Drive Notes: 2023 Ford F-150 Tremor

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

I just tested a 2023 Ford F-150 Tremor -- yes, 2023s are still in the press fleets and this isn't unusual, no big deal -- which is supposed to split the difference between the badass off-roader Raptor and the "regular" F-150.

Does it do that? Read on.


As usual, we do this pro/con style.

Pros

  • While I still think Ram offers the best truck interiors on the market, Ford is not far behind. The digital gauges are clean and easy to read with big font, and the large infotainment system is similarly a breeze to read, and a breeze to use.
  • Knobs! Buttons! Big ones! Thank you, Ford, for keeping it simple.
  • The highway ride is surprisingly supple and smooth considering the 33-inch all-terrain tires. Tire noise is relatively suppressed, too.
  • V8s are dying, and that probably has to happen (except, maybe, for sports cars and HD trucks), but man the sound and acceleration will be missed.
  • The inside is spacious. Not a shock, this isn't news, but it's worth remarking on.
  • I still dig the laptop-friendly center-console. Even if the folding shifter seems gimmicky.
  • Ford infotainment has come leaps and bounds in recent years.

Cons

  • Trucks have gotten larger, and that makes urban and suburban life, especially parking, difficult. I literally used the truck as an excuse to skip the gym since I couldn't park it in the tiny, crowded lot. It wouldn't have fit in some spaces, and for other spaces, maneuvering in and out would be a nightmare.
  • The fuel economy numbers were in the mid-teens. I've seen worse in big, powerful trucks, to be fair. On the other hand, I did a fair amount of highway driving so the number should be higher. At least the range is well over 500 miles.
  • Handling, as you'd expect, suffers a little, though not as much as you'd expect.
  • The $75K that Ford asks for this thing is a bit eye-popping. I understand the popularity of pickups drives pricing but it still makes you do a double-take.

I am not sure who this trim is for -- I guess the F-150 owner who does a lot of on-road driving with some light but mildly taxing off-roading (aside from the tires, the Tremor package offers tow hooks and monotube shocks). If it were me, I'd probably select a different trim for on-road driving and splurge on the Raptor if I went off-road a lot. But if you do select the Tremor, it gives you a bit more off-road ability without major on-road sacrfices.

[Images © 2024 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Carsofchaos Styling is subjective, there are plenty of uglier cars out there (I'm looking at you, Lexus). But then again, I think 1958 Oldsmobiles are beautiful & have a man-crush on the Aztek, so I'm probably not the best person to ask if a car is good looking or not.
  • Zerofoo Any car with these types of mods has been run hard. Count on an engine rebuild on top of the ridiculous asking price.
  • Zerofoo I'm as interested in EVs as I am about my next washer and dryer set. Most are completely uninteresting and forgettable appliances.
  • Redapple2 Nice/Pluses[list][*]Armrest with raised island for cupholder / gear selector. Open Floorboard.[/*][*]Luxo cloth instead of leather.[/*][/list]Bad[list][*]No Carplay[/*][*]Black roof. Top 1/2 of car disappears.[/*][*]C to D pillar. What the hell is going on with the slashes on the glass?[/*][*]C pillar cut line make it impossible to get in the rear seat. FAIL.[/*][*]Rear style is a trainwreck. Upper and lower tail lamps. Sharply angled back light. Too much like Lyric whatever.[/*][*]Carbon fiber mimic looks like my friggin egg carton inside. [/*][/list]I dislike this car greatly.PS- the novelty of screen-heavy interiors have worn off at this point and will look dated far sooner than their more-analog counterparts.................... I never thought of this point. But, I think it is very true. Wise. Far Sighted.
  • Jalop1991 it looks like this car might be following the lead of the Prius in dictating to the buyers that "you don't need no stinkin' rear wiper", never mind that it's a freaking HATCHBACK.For reference, find a video about the Toyota digital rear view mirror--the video that shows it on the RAV. Note the part about how they specifically talk about how the rear wiper cleans up to that particular camera space on the rear window. Now ask yourself, what about the Prius? Nah. We'll sell you that feature, but it'll be useless unless you stop frequently to manually keep that area clear as you drive through the mountains in winter.Yeah, hatchbacks without wipers. They need higher MPG more than you need a wiper. What's next?But no worries; it does have the vaunted "Mondrian-patterned rear quarter-window graphic (that) fades to the rear, strengthening the fastback effect and low roofline".
Next