2023 Honda HR-V EX-L AWD Review – Enticing Yet Flawed

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Honda HR-V EX-L AWD Fast Facts

Powertrain
2.0-liter four-cylinder (158 horsepower @ 6,500 RPM, 138 lb-ft @ 4,200 RPM)
Transmission/Drive-Wheel Layout
Continuously-variable automatic, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
25 city / 30 highway / 27 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
9.4 city / 7.8 highway / 8.7 combined (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$28,950 (U.S.) / $37,130 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$30,590 (U.S.) / $39, 563.50 (Canada)
Prices include $1,245 destination charge in the United States and $2,133.50 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Once upon a time, the Honda HR-V was a nice little affordable urban runabout with a cramped interior, unremarkable dynamics, and boring styling.

The 2023 Honda HR-V is a much nicer package, with a roomier, nicer cabin and styling that will get noticed – though not necessarily in a good way.


It also offers handling that actually has some verve – Honda remembered that they’re Honda – and a comfy ride. Now, let’s talk about giving that engine some more guts. And giving this crossover some better tires.

The 2.0-liter four-cylinder makes 158 horsepower and just 138 lb-ft of torque, and that’s disappointing. There’s a lack of passing punch here, and merging takes some planning. The HR-V could be a fun little urban commuter if it had, say, 200 lb-ft of torque. Maybe even 175. But there’s just not enough grunt here.

The other thing that’s lacking is rubber – the tires here give up the ghost a bit too easily when pushed, especially if the pavement is a bit wet. Yes, yes, we know – few folks are slaloming a small crossover around an autocross. But even accounting for vehicle type and use case, Honda should shoe the HR-V with grippier tires.

Especially since the handling here is good enough that you might want to have a little back-road fun, crossover or not. For reference, my test car had the available all-wheel drive system.

Credit the MacPherson strut suspension up front and rear multi-link for this. The electric power steering manages to feel actually connected to the road and not too artificial.

At least the continuously-variable automatic transmission doesn’t annoy. Most of us disdain CVTs but this is one of the better ones.

The HR-V’s interior will be familiar to anyone who has spent time in the Civic, and that’s a good thing. It looks classy, it’s functional, and everything just sort of works. There’s leg- and headroom a plenty, and the seats are comfy. The only downside is that some materials feel cheap, especially in the top-trim EX-L I drove – a vehicle that costs $30,590. Oh, wait, there’s one more downside – the tacked-on infotainment screen.

Honda gave the HR-V new styling, and it’s more than a tad polarizing, thanks to the snub-nose shape. It looks better in person than in pictures, but it’s still a bit of a puzzling choice. Similarly puzzling was the decision to not include a power tailgate – something competitors offer.

My test unit – a top-trim EX-L with all-wheel drive – had a base price of $28,950. That price included features such as leather seats, heated front seats, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, blind-spot information monitor, rear cross-traffic monitor, driver attention monitor, Bluetooth, satellite radio, USB, keyless starting, wireless phone charger, dual-zone climate control, 17-inch wheels, LED headlights and taillights, keyless entry, remote start, adaptive cruise control, collision-mitigation braking, lane-keeping assist, road-departure mitigation, and traffic-jam assist. The only option was the $395 Nordic Forest paint.

Taken as a whole, I found the HR-V to be a pretty decent choice as a small crossover – and it’s certainly a more appealing choice than it was before. It needs a bit more power, a better tire choice, and some nicer interior materials to really stand out. As for the divisive looks, well, keep in mind you don’t have to see the grille while driving.

Honda took a huge step in the right direction with this generation of the HR-V. A few tweaks and the company will have one of the stronger entries at this price point.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Tonycd Tonycd on Jul 11, 2023

    Tell me about it. I have a family member whose CR-V has been soldiering on for over 20 years now.

  • Joel Sturm Joel Sturm on Jul 20, 2023

    My 2011 CR-V continues on--like new. In all this time, with lots of kilometers, two items have "given up"--the a/c compressor and the actuator in the passenger front door. This isn't bad for a pleasurable, reliable vehicle entering its teenage years. I've owned and driven autos from GM, Ford, Chrysler, Honda, and Mercedes-Benz. My current buddy, the '11 CR-V, is by far the most reliable and most pleasurable to drive--especially in a blizzard, grin. I believe that my CR-V and I will will be "friends" well into its "twenties".

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next