Stellantis/UAW Deal Spills Tea on Future Product

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

One of the most common refrains from automaker PR departments is “we cannot comment on future product.” Fortunately, the recent agreement between Stellantis and the UAW blew the doors wide open on that particular topic – at least for the Auburn Hills company.


A document detailing a slew of finer points about the agreement has been posted to the Web, diving into deep detail about everything from finances to product plans. While it remains an excellent idea for our man Matt Posky to continue expertly parsing minutae of the former, our fancy-pants Managing Editor has permitted observation of the latter by this writer.

And, as the above screencap shows, there’s plenty to observe. News of an all-new midsize truck bound for the recently shuttered Belvidere plant has been reported in the past, though this document places an exclamation point on timing and volume – calendar year 2027 and about 100,000 units. For reference, Jeep has sold approximately 42,000 Gladiators through the first three quarters of this year (vs 60k-ish this time last year).


From there, things get infinitely more detailed – and interesting. According to this, the current Wrangler and aforementioned Gladiator will continue until 2028 with a PHEV upgrade in 2025. When it appears, the next-gen Wrangler is apparently going to include a BEV and REPB, which means full-electric and range-extender variants. If you really want to roll your eyes at marketing fluff, know that REPB stands for ‘Range Electric Paradigm Breaker’ in internal Stellantis-speak. Oof.


Both models of Wagoneer – regular and grand – will continue into 2028 with a refresh in ’25, with a REPB variant planned for that same year and a BEV two annums hence. Strangely, the brand is planning for another refresh of the Wagoneer/Grand Wagoneer in 2027. Gotta keep up with the Joneses, I guess.


On the pickup truck side of the house, we find mention that the DS-code Ram 1500 pickup truck (read: the Ram Classic which was introduced in 2009) may depart after 2024. That is the same year in which we’ll get mid-cycle action on the DT-code Ram 1500 plus BEV and REPB models. Notably, confirmation of the STLA Frame architecture is noted for the latter two trucks.


Plans for the Detroit Assembly plant include a Durango through 2024 at which time there may be a year’s hiatus whilst new ICE and BEV models are prepped using the same Durango name. Good. Two-row and three-row Grand Cherokees are good to ’27 and ’28, respectively; both will see mid-cycle action next year.


[Images: Stellantis, UAW]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Nov 06, 2023

    Ram Classic has to go. Especially with the end of the "hemi ". No need for it.

  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Nov 06, 2023

    I’m kind of surprised that the current Durango is going to be available through 2025 since it was based on the previous generation Grand Cherokee which went away last model cycle. Nonetheless they still sell a fair number of them because they are traditional SUV that’s sized a bit larger than Grand Cherokee or Explorer but smaller than a full size Tahoe or Wagoneer.

  • SCE to AUX This is the right direction for EVs, but I can't warm up to Kia's latest styling.This is bad news for Rivian, whose similarly-specced R3 isn't due until 2027 or something.Perhaps a low-spec version will start at $30k (maybe), but the 300-mile version with trimmings will certainly run closer to $50k. Then everyone will say Kia lied.
  • Buickman foolishness has no bounds, or borders.
  • JMII Wonder what the Hyundai version will look like because I am NOT a fan of this styling.Also someone needs to explain to H/K/G that you want the dark colored interior parts were you touch/sit and the lighter color parts elsewhere. For example the door panels here are dark with light armrests - this is backwards. Genesis made the same mistake in the GV60's white/ash (grey) interior. While I greatly appreciate something other then the dreaded black cave interior did they not consider how impossible this will be to keep clean in the real world?
  • JMII I see lots of ads for their CUVs but given the competition in this segment why would I buy an Outlander over a similar product from Toyota, Honda or Hyundai? Mitsubishi needs to offer something compelling, some hook or defining difference. I don't think I've encountered a single person who says "wow have you seen the new [blank] from Mitsubishi? I need to get me one of those".I owned a Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T back in '96 and it was fun car. Mitsubishi once made interesting choices with a rally heritage - those cars were fast and pretty high tech at the time. Like Nissan they kind of fell into the we will finance anyone pool so other then an Evo as a track toy anyone I knew steered clear of them.
  • ToolGuy It will be interesting to see how this does.
Next