Report: Ford Vows Better Dealer Engagement, NADA Attendees Vexed

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Last week, Ford CEO Jim Farley asked a group of dealers for some open and honest feedback while promising to spend the next few weeks visiting showrooms. The point was to create a conversation between the automaker and dealerships that have grown annoyed with some of the changes Ford has been asking them to make. However, the latest from the North American Dealers Association (NADA) meeting makes it sound like the relationship may still be dicey.


According to Automotive News, Blue Oval has been promising better communication with all businesses tied to sales — with chief dealer engagement officer Elena Ford having stated that things need to change on Friday.


But dealers attending the NADA show in Las Vegas on Saturday expressed their dismay that Ford snubbed a Q&A segment presumed to take place during a larger follow-up meeting.


From Automotive News:


The next day, however, some dealers who attended Ford's larger make meeting left disgruntled after executives offered few specifics on hot-button issues such as electric vehicles or quality improvements. The officials also failed to take questions from the dealers, in a break from the company's standard practice.
Farley was not at the second meeting, which involved broad discussions about 2023 highlights and 2024 goals, according to multiple people in the room. At a time when dealer trust levels in Ford have plummeted, some retailers had hoped to ask about the EV certification program and recall concerns but were surprised to not get an opportunity. Executives did offer to stay and talk with dealers informally after the meeting let out, one attendee said.
"It's very disappointing when you have a town hall setting and you don't get to have your voice heard," said the dealer, who asked to not be identified discussing a closed-door meeting.


This isn’t exclusively a Ford problem, however. There is a growing sense that the automotive industry is keen to scale back dealerships in general to engage in more direct sales in a manner mimicking how Tesla does its business. While state laws have long prohibited automakers from directly selling their vehicles to consumers, the industry seems to be taking steps to do exactly that and now has a company to cite as precedence. Many showrooms have already grown antsy about the prospect of having to spend six-figure sums to prepare for all-electric vehicles they’re not even certain they want, so the added pressure of dealer consolidation (or outright elimination) is creating additional pressure.


Of course, few people are going to bother to feel sympathy after years of reports outlining severe dealer markups. Some of that was down to old-fashioned greed. But the industry also went through years of production shortfalls that spiked demand and intentionally eliminated their most-affordable models to game increasingly stringent government regulations. It could certainly be argued that automakers and even federal regulators are likewise responsible for the staggering price increases you’ve encountered at the dealership.


These were things NADA attendees with ties to the Ford Motor Company had hoped to clear up going into the event.


"We're going to have a dealer panel at the make meeting, and there's going to be more Q&A from the dealer body," David Wilson, chairman of the Ford National Dealer Council, told Automotive News going into the event. "We're going to have more of a two-way conversation."


Ford has refused to make any executives available for comment following the meeting and Wilson declined to comment on the matter. However, at least some of the meeting was devoted to addressing some of the aforementioned concerns. Attendees just believed them to be too generalized without offering concrete solutions. The best they got was the automaker promising to rework its EV certification program for dealers as time went on.


Rather than supposing which side of the situation is in the right here, it’s likely more useful to take away that rifts have been forming between dealers and manufacturers. If either side is keen to maintain the relationship, they’re going to have to work together better than they have been thus far.


[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Rover Sig 2021 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited, like my previous JGC's cheap to keep (essentially just oil, tires) until recent episode of clunking in front suspension at 50K miles led to $3000 of parts replaced over fives visits to two Jeep dealers which finally bought a quiet front end. Most expensive repair on any vehicle I've owned in the last 56 years.
  • Bob Hey Tassos, have you seen it with top down. It's a permanent roll bar so if it flips no problem. It's the only car with one permanently there. So shoots down your issue. I had a 1998 for 10 years it was perfect, but yes slow. Hardly ever see any of them anymore.
  • 3-On-The-Tree 2007 Toyota Sienna bedsides new plugs, flat tire on I-10 in van Horn Tx on the way to Fort Huachuca.2021 Tundra Crewmax no issues2021 Rav 4 no issues2010 Corolla I put in a alternator in Mar1985 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ60 280,000mi I put in a new radiator back in 08 before I deployed, did a valve job, new fuel and oil pump. Leaky rear main seal, transmission, transfer case. Rebuild carb twice, had a recall on the gas tank surprisingly in 2010 at 25 years later.2014 Ford F159 Ecoboost 3.5L by 80,000mi went through both turbos, driver side leaking, passenger side completely replaced. Rear min seal leak once at 50,000 second at 80,000. And last was a timing chain cover leak.2009 C6 Corvette LS3 Base, I put in a new radiator in 2021.
  • ChristianWimmer 2018 Mercedes A250 AMG Line (W177) - no issues or unscheduled dealer visits. Regular maintenance at the dealer once a year costs between 400,- Euros (standard service) to 1200,- Euros (major service, new spark plugs, brake pads + TÜV). Had one recall where they had to fix an A/C hose which might become loose. Great car and fun to drive and very economical but also fast. Recently gave it an “Italian tune up” on the Autobahn.
  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
Next