxes paid by the taxpayers are reduced by the same amount.


    Take away financial gains from traffic citations and fraud and abuse will go away.

    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jul 24, 2023

      Oddly enough even in a state where ticket quotas were made illegal over forty years ago what happens in reality is the LT "encourages" the patrolmen to "pull movers" for career advancement. This despite the fact the muni police are directly losing money per operating hour per car vs realized "revenue" (munis only get a small portion on the citation). The whole thing is literally about oppressing the citizens, the practice sickens me.


  • Redapple2 All this BEV investment. A bigger impact (less oil consumption) would have been made if we had made PIG UP trucks smaller since 2000 and not HUGEr. (And raised gas tax by $2-3/gallon.)
  • ChristianWimmer One of my clients is a company that is actually producing eFuels in Leipzig. Yes, they require a lot of energy to produce but this would not be an issue if Germany had nuclear energy or used the excess energy from wind and solar to produce these fuels. In such a scenario the energy losses wouldn’t really matter.Also, I am told that nations like Spain or the North African nations like Morocco or Tunisia could be ideal places to produce eFuels/Hydrogen due to their abundance of solar power. Again, the energy loses here would not matter since the energy used to produce these fuels is essentially “free”. If this path were pursued, Morocco and Tunisia could become wealthy nations and exporters of eFuels and Hydrogen. Countries with an abundance of solar or wind or hydro energy could be producing eFuels for their domestic consumption and export.Another argument which to me is irrelevant these days ist the poor thermal efficiency of ICE engines (25-35% gasoline, 40-45% diesel). One long trips with cruise control set to 130 km/h and even the occasional venture into the 180-200 km/h zone, my fully loaded (with my gear) A250 (2.0 4-cylinder 224-hp Turbo) can achieve an impressive gas mileage of 6 L / 100 km. That’s phenomenal - I am looking at six 1 liter bottles of water right now and that’s all my car needs to travel 100 km… amazing.So, I am a supporter of eFuels. I love internal combustion engines and if we want to use them in a climate neural way, then eFuels are a must. Also, to me every ICE car is way more sustainable and longer-lasting an an EV. Mazda, Toyota etc. are making the right move IMO.
  • Blueice Once you infuse governmental unit regulation & [marketing] and taxpayerfunding, one knows quite well, dat the product or service isdestine to fail; which includes battery vehicles. Just axe yourself how revolutionary have your home batterydevices become ??? I am still waiting. after three decades, for a battery shaver whichonly requires charging two or three times per year.I am glad that I do not have a plug in Frau.
  • Tassos Such a heavy breadvan on stilts, with so much HP, AND with ONLY 100 KWH Battery, I doubt if you will ever see 250 miles, let alone 300, under the best of conditions. In the winter, count on 150 miles range.And NO, it looks TERRIBLE. The only SUV that looks great is the RANGE ROVER.
  • Tassos They sure are doing the right thing in the SHORT and MEDIUM term.As for the long term, in the long run, YOU'LL ALL BE DEAD, so WHO CARES.
Next