2024 Lexus GX Knows What It’s Supposed to Be

by Matt Posky

Published: June 9th, 2023

2024 lexus gx knows what its supposed to be

Lexus has finally shown the brand-new GX midsize SUV for 2024 and it’s leaning hard into its status as an off-road vehicle. Whereas the previous generation offered something a little more brutish looking than your typical Lexus utility vehicle, the new model is about as butch as luxury vehicles come. The only way the manufacturer could have been more clear about what this vehicle was about would be if it put a giant decal on the side that read “BODY-ON FRAME 4X4 FOR DIRT PLEASE.”

The premium brick will be launched as the GX550 offering a 3.4-liter,

twin-turbo V6 with 349 horsepower and 479 pound-feet of torque. Though a hybrid variant is supposed to come later on, presumably akin to the powertrain found in the Sequoia iForce Max — which uses the same V6 and pairs it with an all-electric motor to produce a combined 437 hp and 583 pound-feet of torque.

Odds are good it’ll offer better fuel efficiency and presumably the ability to drive the SUV as a battery-only automobile for short distances. We’d imagine reliability on the hybrid won't be quite so bulletproof as the unaided V6. But with the company suggesting just 17 mpg (combined), some drivers might be inclined to go with the hybrid. Regardless, we’ll have to see what Toyota’s luxury arm cooks up and how much it’s going to cost.

All-wheel drive is predictably obligatory and the GX likewise comes with a center-locking differential and adaptive dampers. Independent front suspension and a solid rear axle are likewise standard, with Lexus featuring its Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System (E-KDSS) that’s now electronically controllable.

The 2024 GX will be offered in six trims: Premium, Premium Plus, Luxury, Luxury Plus, and the all-new Overtrail and Overtrail Plus.

Customers hoping to tackle the gnarliest of trails will undoubtedly be browsing the Overtrail models, as they bake in the most hardcore features for a would-be ORV. However, Lexus hasn’t yet issued the full details on the differences between trims.

While the next-generation GX is already 3.74 inches wider than the previous model, the Overland pushes the wheels out almost another inch, and features a rear locking differential, hardcore skid plates, and 18-inch wheels wrapped in 33-inch all-terrain tires.

Customers will also be happy to learn that Multi-Terrain Select (MTS), Crawl Control, Downhill Assist Control (DAC), and 3D Multi-Terrain Monitor systems are standard on all GX Overtrail models.

Though even the base GX is supposed to be a better offroader than its predecessor. The A-pillar has been pulled back for increased visibility and the front overhang has been decreased by 0.78 inches for improved clearance. Still, it’s a larger vehicle overall and that could make it a little harder to get down particularly narrow trails with low-hanging tree limbs.

The interior showcases even bigger changes. However, this is undoubtedly due to just how long the old GX had been around. There's a 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster and a 14.0-inch touchscreen infotainment system that’ll be used to handle most tasks. But some physical controls have been retained. For example, the HVAC system seems to use knobs and (touch-sensitive) buttons. Most of the terrain management features (including differentials) also seem to have dedicated buttons of their own.

We’d like to have seen more physical ways to interface with the GX. But we don’t yet know how Lexus has everything set up and the company is claiming that its voice command has been improved significantly.

Towing capacity has increased to 8,000 pounds for Premium, Premium+, and Overtrail grades with the standard tow hitch. The rest of the GX line should be just shy of 7,000 pounds. There should also be a fair bit of customizability between trims, with the Overtrail coming with plenty of unique touches the others lack.

For 2024, the Lexus Safety System Plus 3.0 comes standard on every GX sold. That means owners will get Pre-Collision System (PCS) with Pedestrian Detection, All-speed Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DRCC), Lane Tracing Assist (LTA), Lane Departure Alert with Steering Assist (LDA w/SA), Road Sign Assist (RSA) and Proactive Driving Assist (PDA).

Pricing is TBD until Lexus says otherwise. The previous generation started just below $60,000 and we’d love to see that remain the case. But we’re under the impression that’s wishful thinking. With manufacturers raising prices almost everywhere, we’d be shocked if Lexus introduced the imported GX for the same rates as the outgoing model.

[Images: Toyota/Lexus]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#NewsBlog #Lexus #Toyota #Gx #GX550 #SUVs

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 37 comments

Griz Goswick on Jun 12, 2023

They spent millions of dollars to design a new engine and it doesn't really get any better fuel mileage than than the previous engine? Whats the matter with Toyota engineers? Of course, the idiots had to make it bigger and heavier, when the thing was already too big for serious off road use. SMH.

Like Reply
95_SC on Jun 12, 2023

"Plenty of room for peter puffing in her per our tests. We rate it 5 stars!"

-EBFlex and Tassos

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?