UAW Expands Strike Again, Targeting GM's Largest Plant

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Just one day after the UAW went on strike at Stellantis’ pickup factory in Sterling Heights, roughly 5,000 union members walked off the line at General Motors’ plant in Arlington, Texas. The UAW is now targeting automaker’s most-profitable facilities, with Tuesday’s walkout suggesting that the industrial game of chicken could be nearing its final act.


The union has been gradually ramping up pressure to prolong its own strike budget. But targeting domestic automaker’s valuable truck and SUV plants represents a major escalation in tactics. UAW President Shawn Fain threatened more walkouts last week in the hope that it would encourage automakers to tailor their proposed deals to align more closely with union demands. But he has also hinted that a deal may soon be reached.


Meanwhile, industry leaders have used the media to spread a message that their companies cannot give the UAW what it wants without jeopardizing subsequent investments or potentially endangering the financial health of the business. General Motors CEO Mary Barra recently said her company has already made an unprecedented offer and would refuse to agree to a contract that jeopardizes the company’s future.


Arlington Assembly is responsible for profitable models like the Chevrolet Tahoe, Chevy Suburban, GMC Yukon, and Cadillac Escalade.


The walkout came immediately after General Motors issued its earnings report, with the company announcing a net profit of just over $3 billion for the quarter. While that’s down 7 percent from the previous year, leadership said it felt confident about strong vehicle demand and pricing that would ensure desirable margins.


Fain said that GM’s offer still lags behind Ford by preserving a two-tier wage structure and offering the weakest 401(k) contributions of all three companies — hence the UAW targeting Arlington. 


Barra’s statements after news broke about the strike expansion echo her earlier position. “Accepting unsustainably high costs would put our future and GM team member jobs at risk, and jeopardizing our future is something I will not do,” the CEO said.  


It’s hard to know who to feel sorry for, let alone who might be telling the truth. 


Domestic automakers have enjoyed record-setting profits in recent years after culling small, affordable models from their lineups. While some of this was done to help circumvent stringent regulatory laws that would have been expensive to comply with, we’re also living in an era where six-figure pickup trucks aren’t uncommon. Vehicle affordability is at an all-time low while the industry seems to have been thriving due to MSRPs being at an all-time high. Companies have also invested billions into electrification and automated driving programs over the past decade without either resulting in reliable profitability in themselves. 


Automakers have likewise laid off workers since the strike began, blaming the union walkouts for the job cuts. However, rolling layoffs have been relatively common since the turn of the last century. In 2000, there were roughly 300,000 domestic auto workers. But that number had plummeted to just 140,000 by 2009. 


While employment rose consistently in successive years, peaking at 240,000 domestic employees by 2019, layoffs have returned at a staggering pace. The pandemic pushed the workforce down to just 110,000 by the end of 2020. Many jobs returned as lockdowns ended. But we’re still nowhere near the number of positions that existed beforehand and the number of assembly jobs continues to shrink. 


On the other side of the fight, we unionized workers who have spent the last few decades giving up benefits as they watched executive compensation skyrocket in relation to their own. The wage gap between labor and management looks to have reached untenable proportions, encouraging the UAW to play hardball with an industry they previously made concessions to help save only to see more jobs migrating elsewhere. 


But the union has likewise endured some criticism for its past political allegiances and has a long history of corruption that today’s leadership is striving to get away from. Previous contract negotiations have indeed been undermined by former UAW leaders accepting bribes from the industry in exchange for favorable treatment — a wrong Fain said he’s committed to correcting while in charge of the organization.  


We’ll see how it all plays out in the coming weeks. In the meantime, the industry is going to do what it can to frame the UAW as greedy and endangering domestic production while also using the strike as an excuse to continue raising prices. However, the UAW’s actions do have consequences and will eventually reach a point where its strike budget runs out. One could argue the union is asking too much and will effectively encourage the industry to build more factories outside of the United States just as easily as they could claim that the UAW is fighting against nationwide wage stagnation created by greedy multinational businesses that only care about their shareholders.


[Image: UAW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 64 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Oct 25, 2023

    More fallout:


    Ford offers unpaid leave to UAW factory workers at Louisville plant (freep.com)


    "Ford Motor Co. is offering workers personal unpaid leave from the Louisville Assembly Plant in Kentucky, which the UAW has said is directly affected by the strike at the nearby Kentucky Truck Plant, the Detroit Free Press has learned.


    In a labor relations bulletin to UAW members dated Oct. 20 and obtained by the Free Press, workers are told they may select a two-week period for unpaid leave with an application deadline of Oct. 25. They would not be eligible for unemployment payments.


    The Ford letter says the offer is open to final area assemblers only. The plant employs 3,227 hourly workers who build the Ford Escape and Lincoln Corsair, according to the Ford corporate website with plant information that was updated in mid-September."


  • Alan Alan on Oct 25, 2023

    My view is if the UAW were serious they would of stopped all vehicle production at the Big 2 and Stellantis. Not this half assed strike that is occurring.


    What is the inventory of vehicles that the Big 2 and Stellantis hold? In the olden days the corrupt Detroit manufacturers would organise via the corrupt UAW bosses strikes to allow for the reduction in inventories.

    Oh, the appearance of the UAW wanting a pay rise is a non argument. Because big pay rises are coming due to the high inflation over the past couple of years.



  • SCE to AUX Some pretty big strikes:[list][*]Drivetrain - how can a straight-6 be thrashy? Shame on you, Mazda.[/*][*]Poor fuel economy.[/*][*]Tire noise.[/*][*]Poor user interface.[/*][*]That colored dash is a bit garish for me.[/*][*]High price.[/*][*]Indistinct look in the Mazda lineup. Their SUVs are Russian nesting dolls.[/*][*]Nothing compelling to lure a buyer away from the bigger brands.[/*][/list]I don't see this moving the needle for Mazda in the US market.
  • Ash78 Dear unions, thank you for your service and for expressing interest in our automotive factories. Due to your many decades of pressuring employers to do better, the more adept companies have gotten your message and have implemented most of your demands preemptively in order to maintain a better employer-employee relationship than the manufacturing industry as a whole.We truly appreciate your feedback and interest, and all it has done to improve employer relations since the industrial revolution. We take your concerns seriously and will be glad to reach back out if our situation changes.We will keep your resume on file for three years, per company policy.Sincerely,Everyone
  • Theflyersfan I'm having a tough time figuring out Mazda's recent lineup decisions. I've mentioned before how having the CX-5 and CX-50 makes no sense as it seems like they would steal each other's sales instead of conquest sales from other brands. And now here comes the CX-70 vs 90 decision. If Mazda wanted to position the 70 above the 90 with pricing, I think they should have gone the Audi Q7 vs Q8 route. The Q8 costs more, has one fewer row, and is smaller on the inside, but has the more aggressive styling and tries to position itself as the sportier alternative large CUV in their lineup. With Mazda, the 70 and 90 seem to be in the position, like the 5 vs 50, to steal each other's sales. There isn't anything compelling me to get a 70 if I get more for my money with a 90, except 100,000 miles down the road, I won't have a folded up third row seat rattling around loosely. Mazda should have brought over the CX-60 and position that where they wanted the 70. I understand it's a touch larger than the X3, Q5, and GLC CUVs, which is a sweet spot in that market. Make the CX-70 a sportier alternative 2-row instead of such a blatant cynical move of just ripping a seat out of the 90, calling it an all new model and price it in the same ballpark. I want Mazda to succeed and continue to be independent, but decisions like these make me wonder what their future plans are.
  • Daniel J This thing is just too big and not packaged great being RWD. I'd prefer a FWD/AWD pre 2024 Santa Fe sized vehicle. A true CX-70.
  • Ash78 Now that we're on the topic, I think Apple owes us all a ton of money for bringing out new phones every 1-2 years and devaluing the one I have! /sDepreciation has always been a part of car ownership, far more so now if you're getting into EVs. I think it's just the discrete nature of these depreciation events (ie, price cuts) that have everyone wringing their hands.I'm too price sensitive -- not necessarily to BUY an EV -- but for the fear of what a truly disruptive battery tech might do to them. Split the differene with a hybrid or PHEV and you've reduced your car's reliance on battery tech as the primary determinant of value.
Next