The Right Spec: 2024 Ford Ranger

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

The midsizer from Dearborn was overhauled for the 2024 model year, introducing sorely needed updates to its interior and new styling plus an improved choice of powertrains. This makes it a decent selection for our Right Spec series – at least until someone at Toyota deems us all worthy of a build-n-price tool for the Land Cruiser.


Given the opportunity and budget, most gearheads – including this author – would head straight for the Raptor: Do not pass Go, do not collect two hundred dollars. With 405 horsepower from its EcoBoost V6 and even more torque, plus gonzo off-road chops, there are arguably worse ways to spend $55,000 plus tax.


Nevertheless, it’s a decent idea to inject a skiff of realism into these exercises. The midlevel XLT 4x4 has a sticker price right at $40 grand including destination, marking it as one of the few pickups not called Maverick to slot in south of this nation’s average transaction price of a new vehicle. With styling hauled in line with other Ford trucks, a crew cab with a 5-foot bed is the lone body style on offer, making that choice rather easy. A decent paint shade like Velocity Blue is gratis, which is good news.

The XLT is expected to be the least-expensive trim in which one can spec the new 315 horsepower, 2.7-liter twin-turbo V6, though pricing details aren’t yet available; so long as its cost is kept within sight of the upgrade charge for this engine in the Bronco, I’d select it simply for the extra torque. Four-wheel drive is a must for me, as is the selection of a $420 rear-locking diff.


In the now-competitive cabin, one could spend $945 upgrading the environs with a so-called XLT High group, bringing the likes of power seats and a 12-inch infotainment screen. The thing is, even the base truck comes with a portrait-style whopper which looks and operates just fine. There’s no stupid visual chicanery such as enormous bezels or blank block-off plates when selecting the smaller screen, items which used to plague decisions of this sort in past years since they branded the owner as an obvious cheapskate. 

For a pittance, Ford will slather chrome on the bumpers and other exterior surfaces, sating styling requirements of grandfathers across the nation. For the rest of us, dark grey accents are standard kit. At the risk of incurring the ire of the Blue Oval’s PR guy who may or may not be reading this post, I do feel the FX4 package has turned into something of a styling exercise, especially since a rear locker can be spec’d separately for less than one-third the price. True, FX4 does bring off-road tires, bash and skid plates, tuned shocks, and extra driving modes – but this writer will pocket the difference and buy his own set of preferred LT off-road tires after delivery. Either that or wait for the inevitable Tremor trim coming in the next year or two, a much more comprehensive off-road package.


Other than that, an $825 trailer tow package (chosen over the $495 towing option since it includes a brake controller) would be the final addition. All told with destination? $41,830.


[Images: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Kwik_Shift_Pro4X on Oct 08, 2023

    Another giant center tablet being used. 😒 "Monkey see, monkey do" as observed to car manufacturers striving to make every vehicle within it's respective class, look exactly the same.

  • Marques Marques on Jan 03, 2024

    I've had a few basic or loaded trucks in my time.

    1993 Ford F-150 Regular Cab Long bed,2WD

    3.8 liter Essex V6 5-speed manual Green with grey interior,Roll up manual windows, manual locks.


    2008 Ford F-350 Super Duty Super Cab(extended cab) Long bed 4WD6.4 liter Power Stroke twin-turbo diesel 6-speed manual Red with grey interior,front manual locking hubs,a.k.a "The Beast"



    2003 Nissan Frontier King Cab SVE(Supercharger Value Edition) 4WD

    3.3 liter supercharged V6 5-speed manual Ice Silver metallic with grey interior

    Fun to drive,it drank fuel like a drunken sailor on shore leave(17 mpg on average, and it required premium fuel) but it got the job done.


    Lately I've been looking at pickup trucks on the used market and the only ones that fit my requirements are previous generation Nissan Frontier, Toyota Tacoma and Ford Ranger models that offer an extended cab. The Tacoma gets extra points for having a manual transmission available,the new 2024 models you can't get the XtraCab with a manual on any trim level. Aside from that the 2022-present Nissan Frontier looks good,plus it has a V6.

  • UnoGeeks Great information. Unogeeks is the top SAP ABAP Training Institute, which provides the best SAP ABAP Training
  • ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
  • ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
  • VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
  • Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
Next