Junkyard Find: 1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

What was the most fuel-efficient (mass-produced, internal combustion-powered, highway-legal, non-gray-market, four-wheeled, et freakin' cetera) new car available in the United States during the 1980s? No, not the Toyota Starlet or Corolla Tercel, not the Honda CRX HF, not the Subaru Justy. It was the Chevrolet Sprint ER, and I've found a nicely intact example in a car graveyard just east of Sacramento.

If you want to be picky, the 1986 Sprint ER was the gas-mileage king of 1980s America, rated at 44 city and 53 highway miles per gallon. The 1987 Sprint ER came in second place, due to its insatiable thirst for go-go juice on the highway (51 miles per gallon).

In order to win the United States MPG crown for the 1985 through 1987 model years (for 1988, the Sprint Metro replaced the Sprint ER), the Sprint ER had a taller final drive gear ratio and a stingier camshaft than the regular Sprint.

It also had an upshift light (located in the lower right corner of the cluster) to remind drivers that fuel economy was more important than brisk acceleration.

Even though memories of the gas lines and fuel rationing of 1979 were still vivid by 1987, oil prices crashed hard during the middle 1980s, hitting bottom in 1986.

The MSRP for the regular '87 Sprint 3-door was $5,995, while the fuel-sipping Sprint ER 3-door listed at $6,110 (that's $16,593 and $16,912 in 2023 dollars). Not many Sprint shoppers were willing to pay the extra 115 smackers to get the ER's 47 combined miles per gallon instead of the base Sprint's 39 combined miles per gallon.

As I was contemplating the first Sprint ER I've seen in at least a couple of decades, the Air Force Thunderbirds screamed overhead as they practiced for the California Capital Airshow.

Less flashy Air Force hardware also roared by, since the junkyards of Rancho Cordova are beneath the flight path to Travis Air Force Base (which was named Fairfield-Suisun Air Force base until a B-29 carrying a "Fat Man" atomic bomb crashed and burned there, killing Brigadier General Robert F. Travis).

The heart of the Sprint was a carbureted 1.0-liter Suzuki three-cylinder engine, rated at 49 horsepower. The next-generation version of this car, the Geo Metro XFi, was the final new production car available in the United States with under 50 horses, using a fuel-injected version of the same Suzuki three-banger.

It appears that this engine was not legal for sale in high-altitude areas.

A five-speed manual was mandatory equipment on the 1987 Sprint ER. Other Sprint models could be purchased with optional automatics that year.

Back in its Japanese homeland, this car was known as the Suzuki Cultus. The second-generation version appeared here in 1989, badged as the Geo Metro. After the Geo brand got the axe in 1997, the Metro became a Chevrolet. Note the black rectangle on the hood; that's the hood release, not a badge.

The Sprint was nowhere near the cheapest new car Americans could buy in 1987. That honor went to the $3,990 Yugo GV, followed by the tied-for-second-place $4,995 Hyundai Excel 3-door hatchback and $4,995 Chevrolet Chevette (yes, new Chevettes were available that late). The Volkswagen Fox, base Subaru 3-door and Plymouth Horizon America undercut the Sprint's price as well.

As even the most miserable econoboxes got heavier and more powerful in later years, the 1986 Sprint ER's fuel-economy numbers seemed untouchable. The original Honda Insight beat it, but it needed a gasoline-electric hybrid powertrain plus a lot of cutting-edge aerodynamic and weight-reduction tricks to pull it off.

The Sprint ER shouldn't be compared to modern hybrids or EVs, though. It achieved its efficiency on straight internal combustion and did it with a carburetor.

Driving a Sprint ER from Los Angeles to New York with three passengers sounds like a nightmare. Just $66 with gas priced at $1.16 per gallon.

Also a better deal than seven horses (the hoofed variety).

Crushes the Hyundai Excel.

It loves to run!

In Canada, this car was badged as the Pontiac Firefly.

The Cultus was available with air conditioning, which would have been nice for those humid Japanese summers.

Versions of this generation of Cultus were sold everywhere, thanks to the long reach of the GM Empire

1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER in California junkyard.

1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER in California junkyard.

1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER in California junkyard.

1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER in California junkyard.

1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER in California junkyard.

1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER in California junkyard.

1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER in California junkyard.

1987 Chevrolet Sprint ER in California junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 41 comments
  • ChristianWimmer ChristianWimmer on Oct 30, 2023

    When you think about it it’s amazing how efficient the ICE has become. Back in the day of this Chevy Sprint you could only get such fuel economy by reducing the horsepower, cylinders, engine capacity and stuffing that engine into something small and light.


    Today? I mean on Saturday I had to drive to a photo shoot precisely 160 km (100 miles) outside of Munich. I drive a 2018 Mercedes A250 AMG Line (W177) with a turbocharged 2.0 4-cylinder, 224-horsepower, 7-DCT (Double Clutch) and FWD. My car was fully loaded with heavy photographic gear including several heavy batteries for my Elinchrom 1200W portable flashes. The entire trunk and rear seats were filled with my equipment which means WEIGHT.


    And yet my average fuel economy for 100 km was 6.6 liters (a solid 35 mpg). Sure, it’s not touching the fuel economy of the Chevy Sprint, but this involved spending almost 30 minutes in Munich traffic before reaching the Autobahn and then cruising at 140 km/h (87.5 mph) with several ventures into the 160-200 km/h zones in a car overloaded with heavy photographic equipment. That’s phenomenal fuel economy. Right now I am drinking water out of a 1.5 liter bottle. They are not very big and when you think about it… my car needed 4.5 bottles (1.5 liters each) to drive 100 km. Insane. As far as I am concerned this whole “But gasoline ICE engines are only 25-35% efficient in thermodynamics!” claim is irrelevant these days. Seriously.


    Pic of my ride, her name is… “Priscilla”. 😆


    • See 1 previous
    • Aquaticko Aquaticko on Oct 31, 2023

      Definitely one of those things that make you wonder how fuel efficient cars would be with modern tech if ONLY modern safety design/gear had been added. My ‘20 Sonata hybrid’s averaged ~49mpg (my calculations) over 40k miles, but it’s a bigger car than I really need and obviously more complex, and compared to the ‘06 Forester it replaced, it’s much smoother and quieter.

      These days, anything under 300hp is slow, noisier and rougher than a Lexus ES is unrefined, smaller than a Tahoe cramped. People don’t want cars anymore, they want mobile living rooms








  • Everett Morgan Griffiths Everett Morgan Griffiths on Oct 30, 2023

    My dad had one of these,tiny tinny little thing that he towed behind a motorhome then drove for years afterwards, from a different era of automobiles, nobody would accept the lack of amenities today


  • NJRide Mitsu is grabbing some market share in lower income areas (I have been doing analysis for my dealer in North Central NJ). They probably need the budget and subprime angle for any relevance
  • Bookish QOTD: Should There Be More Sedans?No. There should be more coupes and convertibles.First they came for the convertibles, and I said nothing because I didn't have a convertible.Then they came for the coupes, and I said nothing because I didn't have a coupe.Finally they came for my sedan, and no one spoke for me.
  • Henry The manufacturers should build what the market demands. Sedans are dying off because crossovers offer sedan ride sedan handling sedan mpg and MUCH more utility. When you look at a "crossover" its like the shell of a car from the 30s and 40s with an upright stance, great visability, lots of headroom and easy entry/exit while modern sedans follow the low wide slung back form factor of the late 50s to now sedans. I personally went from a grand marquis (awesome utility awrsome passenger room) to a honda accord (awsome passenger room crappy utility compared to a grand marquis) and when i think i could have grand marquis passenger room, grand marquis utlity, and accord mpg you know what I want? A honda crv. Thats why crossovers are winning. Theyre a better grand marquis.
  • MKizzy Even if the bulk of Malibu sales were to fleets, they were still a valuable source of modern affordable used vehicles for their second and third owners. With the most affordable GM and Ford vehicles powered by 3cyl turbos, used examples are more likely to be problematic. With the Escape also being dead if reports are true, the question is what comparable GM or Ford vehicles will fleet customers gravitate to post-Malibu? Will rental car agencies have to rethink their vehicle size categories as they're stuck purchasing lookalike compact CUVs.
  • AZFelix Sedans will continue to be replaced by CUVs and SUVs. The now omnipresent and bloated two-box shape will be considered 'normal' for passenger vehicles for current and future generations. The utility of the extra cargo volume of a CUV when compared to a three-box design may at times be questionable but they have some advantage. The embracing of the ease of entry and egress in CUV/SUVs by the elderly will likely morph into a disdain for the design by more youthful generations of buyers. What teenager wants to be caught driving a 'grandma' car? I suspect that this impression will lead to resurgence of trim and (comparatively) low slung sports wagons and hatchbacks in the near future. I look forward to their return.
Next