Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Signs Bill Blocking Most Direct-to-Consumer Auto Sales

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Dealer franchise laws are controversial at best and downright divisive in most cases, but they remain a significant force in the automotive industry despite the political noise surrounding them. Florida governor and GOP presidential candidate Ron DeSantis recently joined the fray when he signed House Bill 637, legislation that blocks direct auto sales for most brands but not all. 


As Inside EVs pointed out, the bill’s language prohibits direct-to-consumer sales by automakers. However, those that don’t already have existing franchise agreements can, so brands like Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, and others. While that won’t be a significant change from the current automotive retail situation, the law could give those automakers a competitive advantage over legacy companies, as it lets them sell vehicles at lower prices without covering dealers’ overhead.


Calls to revise or nix dealer franchise laws have become louder recently, as car buyers have felt the wrath of inflation, supply chain shortages, and extreme demand for some models. Those conditions have given dealers an open door to raise prices on new and used vehicles, which has led some to question why automakers can’t bypass dealers and sell directly to consumers.


Dealer franchise laws prevent that in most cases. They are designed to protect buyers, and the National Auto Dealers Association (NADA) notes that they can also benefit manufacturers. While those claims are open to debate, the net effect on the average car buyer is that the choice is to buy from an established auto brand at a dealership or buy from an upstart EV company at a direct store.


There’s certainly a case to be made that local dealers play an important role in service and product support. Still, the remote service and mostly digital support programs offered by companies like Rivian have earned relatively solid reviews, and the brands’ customers are among the happiest respondents in surveys. 


[Image: Hunter Crenian via Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Any carmaker that wants to sell direct-to-customer just has to create a new brand that only sells direct-to-customer.

    There are so many idiots in politics, probably because any sane person would know better than to enter politics. In Florida it's worse - any sane person would stay the hell away from that state.

  • Paul Paul on Nov 27, 2023

    Consumer's opinion in the matter counts for NADA.

  • Redapple2  the total time for someone charging in this manner would be 11.5 hours from empty to full................ I get home from work at 6pm. leave at 7 am. So..............
  • Rover Sig The range of salaries (and of wealth in general) is now quite extended. There are people who live on $30K a year and drive a 30 year old Ford Ranger (the most loyally loved truck in America). There are couples who each make $250K a year, $500K total, and $90K luxo SUV is nothing to them. I see this range of vehicles every day in Northern Virginia/Maryland. The vehicle makers want to sell to just the high end folks, but they are only 10-20% of the population and can't sustain the industry. The companies need to sell a bit of something to everyone on the spectrum of wealth.
  • Tassos Even if you ARE interested in a BEV, this is ABSOLUTELY LAUGHABLE. NO EXCUSES.The RANGE is DISMAL, and yet they ask... $38k for it? Are you OUT OF YOUR STUPID MIND, NISSAN? I would not pay HALF that for such an underperformer!
  • Akear I told a friend why did you pay $100,000 for an excreable GM truck. He had no logical answer.
  • Bd2 According to May sales data, sales of vehicles under $40k and over $60k increased market share.
Next