Build & Price Appears for 2024 Ford F-150

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

A revamping of this nation’s best-selling vehicle (well, the half-ton portion of those numbers, anyway) is always worth a few words. The build-and-price tool for the 2024 Ford F-150 is now live, meaning we can poke around in what Ford asserts is a streamlined ordering process in which the number of buildable combinations has been cut by 90 percent compared to last year.


Make no mistake, though – there are still plenty of permutations, enough to confuffle newcomers to the truck game who are trading out of an SUV in search of an Even More Rugged image. Our nickel’s worth of free advice is to study the pickup’s window sticker as thoroughly as one would examine tax forms. That way, you won’t accidentally drive off in an F-150 which can’t tow the family RV thanks to the wrong rear-end gear.


At its core, a base regular cab XL now starts at $36,570 which is up from $33,835. However, that miserable naturally aspirated V6 boat anchor has finally been put out to pasture, replaced by the 2.7-liter EcoBoost as the new entry-level engine. Equally equipped, this year’s base XL is $1,450 dearer than before. Given the inclusion of other gear like the 12-inch infotainment screen, not to mention simple inflation, that’s within reason. Economies of scale are a wonderful thing.


Back in the mainstream, a four-wheel drive XLT SuperCrew with the short box now commands a minimum of $53,840. Equivalently powered by the now-standard 2.7L EcoBoost, the same truck would have put a $52,735 dent in one’s bank account. Again, reasonable jumps given the better infotainment as standard and the intangible benefit of lording your newly-styled ’24 over yer neighbor’s ’23, a truck which obviously must now be sent through an industrial-sized shredder.


Raptor is also up about twelve hundred bucks at the base level, while little-bro Tremor packs about twice that increase before any other options are added. Ford has rejiggered the top of its F-150 pyramid, with the Platinum sitting atop all alone now and not having to fight for space with the Limited. Presumably, moneyed types preferred the P L A T I N U M billboard on the leading edge of that trim’s hood but disliked the idea it wasn’t affixed to the top trim. 


What would this author select, given a mandate of keeping somewhat of a lid on costs and not going straight to Raptor? At the risk of sounding like an old man, an XLT SuperCrew 4x4 with the long box is appealing because I would definitely want the 3.5L PowerBoost hybrid engine simply for the stunningly affordable ($750) 7.2kW generator in its bed. Slap on a $785 tow/haul package for extra capability plus a $1,095 FX4 package to call it a day. And I’d add the $410 illuminated Ford logo because I am indeed That Guy. Leave the big-bucks moonroof and BlueCruise on the factory floor. Painted in Atlas Blue, that’s just over 60 grand with a few bucks set aside to retrofit BFGoodrich KO2s and color-match the bumpers on delivery. Until they decide to make PowerBoost available in a Tremor, it is my pick.


That’s it. Go build your own.


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 9 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Sep 19, 2023

    You can't get body-color bumpers without being saddled with ugly black wheels anymore. I'm not in the market for a truck but I find that sad.


    If I actually did buy one I'd have to figure out a wheel swap with another owner.

  • Art_Vandelay Art_Vandelay on Sep 19, 2023

    Wow. To replace my truck with an identically speced one would cost 20k more than it did in 2015.

  • ChristianWimmer US-spec 380SLs were especially asthmatic thanks to the emissions regulations. In Europe these were considered quite “quick” and powerful. They are slow cars by todays standards but excellent cruisers so this 380SL is perfect for someone who just wants a solid, open-top cruiser and not a weekend drag racer.IIRC the 560SL had a torque advantage over the European 500SL, but the 500SL was ultimately the quicker car.I own an ‘89 500SL R129 and despite the 326-horsepower torquey V8, it’s 0-100 km/h “performance” is held back by the 4-speed automatic and 2-ton weight. Even in their day these cars were not intended for drag racing or 0-100 km/h bragging times. They are cruisers meant to be enjoyed in a responsible manner. Plus, driving faster than 120-130 km/h with the top down or the soft top closed results in high wind noises for the former and a loud fluttering cloth top for the latter. As a result I drive a maximum of 110 km/h on the Autobahn with the top down or 120-130 km/h with the top up.
  • Tassos more lipstick on the pitiful pig...
  • Tassos While Summer officially starts w the Solstice around June 21-22, my summer has started on Monday May 6, when I started my ocean swimming season, a record early for me. Fortunately I think the water is warmer than in previous years (on Monday May 14, 2007, when I returned to my summer palace from a week's stay in Warsaw (the VIP treatment etc) I could not stand it, but did swim the next day May 15.
  • Tassos I will wait for the more understated, if not eliminated, fins of the 60s and 70s. Form Follows Function unless there is really good reason, and I fail to see anything more than a passing fad here. Good Riddance, glad current Caddys are not as juvenile in their excellent styling (that Art and Science or Whatever theme has already lasted a quarter century and still looks better than Bangle-d BMWs.
  • NotMyCircusNotMyMonkeys youll find another cult soon enough. it will be ok, tender snowflake. your tears will dry eventually :)
Next