Report: Ford Allegedly Planning More Layoffs

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford has been restructuring for years and is reportedly planning additional layoffs. Staff from multiple business units, including its combustion-focused Ford Blue division and the Model e electric vehicle unit, are supposed to be getting bad news in the coming weeks. But the number of people getting laid off isn’t supposed to match what we’ve seen before. 


According to The Wall Street Journal, the brunt of the cuts will target salaried U.S. employees. Ford itself said it has nothing to say on the matter, adding that the company aligns its staffing around the skills and expertise needed to deliver on its growth plan.


The company has previously said it wants to slash $3 billion in annual expenses by reducing complexity and dealing with high warranty costs. CEO Jim Farley has also suggested trimming unnecessary portions of Blue Oval’s gasoline engine operations. Provided he doesn’t carve out any of the profitable bits, it could be a sound strategy. But the guy also seems a little preoccupied with the EV side of the business.


Some are concerned that Ford is betting too heavily on electrification. While this could be true from an investment perspective, the company is well aware that the brunt of its present-day sales stems from combustion vehicles. It has likewise stressed the importance of its commercial vehicles and recently updated Ford Pro to encourage fleet sales and customer retention. 


From WSJ:


The number of people Ford plans to lay off in this latest round couldn’t be learned. The cuts are expected to affect employees on Ford’s gas-engine side of the business, as well as its electric-vehicle and software division, the people said.
A Ford spokesman said the company has nothing to announce.
“As we have said, part of the ongoing management of our business includes aligning our global staffing to meet future business plans, as well as staying cost competitive as our industry evolves,” he added, in a statement.
Ford Chief Executive Jim Farley has said the automaker has more work to do than its competitors to get costs in line as it spends billions of dollars to transition its lineup to electric vehicles.


The company took a pretty big hit in 2022, reporting a $2 billion net loss. While these are tough times for numerous automakers, Ford’s operational costs seem much higher than its competitors. Executives have suggested the company spends billions more than necessary to address supply chain management and warranty expenses. 


Though it’s hardly alone in stressing over finances. Stellantis and General Motors have likewise been offering employees buyouts this year — with both hoping to address mounting operating costs. 


To help cope with its own overhead, Ford laid off roughly 3,000 employees in 2022 and started 2023 by announcing it would need to reduce its European workforce by roughly 3,800 heads. The automaker has also split itself into different divisions focused on traditional combustion engines and all-new electric models. However, the latter unit is expected to lose several billion dollars this year. 


[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
13 of 60 comments
  • Ravenuer Ravenuer on Jun 24, 2023

    Ah yes, all the International Corporate Experts posting on here. I'm sure GM, Ford etc are all getting ready to beg you to come lead them.

    • See 5 previous
    • EBFlex EBFlex on Jun 27, 2023

      “Oh so you know what a source is. So did you get one for your allegation, which was noted and reported?”

      No idea what you are whining about.



  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jun 26, 2023

    ALLEGEDLY: "Reminder, Teslas have very poor build quality and are severely overpriced"

    • See 4 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jun 27, 2023

      "I do"..... Allegedly......



  • Varezhka Dunno, I have a feeling the automakers will just have the cars do that without asking and collect that money for themselves. Just include a small print in your purchasing contract.I mean, if Elon Musk thinks he can just use all the Teslas out there for his grid computing projects for free, I wouldn't be too surprised if he's already doing this.
  • Varezhka Any plans yet for Stellantis to wind down some of their dozen plus brands? I mean, most of their European brands (except Fiat and Maserati) are not only 80~90% European sales but also becoming old GM level badge jobs of each other. Lots of almost identical cars fighting within the same small continent. Shouldn't they at least go the Opel/Vauxhall route of one country, one brand to avoid cannibalization? The American brands, at least, have already consolidated with Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep/RAM essentially operating like a single brand. An Auto Union of a sort.
  • Namesakeone I read somewhere that Mazda, before the Volkswagen diesel scandal and despite presumably tearing apart and examining several Golfs and Jettas, couldn't figure out how VW did it and decided then not to offer a diesel. Later, when Dieselgate surfaced, it was hinted that Mazda did discover what Volkswagen was doing and kept quiet about it. Maybe Mazda realizes that they don't have the resources of Toyota and cannot do it as well, so they will concentrate on what they do well. Maybe Mazda will decide that they can do well with the RWD midsized sedan with the inline six they were considering a few years ago
  • IH_Fever A little math: An average, not super high end EV (like a model 3) has 70 kwh of storage assuming perfect fully charged conditions. An average 2-3 person home uses roughly 30 kwh per day. So in theory you have a little over 2 days of juice. Real world, less than that. This could be great if your normal outage is short and you're already spending $50k on a car. I'll stick with my $500 generator and $200 in gas that just got me through a week of no power. A/c, fridge, tv, lights, we were living large. :)
  • EBFlex No. The major apprehension to buying EVs is already well known. The entire premise of the bird cage liner NYT is ridiculous.The better solution to power your house when the power goes out is a generator. Far more reliable as it uses the endless supply of cheap and clean-burning natural gas.
Next