TTAC Podcast: The Best and Worst Cars with Jake Fisher of Consumer Reports

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey


We're doubling up this week after the tech issues we faced last week.

We sat down with Jake Fisher, the Senior Director of Auto Testing at Consumer Reports, to talk about their best and worst cars of 2023.

And our best and worst, of course.

Click here to check it out and listen in, and don't forget to check out CR's podcast, called TalkingCars, here.

Thanks for listening!


[Image: Honda]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 27 comments
  • Probert Probert on Jan 21, 2024
    A BEV is about 400% more efficient than an ICE car and gets around 110 - 120 egmp on the EV cycle. ICE is about 20-25% efficient (about 1 in 5 gallons of gas are actually use for propulsion, the rest is lost in heat and noise), and a BEV is around 90% efficient. On the highway, even at its most inefficient, a BEV is much much more efficient than ICE.
    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jan 21, 2024
      "gets around 110 - 120 egmp on the EV cycle." Not sure what "egmp" is other than Hyundai's name for its BEV platform but according to this J.D. there's a bit of fraud going on with BEV mileage. In case of paywall: "In all of these cases, regulators punished carmakers that had cut corners and misled the public. But when it comes to electric cars, the government has a cheating scandal of its own. That scandal, grabbing far fewer headlines, is buried deep in the Federal Register—on page 36,987 of volume 65.When carmakers test gasoline-powered vehicles for compliance with the Transportation Department’s fuel-efficiency rules, they must use real values measured in a laboratory. By contrast, under an Energy Department rule, carmakers can arbitrarily multiply the efficiency of electric cars by 6.67. This means that although a 2022 Tesla Model Y tests at the equivalent of about 65 miles per gallon in a laboratory (roughly the same as a hybrid), it is counted as having an absurdly high compliance value of 430 mpg. That number has no basis in reality or law. For exaggerating electric-car efficiency, the government rewards carmakers with compliance credits they can trade for cash. Economists estimate these credits could be worth billions: a vast cross-subsidy invented by bureaucrats and paid for by every person who buys a new gasoline-powered car." In the legal word an attorney isn't going to publish anything negative which cannot be corroborated by evidence else they leave themselves open to libel, among other things. So, two different playbooks one grounded in some kind of science and the other fantasy.
  • Pig_Iron Pig_Iron on Jan 22, 2024
    If he worked for Sports Illustrated instead of ConReps, his name would be Fake Jisher. 😉
  • EBFlex Will I miss the Malibu? No. Will GM miss the Malibu? Absolutely. They are going from making a vehicle that makes money moving 150k a year and converting the plant to make EVs (that nobody wants) at a loss every year and far less volume. The amount of stupid that is always present when it comes to EVs is astounding. The experiment is over GM. Move on
  • Mike Beranek In the sedan game, it's now either Camry or Accord. The rest are just background noise.
  • Theflyersfan I know their quality score hovers in the Tata range, but of all of the Land Rovers out there, this is the one I'd buy in a nanosecond, if I was in the market for an $80,000 SUV. The looks grew on me when I saw them in person, and maybe it's like the Bronco where the image it presents is of the "you're on safari banging around the bush" look. Granted, 99% of these will never go on anything tougher than a gravel parking lot, but if you wanted to beat one up, it'll take it. Until the first warning light.
  • Theflyersfan $125,000 for a special M4. Convinced this car exists solely for press fleets. Bound to be one of those cars that gets every YouTube reviewer, remaining car magazine writer, and car site frothing about it for 2-3 weeks, and then it fades into nothingness. But hopefully they make that color widespread, except on the 7-series. The 7-series doesn't deserve nice things until it looks better.
  • Master Baiter I thought we wanted high oil prices to reduce consumption, to save the planet from climate change. Make up your minds, Democrats.
Next