Ferrari Patents Augmented Reality System Designed to Merge Real and Virtual Racing

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ferrari has filed a patent with the United States Patent and Trademark Office that leverages augmented reality to allow real-world racing to crossover into the virtual realm. By using wireless networks and the real vehicle’s positional data, Ferrari thinks it can replicate it on screens at home with a high degree of accuracy.

But the really slick stuff comes into play once that experience is replicated the other way round. The special interface device the automaker has filed its patent for also replicates virtual vehicles competing against it via an advanced head-up display (HUD) and some feedback features made possible by electronic controls.


With modern vehicles lacking direct, physical connections between controls and the relevant systems, Ferrari can have real vehicles bumping into virtual ones and responding accordingly. All the individual components required to make something like this possible already exist. The company would simply need to develop the necessary software allowing the above to happen in a manner that wouldn’t be unsafe.


While electronic controls do offer simplified vehicle architectures, adaptive levels of performance, and novel concepts like what we’re talking about here, serious drivers have bemoaned the lack of feedback they offer. Electronic brakes have to simulate pedal feel, making it difficult to anticipate brake fade. Electronic steering has to simulate resistance and feedback from the road, making it harder to understand how the vehicle is actually responding to your inputs. But they’re absolutely necessary if you want to create a virtual analog of a real-world vehicle.


Though just knowing that connected cars can be controlled in this manner does open up a lot of questions about security. Considering that Ferrari’s idea would also allow the computer system to “bump” a physical vehicle based on virtual inputs from someone operating remotely, one wonders how that could be misused by bad actors.



Based on reporting from CarBuzz, Ferrari hasn’t yet reached the point where it will need to address those issues. For now, it just wants to ensure it owns the rights to the relevant concept.


From CarBuzz:


Whether via a 3D model or render, the driver of the road car will be able to see a projection of the virtual car as if it were on the track alongside them. The design goes so far as to project the virtual vehicle in the road car's wing mirror if its position is behind the road car.
If contact occurs between the road car and the virtual car, the driver of the road car will sense this via haptic feedback in the seat or steering wheel. Depending on where the contact takes place, the driver of the real car will even feel a deflection in the vehicle's trajectory, as if actual physical contact between two cars has occurred.
The real-time data transfer will likely be one of the greatest challenges for this invention to work, with Ferrari mentioning 5G and even 6G connectivity and a latency of under 500 milliseconds.
The competing driver sitting in front of their gaming console will perceive the real car as a virtual competitor, even though it's a real car being driven in real time. Although it all sounds quite complex, the basic technologies are already in place to make such a racing method plausible, and other manufacturers have also dabbled in virtual reality high-performance driving.


It’s not a terrible idea. BMW floated a similar concept with its ///M Mixed Reality that uses goggles to add virtual obstacles and imagery to people driving on real tracks. Audi and Porsche (along with a few other brands) have also toyed with using vehicle controls and headsets for racing games to be played inside a stationary vehicle.


Ferrari’s concept just takes things a bit further and presumably dumps the clunky headgear. It’s hoping to leverage the tech to enhance the ownership experience and bolster its community. The company notes in its patent filing that most of its customers aren’t professional racing drivers and aren’t likely to qualify for a lot of events or even have the time to schedule regular track days.


This limits competition, which Ferrari believes is important. But the patent is supposed to create opportunities for friends to race together more often while also giving everyone a little extra practice.


It’s not uncommon for driving enthusiasts to overestimate their skill level behind the wheel, especially on vehicles they have limited experience with. We want to believe climbing into the cockpit of an absolute monster of a car will translate into a driving display so good that onlookers cannot help but weep. But the reality is that you need to familiarize yourself with the vehicle as much as the roads you’ll be driving on.


Unfortunately, that can be exceedingly difficult when the car in question boasts an extremely high performance threshold that can’t be touched anywhere outside of a racetrack. Ferrari knows this and is hoping to create more opportunities to give its customers and their friends those kinds of experiences.

It’s something that certainly would have seemed like a stupid gimmick a decade earlier. However, we know that modern racing simulators have reached a point where there is some very real skill overlap taking place. It’s literally the plot of the 2023 Gran Turismo film, which is based on a true story where Nissan used the titular racing sim to help fill the roster of its professional driving team.


What Ferrari wants is to utilize those advanced racing rigs automotive enthusiasts already have in their homes to bridge and bring them into real-world events that are happening in real time.


Assuming it works as intended, the implications of this technology could be massive. While I wouldn’t call any of the people I know with a Ferrari in the garage my friend, I could see myself strapping in at home to virtually compete in televised motorsport events and even paying extra for the privilege.


We actually kind of saw this happening when racing was stopped during the pandemic. With tracks closed, drivers used home simulators to keep their skills sharp and it wasn’t long before they were competing in events with random strangers over the internet. Motorsport organizers are likewise constantly seeking new ways of engaging the audience and the above seems like an idyllic solution — especially if they’re hoping to snag younger people.


It’ll be exciting to see if this patent filing turns into something tangible. While all the individual components seem to be there, it’s often easier said than done to bring it all together. However, Ferrari has some very exciting ideas that could fundamentally change how we experience motorsport.


[Images: USPTO; Ferrari]



Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Sep 28, 2023

    "augmented reality" Isn't that a mamoplasty?

  • El scotto El scotto on Sep 28, 2023

    Ferrari develops a way to put a virtual car in real time traffic? Will it be multiple virtual players in a possible infinite number of real drivers in real time situations?


    This will be one of the greatest things ever or a niche video game.

  • SCE to AUX Agree 100%.
  • Macca To me it seems like the current EV conundrum is at least partially driven by a standoff between the manufacturer and the consumer, complicated by regulations (and the laws of physics). There is an identity crisis as to the ideal EV. To some, it is a decidedly non-luxury city-friendly compact that isn’t intended for long highway trips – these have struggled to consistently find buyers in the US. To others, they’re still mostly viewed as a luxury toy – perhaps their ideal is a $250k luxury sedan with 1,234 HP that can blast to 60 MPH in 1.9 seconds, or even a 8,600 lb SUV. We see more excitement toward the latter end of the spectrum – with such examples occupying the same spot as the ultra-lux/sports/’fun’ car of yesteryear. To me, EVs make more sense on the humble side of the spectrum, but wealthy buyers don't want to merely eek along with the hoi polloi in a tiny EV. I don’t bemoan choice, after all, ICE runs a similar gamut from the Mirage to the Chiron. It does appear, though, that the would-be Leaf-class buyer continues to be alienated (a group admittedly middling in number). Those considering a $29k Leaf seem to either find an efficient ICE/hybrid (perhaps a $24k Corolla Hybrid or $28k Camry Hybrid) -or- they have the funds to move up to a newer platform/larger/more powerful/greater range EV in a higher price bracket. A Leaf in the driveway, after all, doesn’t stoke envy – to most folks it looks like a Versa hatch – at best you might get a hug from a polar bear. Some of the legacy automakers drawing the deepest line in the sand on ending ICE (Jaguar, for example) are already extreme niche marques struggling to maintain a brand identity (and to move metal). If your aging lineup is already a toy/luxury purchase and sales are floundering, why not attempt a rebirth to cater to the high-end EV buyer? Folks are lined up none-deep to buy the $73k I-Pace – so is there a budding Jaguar-EV owner base? There seems to be a bit of survivorship bias in that some manufacturers see ‘strong’ sales in the upper-5-figure $$ register of EVs and think that’s the heart of the market. Instead, it seems that the still-exotic nature of EVs skews EV-intending consumers to higher tax brackets (and thusly higher-end EVs). Tesla has seemingly pulled off an established, diverse lineup with some 'affordable' models. Hyundai has made decent sales with the Ioniq 5The Big [s]Three[/s] Two are struggling with brand identity and approach (as usual). EVs aren’t mainstream enough to acquire the economy buyer at scale (yet?) so I would, as others have said, take a MOR approach with hybrids like Toyota and let other mfg's step on the rake. Rumors of ICE's death are greatly exaggerated.
  • Rover Sig The list of reasons why EVs are not good for much - except golf carts and urban delivery vehicles/short range commuter cars - is lengthy and compelling. And the electrical grid - in many areas still dependent on coal - won't be able to support them. I remembers when the example from enlightened Europe was "go diesel" and American car builders tried that on us. Today, diesel is dead for private automobiles, and the hysteria has moved on to EVs. Better, cheaper fuels await the day the government regulators allow the market to operate freely and give up on telling us what to drive.
  • Redapple2 Fine cars, I m sure. I ll take a 911.
  • Ajla I have an acquaintance that inherited one of these when his father passed away. It's a 390 and quite original but also needs some TLC.Despite me and my pals being capable folks he refuses to let us work on it, even with free labor involved. So it just sits under a tarp in his garage slowly rotting away and eventually some chucklef*ck will get a "barn find" after he dies himself.
Next