2023 Honda Accord Hybrid Review - The Unofficial Car Of TTAC Readers

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn

Fast Facts

2023 Honda Accord Hybrid Touring

Powertrain
2.0-liter four with hybrid electric motor (204 total system horsepower)
Transmission
Electronically-controlled CVT, front-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
46 city / 41 highway / 44 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
5.0 city / 5.7 highway / 5.3 combined. (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$38,985 US / $46,463 CAN
As Tested
$38,985 US / $46,463 CAN
Prices include $1,095 destination charge in the United States and $1,963 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Among the TTAC team, we’ve long joked that we could easily maintain our readership if we limited our daily coverage to one or two makes and models. While virtually everyone reading and commenting on our daily stories is an enthusiast of some persuasion, we can generally count on our readers to be pragmatic and practical when it comes to either buying a new car or recommending a new car to others. While exotic sports cars are fun to think about, most of you just need something to get back and forth every day without worry.


One of those pragmatic and practical cars that seems to be the darling of our loyal readership is in front of you today, the 2023 Honda Accord Hybrid. Except for that one guy in the comments frantically mashing out the name of a certain EV maker in every statement in all caps as if afflicted with some sort of digital Tourettes’, I’ve got to believe that a solid percentage of our readership would list the Accord at the top of their most-recommended vehicles. Indeed, your author has happily owned a few Accords in his lifetime, and others around the virtual office have done so as well. Let’s see if the latest lives up to expectations.



Beyond simply stating the words “Honda Accord,” I’m sure I can light up many a driver with the simple phrase “It’s Not A Crossover.” While, yes, the tall wagon form has become the de facto standard of modern-day motoring, there are a number of drivers who prefer a lower, leaner vehicle for their everyday use. The Accord Hybrid is certain to appeal to those drivers, as it has all of the ride comfort and room you’d expect. 

No, it’s not sporty. While the relatively low ride height and reasonable mass (around 3400 pounds) mean it’s a nimble touring machine, it’s hard to see a hybrid-powered Accord as a sports sedan. This is a relaxed, comfortable ride that demands nothing but the occasional fill-up. If I had to pick a car for a coast-to-coast drive, this would be it. There is room to stretch out both front and rear. The seats are basically perfect.

Yeah, the fuel economy is a big part of the appeal. You really have to try hard to send the fuel economy below 40mpg - maybe, if I were daring, I’d spend an entire week driving in reverse and see what kind of mileage I’d get? While electric vehicles may well be the way of the future, most of us aren’t there yet. An easy 500 miles between fuel stops can help drive down both costs and the expected impact on the environment today.

In this top Touring trim, you get all of the expected whistles and/or bells that Honda can throw at a vehicle. The 12.3-inch touchscreen is bright, clear, and responsive, and comes with wireless Android Auto And Apple CarPlay. The 12-speaker Bose-branded audio system sounds great. The leather seats, as noted before, were comfortable and supportive - the leather isn’t what you’d find in the highest-end luxury cars, but it feels both soft and durable.

While styling has never been the biggest highlight of any Accord, the current model you see here is a bit anonymous. It’s attractive, but perhaps a bit bland for my tastes. The fastback roofline does look a bit racy, but this will soon blend into the background and won’t turn heads. For most people looking to buy an everyday car, that’s perfectly fine.

Unfortunately, my time with the Accord Hybrid was not without incident, though it wasn’t the fault of Honda. I had a minor parking lot encounter with another driver who backed out of their parking space a bit too briskly. The rear cross-traffic alert did warn me of an approaching car and slammed on the brakes, but the other driver who hit me didn’t have such a safety aid equipped on their older crossover. The Accord sustained a bit of damage to the paint on the rear bumper, which may be slightly noticeable in the pictures. 

Again, nothing to blame Honda here for, but I feel that if we’re going to call ourselves The Truth About Cars that we have to give you The Truth About What Happened When We Were Driving Said Cars. We don’t aim to test every safety system every time we drive, but when you put as many miles on our rides as we do, things do happen. They say you meet the nicest people in a Honda, but I didn’t want to meet them this way.


Many other websites and magazines have long raved about the Accord, consistently rating the car in their Top Whatever for the year. There’s a good reason for that. The 2023 Honda Accord Hybrid remains the best family sedan you can buy, which is why TTAC’s Best and Brightest continue to recommend it. 


[Images: © 2023 Chris Tonn]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 87 comments
  • Hal Hal on Jan 13, 2024

    How can you say that the Accord hybrid has an electronically controlled CVT when to my understanding there is no gear ratio change involved?

  • Matty Matty on Feb 03, 2024

    I have a 2024 Honda Accord Hybrid. My first Honda and first Hybrid fully loaded. Wow! It drives like a dream, smooth as glass, has snazzy grill heating area inside, moon roof and it is an absolute dream to drive. I thought my Camry drove well. The dash has several options so you can see the battery and gas output at same time. Lots of info available. This out tops it by a mile! 3 complaints. 1) seatbelts do not retract well and 2) the passengers seat no matter what you request does not have a way of heightening the seat so passengers ride low and shorter people have to use a cushion to see over the dash. You cant even replace seat with one that does bec they dont make it and higher end models should at least be given an option. They havent fixed the problem with the 2025 models either! Honda really has to fix that seat especially in higher end models to match the drivers seat. Issue 3) Apple Car Play has to be streamed by phone vs being streamed by the car like w my toyota and the older 2020 Honda models did but they stopped contract w with company. One has to contact SiriusXM and give VIN # bec getting a phone ID is nearly impossible. Result is you get dropped signals and some stations dont register at first. I have latest Apple iphone 15 pro w unlimited data so its not a phone issue. The easiest way is to put your favorite stations in library on SiriusXM app vs having to scroll through everything where before one chose stations and they stayed there not having streaming to reload each time. Sometimes connection is difficult and a reset is required. I wish they’d go back to other way but cheaper for Honda and more inconvenient for their customers. Also boxes on screen showing apps or stations are real large. Thus one can only see small amount of stations or apps at a time requiring flipping from one screen to another and one cannot change size of boxes. Otherwise an absolutely wonderful car so far.

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next