2022 Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Ultimate – Not Quite Fully Charged

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2022 Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Ultimate Fast Facts

Powertrain
Dual electric motors, front and rear (402 horsepower, 486 lb-ft of torque)
Transmission/Drive Layout
Single-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPGe
94 city / 80 highway / 87 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, Le/100KM
2.5 city / 2.9 highway / 2.7 combined (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$58,750 (U.S.) / $72,250 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$60,540 (U.S.) / $75,650 (Canada)
Prices include $1,095 destination charge in the United States and $2,720 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

On paper, the 2022 Volvo C40 Recharge Twin Ultimate seems like a fine compact EV. And it looks cool. Yet it has quirks that detract from the experience – which would be OK if the driving dynamics were just a tick better.

“Quirky” is an adjective that’s been applied to Volvos in the past, in ways both good and bad, and it certainly applies here, though the quirks are more confounding than fun.


Let’s start with the most noticeable quirk – the lack of a button for starting the motor. When you want to drive, you sit down and weight sensors note your presence – you put your foot on the brake and pull back on the gear shift. A “ready” notice appears in the dash and you’re ready to drive.

When you park, you just put the gear selector in park and get out. It shuts down once you do.

In theory, this seems nice and convenient. But is pressing a button that hard? It’s already an EV, you’re not waiting for an internal-combustion engine to turn over and fire. I couldn’t think of a use case where needing to be in the driver’s seat with the key on your person would inconvenience you except for a scenario where a driver runs into a store and leaves passengers to play with the radio. I’ve reached out to Volvo for clarification on this and will update if I receive it.

Admittedly, this could be Ludditism (did I just make up a word?) at work – this might be one of those things that become second nature and quite natural to owners. To me, it felt like tech for the sake of tech – “Hey, we can do this, so we should, even if it’s not all that beneficial.”

Another annoying quirk involved the infotainment system and its learning curve. The good news here is that the screen is huge and easy to read. Props to Volvo for that. The bad news is that some of the menus are a bit tricky to decipher if you’re new to the brand – I found myself performing an unintended function a bit too often.

On the other hand, that may have also been a car-reviewer problem. As much as we underpaid and overfed keyboard wretches kvetch about difficult-to-operate infotainment menus, we do understand that in many cases, familiarity breeds ease of use. In other words, these problems go away once you learn the system, which any owner would in short order.

To be fair, Android phone users may find the Google-based system a bit quicker to learn than iPhone users.

Finally, like many EVs, the Volvo ditches AM radio. We’ve covered the disappearance of AM radio a lot lately, and some of you say you won’t miss it, but I still listen to sports and news on AM and found myself missing it. Save the AM radio!

I’d probably not have led the review with relatively minor complaints if the C40 was more engaging to drive. It’s got the typical EV quickness from jump – as repetitive as it might make reviews, I love how almost all EVs offer instantaneous torque – but I was let down by artificial steering feel and handling that felt a tad too ponderous for a car of this size. That’s a relative term, to be sure – the C40 does have some sprightliness. Just not quite enough. You get a sense of sport on initial turn-in, but the car could be even livelier. Again, the lack of connection from the steering wheel to the tire could be at issue here.

Handling might be a bit of a letdown, but the car’s ride is generally good, though a bit too stiff at times, especially when encountering the broken pavement that’s so common in my home city. The overall ride/handling/acceleration package isn’t bad – I don’t want to lead you astray, dear reader, and come across as too harsh – so much as that it doesn’t live up to its initial promise. You can have some fun here, but I feel like the C40 could do more with a little extra effort on Volvo’s part.

The dual electric motors (front and rear) that provide the car with all-wheel drive get their juice from a 78 kWh lithium-ion battery, and the system’s output is 402 horsepower and 486 lb-ft of torque. Again, this amount of power available on instant demand means the car’s ability to get moving from a dead stop is impressive.

Like many EVs, the C40 recharge offers one-pedal driving.

Volvo is a brand with offerings ranging from entry-luxury to full-scale luxury, and the C40 Recharge is supposed to be a reasonably-priced electric upscale urban runabout. Herein lies the true problem. The car’s driving dynamics might a bit of a letdown, but the handling is still pretty decent. There’s power on tap for acceleration. The quirks I whined about up top won’t annoy everyone. But the price tag is a bit off-putting.

The base price for my test unit was $58K. That price includes features such as the 12.3-inch gauge screen, 9-inch infotainment screen, Google services, climate pre-conditioning, Bluetooth, USB ports, wireless phone charging, LED headlights, LED fog lights, blind-spot information system with steer assist, cross-traffic alert with automatic braking for collision avoidance, collision mitigation, lane-departure alert, lane-keep assist, a fixed panoramic glass roof, heated front seats, and dual-zone climate control.

That base price included the Ultimate package, which included 20-inch wheels, heated rear seats, the aforementioned keyless drive, adaptive cruise control, a power liftgate, Harmon Kardon audio, and a heated steering wheel. So, with the $695 metallic paint and the $1,095 destination fee, the total came to $60,540.

Perhaps that’s the biggest letdown here – the C40 Recharge could be a fun, relatively affordable way to introduce buyers to EVs in general and the Volvo brand specifically. I understand that the build costs of EVs are high now and will drop as the technology spreads, but for now, it’s unfortunate that getting the ultimate recharge will cost so much.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • Haze3 Haze3 on Jun 12, 2023

    As Tim noted, quirks are fine but the price is the issue.


    In the mid-50K's, they are competing with substantially more capable vehicles (range, size, etc.) from several manufacturers. Only blind Volvo loyalty is on their side.

  • Neil  Joyce Neil Joyce on Jun 18, 2023

    Begin now earning every month an extra amount of $17k or more just by doing very simple and easy online job from home. I have received $18953 in my last month direct in my bank acc by doing this easy home base job just in my part time for 2 hrs maximum a day online. Even a child can now do this job and earns money online. Everybody can get this home job right now and start earning dollars online by follow details here……….

    Click the link—↠ https://.Worksprofit.com


  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Next