Are Rising EV Inventories Proof Nobody Wants Them?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Those who follow the automotive industry will have undoubtedly noticed that dealer inventories are slowly approaching levels that would have been considered normal before the pandemic. While this is presumably good news for people who have absolutely had it with dealerships marking up their products, some are growing concerned by how much electric vehicle inventories are outpacing their gasoline-reliant counterparts.

Despite elevated fuel prices, aggressive marketing, and most companies vowing to transition toward building electrified automobiles exclusively, America has an EV supply of more than 100 days on dealer lots. That’s about double the average for gasoline vehicles. While it would seem that people are losing interest in battery-driven automobiles, industry experts are claiming that all is not as it seems.


While alleged experts have certainly proven their fallibility in recent years, there are reasons to buy into the claim. Things are often less simple than they appear on their face and EVs certainly qualify. For starters, the market share of electrified autos has continued to increase.


The Department of Energy has reported that the U.S. share of battery electric vehicles has grown from a negligible fraction of a percent to over 6 percent between 2018 and 2023. Take rates for plug-in hybrids have also increased, albeit at a much slower rate. It’s definitely not happening at the pace that the Biden administration wanted, as the White House set a goal of making half of new-vehicle sales electric by 2030. But we’re still moving gradually in that direction.


There’s also a large disparity in what’s popular among EVs. Some models aren’t very competitive and effectively exist as compliance vehicles. Others are global models that are poorly suited to the North American market (too small, bad range). Then there are the premium luxury models that trade on offering more features, larger batteries, and cultural cachet. The point is that the segment hasn’t fully matured and currently caters to wealthier consumers who see these as status vehicles.


However, government incentives (EV tax credits) have made them more attractive in the general sense. The Tesla Model Y may still be on the pricier side of affordable EVs, lack the fit-and-finish of other models, and be a little too barren inside for some tastes. But it’s no more expensive than the average automobile sold today after tax credits are accounted for, wears a desirable badge, and stresses the fundamentals of what makes EVs desirable in the first place. That’s been enough to make it one of the top ten best-selling automobiles in North America.


Tesla is still mopping the floors with other EV providers and it seems to stem from a mix of product design, careful pricing, and offering consumers a sense of exclusivity. The latter item is something that’s been bolstered by the way Tesla products are sold. While rival brands now have electric cars sitting around the lot, Tesla forces its customers to wait until the vehicle can be delivered.


Surplus inventories aren’t a great way to make something appear desirable. But Tyson Jominy, vice president of data and analytics at J.D. Power, recently told Automotive News this is the result of supply chain improvements. Due to how the world handled the pandemic, supply chains were left in shambles and everyone claimed to be unable to meet demand for years. That appears to be changing now, with Jominy suggesting it has contributed to rising EV inventories.


"The story that demand for EVs is slowing is patently false," he said.


Cox Automotive inventory data showed 103 days' supply of EVs through June. But that doesn’t include Tesla models due to the fact that they’re not solid using the dealership model.


It’s not the only big disparity in the data. As previously noted, there’s a pretty big gap between which electric models are popular and that gap is reflected in terms of supply.

From Automotive News:


Days' supply tallies vary by model. For example, Cox's averages by model ranged from 23 days, for the Chevrolet Bolt EUV, to 181 days for the Nissan Ariya. Most EV models had more than 100 days' supply, Cox said.
GM spokesman Jim Cain said the typical days' supply calculation looks backward and can obscure what's really going on in the market for a specific vehicle. For example, to calculate the days' supply at the start of August, July's month-end inventory would be divided by July's sales, then multiplied by the number of selling days in July. J.D. Power’s calculation is slightly different, always multiplying by 30 days, rather than the number of selling days in a given month.
"If you have low sales, which is common for vehicles that are launching, and rising inventory, which is also expected for launch vehicles, you get a high days' supply number," Cain said. "The reading can be further misleading if a significant amount of that inventory is in transit to dealers and not available for sale."
Days' supply figures tell the inventory story best when the product is in a steady state, said Chris Harto, senior policy analyst at Consumer Reports. With EVs, some automakers are shutting down plants and struggling with production hiccups, while others have increased U.S. production beyond the level of demand.
"There are some issues ... driving really significant conclusions from one point in time," Harto said.


There are also broad disparities in terms of where interest is coming from. Coastal metropolitan hubs tend to see greater demand for all-electric vehicles than anywhere else in the United States. Rural areas are less interested due to there being lackluster charging infrastructure and lower-income households. Regions with particularly cold winters also seem hesitant to embrace electrification, as driving ranges tend to vary widely at extreme temperatures.


Though there are certainly exceptions. Your author currently lives in the woods where you’d expect to see a lot of gasoline-powered pickups and SUVs. They’re certainly prevalent. But there are enough wealthy neighbors and nearby cities to guarantee above-average EV sales.


Even in California, where emission standards are higher than the rest of the nation and electric cars are vastly more popular, there’s a noteworthy decline in volume among dealerships located away from urban areas. Regional demand is something the industry needs to figure out as it likewise attempts to gauge overall demand for battery-powered cars.


"We are trying to balance having enough inventory and enough demand," said Sam Fiorani, vice president of vehicle forecasting at AutoForecast Solutions. "There will be points where one is ahead of the other."


But some of the optimism seems unwarranted. EV sales may be progressing steadily in places like California, which has set a firm timeline for when all automobiles sold within the state have to be electric. But other parts of the country aren’t following suit.


While this may become irrelevant as federal emissions standards reach a point that they effectively become EV mandates or fuel prices continue breaking records, there’s a subset of today’s buyers who clearly are not interested.


Their reasons span the gamut. Many don’t believe they’ll suit their lifestyle, others are concerned about serviceability, and some are skeptical about the environmental claims as new information comes out about the perils of cobalt and lithium mining. There are even people who claim they simply don’t like the feeling that EVs are being foisted upon them via regulatory pressure.


Your author is in regular contact with several people that spend their days selling automobiles. All of them have expressed difficulties selling all-electric vehicles this year. While a few attributed this to pricing disparities, every one of them noted that there is a group of shoppers that are inherently disinterested in owning a vehicle that’s wholly reliant on battery power.


But anecdotal evidence doesn’t necessarily explain why EV inventories are outpacing liquid-fueled models. It seems far more plausible that it’s a combination of everything we’ve covered thus far. But it’s certain that legacy manufacturers haven’t yet cracked the code in terms of widespread EV acceptance and may have gotten ahead of themselves here.

[Images: Nissan; General Motors; Tesla]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 180 comments
  • Tassos Tassos on Aug 13, 2023

    "nobody wants" most of the 100s of LOSER EV models made, at huge losses per vehicle, by the LEGACY makers.


    But ALMIGHTY TESLA still has excellent demand, and has the profitability to even still lower its prices to make it even greater and dominate the BEV industry even more than it does already.


    TESLAS are the APPLE of BEVs


    Every other BEVs are just Androids.


    • See 2 previous
    • Andrew mcleish Andrew mcleish on Oct 23, 2023

      Apple phones don't compare to Samsung S22 or 3.


  • Andrew mcleish Andrew mcleish on Oct 23, 2023

    This article seems to be pro EV propaganda. At a Toyota dealership last week and the high pressure push to look at electric cars only ended when i said i will never buy an electric car. Plenty electric cars on hand, 6 to 8 week wait for a real car. I would look at a hydrogen car when that pricing gets real.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next