2024 Nissan Titan Priced at $45,770

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Nissan has rolled out pricing for the 2024 Titan pickup truck. It starts several thousand shillings higher than last year because the base S trim has been axed, though an equivalent 2023 SV 4x2 has a sticker of $45,650.


In other words, ignore other sites with headlines screaming about Nissan jacking the Titan’s asking price by five grand. True, one used to be able to get a stripper Titan King Cab S 4x2 for $40,350 but that trim was hardly the most popular kid on the block. In reality, price changes on volume models like the SV hardly register on the Richter scale.


Other changes to the truck are light, including the option of a Bronze Package on SV trims which brings (you guessed it) bronze-hued 20-inch wheels and a few other styling tweaks. Every Titan now gets the 5.6-liter V8 engine, going to work with 400 horsepower and 413 lb-ft of torque.


This author tested the then-newly revised Titan for the 2020 model year and was on the cusp of palming the keys to one before being seduced by a hilariously cheap two-year lease deal (remember those?) on a Sierra which was more lavishly equipped. It’s not that Titan is an objectively bad truck but the cutthroat half-ton market demands some sort – any sort – of unique selling proposition. Whether that’s an in-bed electric generator, trick tailgate, or towering off-road cred is an approach parlayed by every one of the Detroit Three (plus Toyota). It doesn’t seem its tweener XD model – the almost-but-not-quite three-quarter ton – has been enough to move the needle, either. For perspective, Ford moved 382,893 F-Series pickups through the first half of this year while Nissan shifted 10,550 Titan trucks.


Absent a solid USP, the Titan may be out of luck in the next couple of years. The truck has already been yanked from the Canadian market, miffing some dealers on the East Coast that spent scads of money on pickup-focused sales and service efforts only to have the rug pulled from under them. On the flip side, no one expects the Frontier to vanish any time soon, a solid machine that plays to its strengths including tugging on the nostalgic heartstrings of customers who fondly remember the Hardbody. Rumors swirl over the impending introduction of an EV truck, but that’s all they are – rumors.


[Image: Nissan]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Daniel J This thing is just too big and not packaged great being RWD. I'd prefer a FWD/AWD pre 2024 Santa Fe sized vehicle. A true CX-70.
  • Ash78 Now that we're on the topic, I think Apple owes us all a ton of money for bringing out new phones every 1-2 years and devaluing the one I have! /sDepreciation has always been a part of car ownership, far more so now if you're getting into EVs. I think it's just the discrete nature of these depreciation events (ie, price cuts) that have everyone wringing their hands.I'm too price sensitive -- not necessarily to BUY an EV -- but for the fear of what a truly disruptive battery tech might do to them. Split the differene with a hybrid or PHEV and you've reduced your car's reliance on battery tech as the primary determinant of value.
  • Ash78 Interesting take on the pricing...superficially illogical, but Honda has been able to sell the Pilot Junior (er, Passport) for more than the Pilot for several years now. I guess this is the new norm. I have 2 kids, who often have friends, and I feel like the best option here is buying the CX-90 and removing the third row completely. It won't be pretty, but it adds useful space. We've done that in our minivan several times.I've been anxiously awaiting the 70 for over a year, but the pricing makes it a non-starter for me. I like the 50, but it's tight (small, not dope/fire/legit); I like the 90s, but it's more than we need. This "Goldilocks Solution" feels like it's missing the mark a little. Mazda could have gone with more of a CX-60 (ROW model) and just refreshed it for the US, but I suspect the 90 was selling so well, the more economical choice was just to make it the same basic car. Seems lazy to me.
  • FreedMike If you haven't tried out the CX-90, do so - it's a great driver, particularly with the PHEV powertrain.
  • Ajla I don't understand why it is priced above the CX-90 (about $2500 at every trim level on the I6 and $5k on the PHEV), unless a CX-90 price increase is on the way soon. It will be interesting to see how this does against the CX-90, that one isn't packaged well for a 3-row but with a lower price, very similar exterior styling and identical exterior dimensions I'd lean towards it over the 70. The pricing on higher trims is a bit dear for a nonpremium badge and it is annoying that Mazda and the press pretend that the lower nonS trims don't even exist. Why even bother making them if you won't take it to your own media event?I would expect the engine and chassis configuration to be a killer app here but it seems like engine/transmission is only 80% baked and the interior is what sells these. Reliability is a big question mark as well. In the end outside of a specific buyer (this seems like something Corey would like), I'd recommend getting something cheaper and more established.
Next