The Polestar 4 Gets Big Power but No Back Window

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Though it’s a bit more adventurous and sporty than its parent company, Polestar’s designs haven’t drastically strayed from Volvo’s calming look. That’s changing – albeit slightly – for 2024, with the introduction of the Polestar 4. The coupe-SUV features a concept car look, including a large solid panel where the back window should be.


Polestar offers two powertrains, including a single-motor rear-drive variant with 272 horsepower and a 373-mile range estimate on the WLTP cycle. The dual-motor version delivers 544 horsepower and a range estimate of 348 miles, and Polestar claims a 3.8-second 0-60 mph time. Bi-directional charging is standard, allowing the Polestar 4 to charge other EVs and external power equipment. 


The elephant in the room with the exterior design is that Polestar left off the rear window. Instead, the cabin features a high-definition screen that features a wide-view display of the rear of the vehicle. Polestar said the feed could be deactivated to allow the front passenger to see people in the back. 


Polestar increased its use of sustainable and recycled materials and said the new upholstery material is made from 100 percent recycled polyester. The carpets were made using recycled plastic, and other plastics incorporate more recycled material instead of introducing new plastic to the manufacturing process. The automaker said it designed the interior with more common base materials to reduce waste. 


A 15.4-inch touchscreen comes standard, running on Google’s Android Automotive OS. The update brings Google built-in services, including Maps, Assistant, and the Google Play app store. A 1,400-watt, 12-speaker Harman Kardon sound system is available, and the 4 comes standard with Apple CarPlay. 


Polestar retains Volvo’s heavy focus on vehicle safety, and the 4 gets several advanced driver aids. It comes with 12 cameras, a dozen ultrasonic sensors, and interior cameras for driver monitoring. Polestar said it does not collect the interior video, noting that it’s only used to make sure the driver is paying attention. 


[Image: Polestar]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Garrett Garrett on Apr 20, 2023

    The problem with this, or with rearview mirror LCD displays while the car is underway, is physics.


    You eye focuses differently when looking at a screen than when looking at images in a mirror. When you take your eyes off the road to look in a mirror, the focal length can stay the same - not so with a screen.


    Essentially, you force people to quickly go from distance to near and then back to distance every time they want to see what's behind them. Meanwhile, Millennials are just about to start hitting that age when they have to move their glasses to read a menu.

  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Jul 18, 2023

    Instead of showing you the outside, here is a picture of what's outside. Volvo has really lost it's way as this is in no way safe.

  • MrIcky I bet these will sell ok- as fleet vehicles. They will take on in town pick up duties for power companies when an hd with tool boxes aren't required, they will show up on any company that wants to push a 'green image' but still needs to haul ladders and such like solar and roofing. It will be a strange truck in a strange market but I bet it doesn't do too bad
  • 2ACL If your driving and/or maintenance regimen wrecked the valves, what other horrors await me? A maintained 2.slow can be decent basic transportation, though many of the models carrying it are old enough to have age-related problems. This is impending heartbreak for anyone not intent on getting their hands dirty.
  • Theflyersfan If cutting costs (which usually means cheaper parts and materials) is their plan of attack, all the while dealing with millions of cars recalled and with serious quality issues, I think staying away from Ford is the best thing possible. When you hack and slash away like that, it tends to be a race to the bottom. (See: Nissan and Mitsubishi. )How about, instead, focusing on what is breaking and forcing expensive recalls and emergency service bulletins because it always costs more to fix it after the fact. And then the reputation can be improved and you can charge $100,000 for a pickup without a guilty conscience.
  • EBFlex Translation: “We want to lower quality even more”How about stop with the EVs that nobody wants and is a dead end road and invest that into making quality vehicles?
  • Jeff Agree but manufacturers in the US have discontinued manuals on most vehicles and eventually discontinue all manuals. The problem is that most vehicles made today have computers controlling most functions in vehicles. HVAC, power steering, power brakes, parking brakes, transmissions, and many other functions that were manual and now electronic. The mechanical functions were easier to repair and more reliable. The Maverick has a lot less technology than many of the newer vehicles at least you can control lights, temperature, and radio without going through a screen but compared to past vehicles I have owned it has more technology than I want or need.I am not looking forward to these recalls as a Maverick owner but I will get them taken care of. I do not like the trend toward mechanical functions that have worked well for decades being controlled through a computer function or CANBUS. It is cheaper for the automakers to buy preassembled components reducing time on the assembly line but it makes it more expensive to work on and the parts are usually more expensive. Hoovie and the Car Wizard have some good videos on the difficulty of working on most modern day vehicles and the increasing expense of replacement parts.
Next