UAW Reaches Tentative Deal With All Detroit Automakers, Striking Ends

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The United Auto Workers have reached a tentative agreement with all three Detroit automakers. Ford was the first to strike a deal, followed by Stellantis. But General Motors wasn’t far behind and managed to settle things with the union early Monday morning. Based on comments from select UAW members in the know, the final issue reportedly revolved around EV battery plants.


The issue came up relatively early in the union’s “stand-up strike” that began on September 15th. By early October, there were concerns that employees working at the automotive sector’s new battery facilities (many of which are jointly operated with foreign suppliers) likewise needed to be covered by labor agreements.


The deal with Stellantis was announced on Saturday and is said to mimic the terms the union already had negotiated with Ford. While we’ve covered the topic, specifics on the deal are still forthcoming and likely won’t be fully known to the public until after it’s been ratified by voting union members. The UAW effectively turned up the pressure on all automakers in recent weeks, targeting their most lucrative facilities for expanding labor strikes.


GM’s last facility to see a walkout was the incredibly important Spring Hill Manufacturing located in Tennessee. The site is responsible for several Cadillac and GMC-branded crossover vehicles. But its most important role is putting together powertrains and body panels for some of the automakers’ highest-volume models. Workers were told to abandon their posts on Saturday, not long after striking wrapped for Stellantis.


It was apparently too much for the company to endure and news broke early on Monday that General Motors (now standing alone against the UAW) had likewise reached a tentative contract agreement with the union. The last hurdle was rumored to be the inclusion of Ultium Cells LLC (a joint venture between GM and South Korea’s LG Energy Solution) in the UAW’s master contract. This would effectively set the stage to make unionization easier at subsequent battery plants.


As with the Stellantis agreement, we’re expecting the union contract with General Motors to be based closely on the deal made with Ford. That includes a 25-percent wage increase over the duration of a contract that won’t expire until 2028, the reinstatement of cost-of-living adjustments that were dumped in 2009, improved profit-sharing with workers, faster employee progression to the top wage tier, and eventual abolishment of tier wage scales over the next four years.


There will also be an immediate pay bump for all unionized employees. For GM, that equates to an 11 percent increase in wages within the first year. That should put the average employee just north of $35 per hour by 2024 and set the stage for that number to reach $45 per hour by 2028.


The union also won improved job guarantees. However, these will vary between automakers. GM seems to be offering ways of transitioning employees over to EV facilities as it gradually abandons combustion vehicles. Though there’s a lot of room to speculate how that will work at this stage.


There will also be investment guarantees that will be made known as more details are shared ahead of the ratification votes. Thus far, we’re only aware of Ford’s plan — which includes $2.1 billion for Ohio Assembly (with some of that going toward electric vans); $1.2 billion for Louisville Assembly (with some slated for new EVs and hybrid models of existing cars); $1 billion in Kansas City Assembly; and $900 million set aside to maintain localized F-Series production.


A UAW national council vote is anticipated for later this week regarding GM, with voting likely to take place beforehand on the other tentative agreements. If approved, the terms will be handed off to local union leaders who will present it to general members that will ultimately decide whether or not the deals are ratified. Ratification bonuses are included in all three deals, encouraging union members to take the deal and net themselves a few thousand dollars instantly.


While striking will undoubtedly resume if any of the above deals fall through, it seems as though union actions are probably over for 2023. UAW President Shawn Fain has been bragging about how the current contract proposals have broken union records and represent a restoration of ground lost over the last few decades. Granted, there is a contingency of union members who seem confident sweeter deals could be negotiated. But they look to be in the minority. Regardless, it’s undoubtedly wiser for all members to wait until they’ve seen the proposals in full before taking any formal stance.


Considering automakers were claiming to be losing hundreds of millions of dollars in lost revenue per week due to strike conditions before the UAW began targeting their most important factories, it’s unlikely they’re interested in seeing any more factory downtime either. That same is true for auto parts suppliers, which have had to endure layoffs and some production stops of their own while things were sorted out with the UAW.


Expect formal announcements to be made by the union and each of the three automakers involved over the coming days.


[Image: UAW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 117 comments
  • Crown Crown on Nov 02, 2023

    EBFlex, can you not read yourself and discern what each poster is saying. I shouldn't have to run a name roster for you. Do your own work.

  • Crown Crown on Nov 02, 2023

    Daniel J, It is the CEO's job to show those stockholders what they can do to maximize profits: Look we cut our employee compensation; Look we substituted this cheap fifty cent part for that high quality part was costing us $3.

  • 3-On-The-Tree Another observation during my time as a firefighter EMT was that seatbelts and helmets do save lives and reduce injury. And its always the other person getting hurt.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Jeff, Matt Posky, When my bike came out in 1999 it was the fastest production motorcycle in the world, 150 HP 197 top speed, 9.57 quarter mile Hayabusa peregrine falcon etc. This led to controversy and calls for high-speed motorcycles to be banned in order to avoid increasingly fast bikes from driving on public roads. This led to a mutual decision nicknamed the “ gentleman’s agreement” to limit bikes to 186mph, ending the production bike speed contest for all bikes 2000 and upward. Honestly once your over a buck 20 it’s all a blur. Most super cars can do over or close to 200mpg, I know at least on paper my 09 C6 corvette LS3 tops out at 190mph.
  • 3-On-The-Tree In my life before the military I was a firefighter EMT and for the majority of the car accidents that we responded to ALCOHOL and drugs was the main factor. All the suggested limitations from everyone above don’t matter if there is a drunken/high fool behind the wheel. Again personal responsibility.
  • Wjtinfwb NONE. Vehicle tech is not the issue. What is the issue is we give a drivers license to any moron who can fog a mirror. Then don't even enforce that requirement or the requirement to have auto insurance is you have a car. The only tech I could get behind is to override the lighting controls so that headlights and taillights automatically come on at dusk and in sync with wipers. I see way too many cars after dark without headlights, likely due to the automatic control being overridden and turned to "Off". The current trend of digital or electro-luminescent dashboards exacerbates this as the dash is illuminated, fooling a driver into thinking the headlights are on.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh given the increasing number of useless human scumbags who use their phones while driving (when it is not LIFE AND DEATH EMERGENCY) there has to be a trade off.It is either this, or make phone use during driving a moving violation that can suspend a license.
Next