EPA Report Reveals Dual-Motor Rivian R1S Range

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Range and power figures certified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have come out for the Rivian R1S Dual Motor and have been shared by the relevant forums. Things are looking pretty good, too. Depending on how it’s optioned, owners could be seeing 348 miles of range between charges — which is actually better than the automaker had previously speculated.


One of the biggest issues holding back all-electric vehicles has been range anxiety. With everything but at-home charging taking longer and being generally less convenient than traditional fueling, EVs are often seen as less practical when it comes to longer journeys.


While your author is of the opinion that anything below 300 miles is totally unacceptable for any primary vehicle, Rivian’s base R1S only yields 260 miles between charges. Fortunately, the company is willing to sell you a larger battery pack that brings the Quad-Motor model up to an EPA-estimated 320 miles.


Considering the base model costs roughly $78,000, there’s no such thing as an affordable R1S. But the Quad-Motor variant offering a useful amount of range is brutally expensive, requiring you to splurge on the $6,000 battery pack in addition to the $8,000 setup that installs an electric motor in every wheel hub. You’ll be spending $92,000 to get the screaming 835-horsepower monster.


Fans of the brand have been eagerly awaiting the Dual-Motor R1S with the larger battery pack, as it was assumed to offer improved range and more than enough power estimated to peak somewhere around 700 horsepower.


Based on EPA testing documents shared by the Rivian Forums, we now know that the model is supposed to boast 708 horsepower. However, that likely pertains to the Performance update brand offers for an additional $5,000. Standard units that have not been issued the relevant over-the-air updates should come in somewhere around 600 horsepower.


That means the powertrain is capable of more and has been electronically neutered by the manufacturer so it can upsell you on the Performance package. It also means that people will eventually figure out how to jailbreak the R1S to squeeze more juice from the electric motors. But Rivian will assuredly complain about this, undoubtedly preferring servile customers willing to spend more money.


The above may likewise indicate that EPA testing only pertained to the Performance version. If so, that means the standard Dual-Motor R1S would likely offer improved range when paired with a larger battery pack. However, all we have are the figures outlined in the report and they would seem to suggest numbers associated with the R1S.


Depending on how customers configure their wheels and tires, the combination of the Dual-Motor and Large Battery can yield a maximum range of 348 miles with 21-inch wheels and street tires. However, selecting larger wheels or all-terrain tires brings that number down. The worst combo seems to be the 20-inch wheels wrapped in rubber designed to be taken off-road. This tracks with what we’ve seen with other vehicles, regardless of powertrain. But it’s nice to know you can still get an off-road-focused EV capable of exceeding 300 miles between charges.


[Image: Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 16 comments
  • Haze3 Haze3 on Jun 06, 2023

    Interesting vehicle but, really, it's not hard to be great at anything if cost is not a serious constraint. This is A LOT of cost.


    Second, it's no great trick to use a large battery to get large range. If the internet is to be believed, the long-range R1S runs a 135KWh pack vs. the I6 at 77KWh. That's going to add up to a big difference in running mass and charging times.

    • See 1 previous
    • Haze3 Haze3 on Jun 07, 2023

      SCE: Sure, not the same vehicles.

      Just appears to be a tendency to talk EV range without noting the battery capacities required to get said range. To that end, a "nice" 320mi range is less as valuable if you need a huge battery to get there (i.e. long charge times, high mass, larger offset between EPA and interstate range).







  • Gemcitytm Gemcitytm on Jun 06, 2023

    Why does it seem every EV seems to have ridiculous amounts of power? Yes, I know they're heavier than ICE models but who on earth needs 708 HP? How about a nice, compact EV with, say, 250 HP and 350-400 mile range? Is that impossible with today's tech? (I currently drive a 148 HP Mazda 3 ICE and it has all the get-up-and-go I need.)

    • See 3 previous
    • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Jun 07, 2023

      I own an EV that's used almost exclusively in the city, and I don't think ranges below about 150 miles work well even for city runabout use. 150 miles is the practical minimum and the MX-30 (1) didn't get there and (2) was too expensive for what the buyer got.


  • 1995 SC The sad thing is GM tends to kill cars when they get them right, so this was probably a pretty good car
  • Mason Had this identical car as a 17 year old in the late 90's. What a ball of fun, one of many I wish I still had.
  • FinnEss At my age, sedans are difficult to get into without much neck and hip adjustment.I apologize sincerely but that is just the way it is. A truck is my ride of choice.Pronto
  • Ajla The market for sedans is weaker than it once was but I think some of you are way overstating the situation and I disagree that the sales numbers show sedans are some niche thing that full line manufacturers should ignore. There are still a sizeable amount of sales. This isn't sports car volume. So far this year the Camry and Civic are selling in the top 10, with the Corolla in 11 and the Accord, Sentra, and Model 3 in the top 20. And sedan volume is off it's nadir from a few years ago with many showing decent growth over the last two years, growth that is outpacing utilities. Cancelling all sedans now seems more of an error than back when Ford did it.
  • Duties The U.S . would have enough energy to satisfy our needs and export energy if JoeBama hadn’t singlehandedly shut down U.S. energy exploration and production. Furthermore, at current rates of consumption, the U.S. has over two centuries of crude oil, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/exclusive-current-rates-consumption-us-has-more-two-centuries-oil-report.Imagine we lived in a world where all cars were EV's. And then along comes a new invention: the Internal Combustion Engine.Think how well they would sell. A vehicle HALF the weight, HALF the price that would cause only a quarter of the damage to the road. A vehicle that could be refueled in 1/10th the time, with a range of 4 times the distance in all weather conditions. One that does not rely on the environmentally damaging use of non-renewable rare earth elements to power it, and uses far less steel and other materials. A vehicle that could carry and tow far heavier loads. And is less likely to explode in your garage in the middle of the night and burn down your house with you in it. And ran on an energy source that is readily extracted with hundreds of years known supply.Just think how excited people would be for such technology. It would sell like hot cakes, with no tax credits! Whaddaya think? I'd buy one.
Next