More EV Price Cuts in 2024, This Time From Nissan

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

A thesis will surely be written in the future about the yo-yo behavior of EV prices which are seeming to coincide with early adopters getting their fill while everyone else needs to be talked into the things. The latest? A round of cuts at Nissan on the tongue-twisting Ariya.

For the upcoming model year, the Ariya will bear an MSRP of $39,590 for an Engage trim equipped with front-wheel drive. Sadly, the brand did not extend this naming scheme to include obvious choices like Energize or Fire Phasers or Shaka When The Wall Fell. That sum is roughly $3,600 south of last year’s equivalent trim which is still on the Nissan build-and-price site at $43,190. 


Keep in mind the Engage has a 63-kWh battery in stead of the 87-kWh unit found elsewhere in the Ariya food chain. As such, Nissan estimates the Engage FWD at 216 miles of range while the AWD shaves that to 205 miles. The latter was $47,190 last year but is reduced to $43,590 for customers considering a 2024 model.


Anyone seeking their Ariya with the larger battery pack is looking at anywhere between $41,190 and $47,690 for a Venture+ or Empower+ trim if they feel front-wheel drive will serve them well in their expected driving conditions. That’s a good $6,000 cheaper than the same trims in 2023, representing a decent amount of cheddar shorn from a monthly payment. Range estimates are 304 and 289 miles, respectively.


Should one feel all-wheel drive is necessary, look for Engage AWD to cost $43,590 (four grand less than last year) with top-dog Platinum+ AWD trims commanding $54,190 which again represents a $6,000 price cut compared to the 2023 model year. Note that none of these prices include $1,390 in destination and delivery fees.


Depending on trim and powertrain configuration, output ratings run the gamut from 214 to 389 horsepower. Look for the 2024s to appear on dealer lots very soon.


[Image: Nissan]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 15 comments
  • W Conrad Sedans have been fine for me, but I were getting a new car, it would be an SUV. Not only because less sedans available, but I can't see around them in my sedan!
  • Slavuta More hatchbacks
  • ED I don't know what GM is thinking.I have a 2020 one nice vehicle.Got rid of Camaro and was going to buy one.Probably won't buy another GM product.Get rid of all the head honchos at GM.This company is a bunch of cheapskates building junk that no one wants.
  • Lostjr Sedans have been made less practical, with low rooflines and steeply raked A pillars. It makes them harder to get in and out of. Probably harder to put a kid in a child seat. Sedans used to be more family oriented.
  • Bob Funny how Oldsmobile was offering a GPS system to help if you were lost, yet GM as a company was very lost. Not really sure that they are not still lost. They make hideous looking trucks, Cadillac is a crappy Chevy pretending to be fancy. To be honest, I would never step in a GM show room now or ever. Boring, cheap ugly and bad resale why bother. I get enough of GM when i rent on trips from airports. I have to say, does anybody at GM ever drive what everyone else drives? Do they ever then look at what crap they put out in style fit and finish? Come on, for real, do they? Cadillac updated slogan should be " sub standard of the 3rd world", or " almost as good as Tata motors". Enough said.
Next