2022 Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Ultimate – Not Quite Fully Charged

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2022 Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Ultimate Fast Facts

Powertrain
Dual electric motors, front and rear (402 horsepower, 486 lb-ft of torque)
Transmission/Drive Layout
Single-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPGe
94 city / 80 highway / 87 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, Le/100KM
2.5 city / 2.9 highway / 2.7 combined (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$58,750 (U.S.) / $72,250 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$60,540 (U.S.) / $75,650 (Canada)
Prices include $1,095 destination charge in the United States and $2,720 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

On paper, the 2022 Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Ultimate seems like a fine compact EV. And it looks cool. Yet it has quirks that detract from the experience – which would be OK if the driving dynamics were just a tick better.

“Quirky” is an adjective that’s been applied to Volvos in the past, in ways both good and bad, and it certainly applies here, though the quirks are more confounding than fun.


Let’s start with the most noticeable quirk – the lack of a button for starting the motor. When you want to drive, you sit down and weight sensors note your presence – you put your foot on the brake and pull back on the gear shift. A “ready” notice appears in the dash and you’re ready to drive.

When you park, you just put the gear selector in park and get out. It shuts down once you do.

In theory, this seems nice and convenient. But is pressing a button that hard? It’s already an EV, you’re not waiting for an internal-combustion engine to turn over and fire. I couldn’t think of a use case where needing to be in the driver’s seat with the key on your person would inconvenience you except for a scenario where a driver runs into a store and leaves passengers to play with the radio. I’ve reached out to Volvo for clarification on this and will update if I receive it.

Admittedly, this could be Ludditism (did I just make up a word?) at work – this might be one of those things that become second nature and quite natural to owners. To me, it felt like tech for the sake of tech – “Hey, we can do this, so we should, even if it’s not all that beneficial.”

Another annoying quirk involved the infotainment system and its learning curve. The good news here is that the screen is huge and easy to read. Props to Volvo for that. The bad news is that some of the menus are a bit tricky to decipher if you’re new to the brand – I found myself performing an unintended function a bit too often.

On the other hand, that may have also been a car-reviewer problem. As much as we underpaid and overfed keyboard wretches kvetch about difficult-to-operate infotainment menus, we do understand that in many cases, familiarity breeds ease of use. In other words, these problems go away once you learn the system, which any owner would in short order.

To be fair, Android phone users may find the Google-based system a bit quicker to learn than iPhone users.

Finally, like many EVs, the Volvo ditches AM radio. We’ve covered the disappearance of AM radio a lot lately, and some of you say you won’t miss it, but I still listen to sports and news on AM and found myself missing it. Save the AM radio!

I’d probably not have led the review with relatively minor complaints if the C40 was more engaging to drive. It’s got the typical EV quickness from jump – as repetitive as it might make reviews, I love how almost all EVs offer instantaneous torque – but I was let down by artificial steering feel and handling that felt a tad too ponderous for a car of this size. That’s a relative term, to be sure – the C40 does have some sprightliness. Just not quite enough. You get a sense of sport on initial turn-in, but the car could be even livelier. Again, the lack of connection from the steering wheel to the tire could be at issue here.

Handling might be a bit of a letdown, but the car’s ride is generally good, though a bit too stiff at times, especially when encountering the broken pavement that’s so common in my home city. The overall ride/handling/acceleration package isn’t bad – I don’t want to lead you astray, dear reader, and come across as too harsh – so much as that it doesn’t live up to its initial promise. You can have some fun here, but I feel like the C40 could do more with a little extra effort on Volvo’s part.

The dual electric motors (front and rear) that provide the car with all-wheel drive get their juice from a 78 kWh lithium-ion battery, and the system’s output is 402 horsepower and 486 lb-ft of torque. Again, this amount of power available on instant demand means the car’s ability to get moving from a dead stop is impressive.

Like many EVs, the C40 recharge offers one-pedal driving.

Volvo is a brand with offerings ranging from entry-luxury to full-scale luxury, and the C40 Recharge is supposed to be a reasonably-priced electric upscale urban runabout. Herein lies the true problem. The car’s driving dynamics might a bit of a letdown, but the handling is still pretty decent. There’s power on tap for acceleration. The quirks I whined about up top won’t annoy everyone. But the price tag is a bit off-putting.

The base price for my test unit was $58K. That price includes features such as the 12.3-inch gauge screen, 9-inch infotainment screen, Google services, climate pre-conditioning, Bluetooth, USB ports, wireless phone charging, LED headlights, LED fog lights, blind-spot information system with steer assist, cross-traffic alert with automatic braking for collision avoidance, collision mitigation, lane-departure alert, lane-keep assist, a fixed panoramic glass roof, heated front seats, and dual-zone climate control.

That base price included the Ultimate package, which included 20-inch wheels, heated rear seats, the aforementioned keyless drive, adaptive cruise control, a power liftgate, Harmon Kardon audio, and a heated steering wheel. So, with the $695 metallic paint and the $1,095 destination fee, the total came to $60,540.

Perhaps that’s the biggest letdown here – the C40 Recharge could be a fun, relatively affordable way to introduce buyers to EVs in general and the Volvo brand specifically. I understand that the build costs of EVs are high now and will drop as the technology spreads, but for now, it’s unfortunate that getting the ultimate recharge will cost so much.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • Haze3 Haze3 on Jun 12, 2023

    As Tim noted, quirks are fine but the price is the issue.


    In the mid-50K's, they are competing with substantially more capable vehicles (range, size, etc.) from several manufacturers. Only blind Volvo loyalty is on their side.

  • Neil  Joyce Neil Joyce on Jun 18, 2023

    Begin now earning every month an extra amount of $17k or more just by doing very simple and easy online job from home. I have received $18953 in my last month direct in my bank acc by doing this easy home base job just in my part time for 2 hrs maximum a day online. Even a child can now do this job and earns money online. Everybody can get this home job right now and start earning dollars online by follow details here……….

    Click the link—↠ https://.Worksprofit.com


  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next