Which EVs Still Qualify for Federal Tax Credits?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With the guidance having come in on the United States’ updated EV tax credit scheme, outlined in the so-called Inflation Reduction Act, we now have a pretty good idea of which electric vehicles still qualify. Stringent content requirement stipulations have certainly culled the roster, however, and helped explain why the automotive sector didn’t have any issues with the government taking its sweet time in making decisions regarding content quotas.

There are only about a dozen models that qualify for the full $7,500 tax credit after April 18th, with a few more being eligible for a partial credit of $3,750.


Vehicles approved by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) can be found by going to the fuel-economy offshoot of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) website. But it’s kind of a clunky interface so we’re just going to list them here for you.


Starting Tuesday, here are the all-electric and plug-in hybrid (PHEV) models that are eligible to receive the full $7,500 federal credit: Chevrolet Bolt and Bolt EUV (2022-23); Chrysler Pacifica Plug-in Hybrid (2022-23); Ford F-150 Lightning (2022-23); Lincoln Aviator Grand Touring (2022-23); Tesla Model Y Performance (2022); Tesla Model Y (2022-23); Tesla Model 3 Performance (2022-23); Cadillac Lyriq (2023-2024); Chevrolet Blazer (2024); Chevrolet Equinox (2024); Chevrolet Silverado (2024).


And here are the models that managed to qualify for one of the $3,750 credits: Ford Escape PHEV (2022-23); Ford Mustang Mach-E (2022-23); Ford E-Transit (2022-23); Grand Cherokee Plug-in Hybrid 4xe (2022-23); Jeep Wrangler Plug-in Hybrid 4xe (2022-23); Lincoln Corsair Grand Touring (2022-23); Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Rear-Wheel Drive (2022-23).


We recently covered why some models wouldn’t make the cut in our breakdown of why Ford was celebrating how many of its models would still qualify under the updated guidance. But it basically comes down to whether or not they can qualify for the two $3,750 credits.


The first of those is broken down into electrified automobiles that have at least 40 percent of the battery's critical mineral values extracted and/or processed within the U.S. or in a country where the U.S. has a free-trade agreement. Alternatively, the batteries can be produced from materials recycled in North America.


The other $3,750 stems from whether or not at least half the value of the EV's battery components were made (or assembled) inside North America. This was allegedly done to help support localized production after the automotive unions realized electric vehicles meant fewer hands-on assembly lines and the prospect of further labor outsourcing.


That also means a bunch of foreign-made vehicles no longer qualify. Formerly eligible models from BMW, Audi, Volkswagen, and Volvo have been bumped off the list. Even the humble Nissan Leaf has been removed. Though, perhaps more interesting, is seeing Rivian's electric trucks (the R1S and R1T) losing their eligibility — despite the vehicles themselves being assembled in Illinois.


But there are a few more hoops to jump through if you want the government to offer some cash back on your EV purchase. Eligible vans, sport utility vehicles, and pickup trucks have to come in under $80,000, while other passenger models need to retail below $55,000. Those filing for the credit also need to have a modified adjusted gross income (AGI) below $300,000 for married couples filing jointly, $225,000 for heads of households, and $150,000 for everybody else.


There are other considerations taken into account (kilowatt requirements, weight, etc.) that we don’t need to get into here. But you can find them on the IRS website.


Keep in mind that the stringency of the content requirement rules increases annually. So a vehicle that qualifies through the 2023 model year may not be eligible in 2024. There are even forthcoming provisions that would eliminate credits for vehicles using any battery components stemming from a “foreign entity of concern,” which basically means any country the U.S. government decides it doesn’t like that year.


It’s a very different situation from the 200,000-unit-per-automaker sales quota that has been supplanted. Interestingly, only General Motors and Tesla managed to hit those caps and they’re some of the biggest winners under the new scheme as well.


[Image: Jan Hendrik/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 37 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Apr 18, 2023

    Do the subsidies get taken out of the kid's pay who are mining the lithium for batteries? How about other slave labor being used to make EVs? Or the environmental impact of these things?


    Funny how externalities are rarely discussed by EV advocates.


    These people aren't as environmentally conscious as they think they are. The good news is that if they ever decide to be honest about EVs, they could always re-engage in a different cult, say working with pharmaceutical companies or large banks or.... oil companies.


  • Louis Faiella Louis Faiella on Apr 18, 2023

    How many buyers get the car and find out at tax time that they dont qualify plus they paid sales tax on the phantom rebate!!

    • See 1 previous
    • VoGhost VoGhost on Apr 19, 2023

      Yeah, I wouldn't recommend anyone get their tax advice from a car dealer.


  • JK Savoy Blue is a thing, but Sestriere White? Sestriere is a ski town near Turin, so I guess it meant to conjure up thoughts of snow. Pretty car. I hope Pininfarina has success. The industry in and around Turin has taken a big hit and is a shadow of its former self.
  • Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
  • TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
  • John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
Next