Federal Investigators End Seven-Year Scrutiny of Shifters in Ram, Durango

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Tall hats at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have indicated they have wrapped an investigation into the gear selector design found in some Durango SUVs and Ram pickup trucks.

At issue were Ram 1500s from 2013 – 2017 and Dodge Durango models from 2014 – 2017 in which complaints were made to the NHSTA about incidents of vehicle roll-away after the operator allegedly shifted the transmission to Park and exited the rig. Specifically, the carping involved multiple vehicles which shared a common electronic rotary shifter design. Fun fact for gearhead trivia: these dials are manufactured by an outfit called Kostal Automotive in Germany.


Way back in 2016, the agency opened a file to investigate 43 of these rollaway incidents. During the course of this study, the Office of Defects Investigation (there’s a department name, if we ever heard one) says they did not find evidence a vehicle-based design or manufacturing defect was the cause of vehicle rollaway incidents on the subject vehicles. They then reference a so-called Customer Satisfaction Notification – think of it as a not-quite recall – which provided “automated vehicle securement” when an operator attempts to exit the vehicle without successfully jamming the thing into Park. The CSN took the form of a software update and the feds seemed reasonably satisfied it was effective in reducing the frequency of vehicle rollaway incidents in the subject vehicles. 


A recall would have been ruinously expensive. Murilee has noted on numerous occasions the specter of Ford getting away with sending out stickers instead of actually fixing their rollaway issues back in the bad old days, though that problem was a physical defect and not down to a potentially confusing design of an electronic shifter.

This author will opine that he despises trucks which slam themselves back into park when trying to move forward or backward with a door ajar. Sure, it’s not a technique taught in driving school but negotiating one’s way up to a trailer while solo (despite the phalanx of on-board cameras) or any number of other real world truck tasks requiring craning of necks are often easier with a door open – at least for us old guys. You’d think giving the option to manually turn such a feature off, even buried deep in an infotainment menu, would satisfy even the most pencil-necked of corporate lawyers.


Still, all this confab puts a bit of polish on the argument that consistently trying to reinvent shifter controls can create problems. It's worth noting differences in this case and the one focused on shifters used in machines like the Jeep Grand Cherokee.


[Images: Dodge]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • 2manyvettes 2manyvettes on Jan 31, 2024

    I have had three of these ('15 Ram, '19 Ram and '16 Durango) and never tried to back up with the door open, so I have not experienced that particular problem. I have, however, left the shifter in gear more than once when I turned off the ignition and the transmission automatically shifted to park. The '19 Ram has an electronic parking brake that automatically sets when I roll the shifter into park. Personally, I have no problem with these shifters.

  • Teddyc73 Teddyc73 on Feb 01, 2024

    43 out of hundreds of thousands. Wow, something must be amiss.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Of course the whole image isn't allowed, but the important point is there.
  • Buickman let's see...spend Billions remodeling stores, often unnecessarily, then move to online sales.demand further useless capital expenditures, or take a check for your sign.stair steps that squeeze smaller stores, taking losses to hit the Big Bucks.promote consolidation reducing competition and opposition.Factory Owned stores didn't work, no skin in the game. Cash for Clunkers was a fiasco. the Market is a beautiful thing when left alone.one might suppose a major industry like ours would have leaders who produced results other than lost market share, Red Ink, and dwindling at best share price.dollingerdifference.com
  • Ger65690267 They already use the GR-S badge on trucks and SUVs internationally. Such as the GR-S Hilux and Fortuner in the Philippines. Essentially a cosmetic and suspension package.
  • Lorenzo Ford's sales were $172.6 billion with a net after tax profit of $4.33 billion, AFTER losing over $5 billion on EVs. The industry average profit is 7.5% of revenue, with Ford usually about 6%.On $172.6 billion, they should have made $10.34 billion at 6%, or $12.9 billion if they made the 7.5% industry average, so they're underperforming, even if they hadn't lost $5 billion on EVs. But the fact remains that they're still making a profit.
  • Zipper69 " The governor recently approved a bill that gives her the power to remove incentives from companies that recognize unions"Political thumb on the scales...It's the MAGArat politicians in the State that fight unions and spend money to propagandize that a union is just one step from resurrecting Joseph Stalin as their next Governor.Pitiful. Still using the same phony arguments from McCarthy in the 1950's that continues to lock us out of normalizing relations with Cuba.
Next