Toyota's EV Battery Production Efforts are Looking Up

by Chris Teague

Published: March 5th, 2024

toyota s ev battery production efforts are looking up

Toyota may be pushing hard toward more diverse propulsion options instead of solely focusing on EVs, but that doesn’t mean it’s not looking for ways to make headway on electrification. The Japanese auto giant recently announced its acquisition of Primearth EV Energy from Panasonic, which it said would give it a significant boost toward EV battery mass production.

The company already owned 60 percent of Primearth, starting with a 40 percent stake when it was founded in 1996, climbing to 60 percent in 2005. In 2010, Toyota grabbed another 20.5 percent, so this recent announcement only really covers 19.5 percent of Primearth. Some of the automaker’s other partially-owned companies already produce hybrid batteries, and some build PHEV and EV batteries.

Toyota has announced a next-generation battery that it said can deliver up to 500 miles of range. It’s expected to roll the first market-ready units in 2026, and it noted that they would support super-fast charging, with times as low as 20 minutes. That could coincide with a next-gen bZ4X or the expected bZ small crossover’s release.

By 2028, Toyota expects to offer EV batteries with more than 621 miles of range and the same 20-minute charging time. They are also expected to cost 10 percent less than the batteries released in 2026.

Toyota has long promised upgraded batteries, but the automaker has so far not hit its targets, pushing solid-state batteries out as far as 2030. In the meantime, its cautious approach to EVs looks to be paying off, as other automakers have grappled with wavering demand and high costs.

[Image: Toyota]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#toyotaevs #ToyotaBZ4X #Panasonic

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 17 comments

Scott on Mar 06, 2024

Toyota is likely to go full Hybrid long before full EV (if ever) and that requires a lot of batteries so they need the capacity. The promised 500 mile range isn't the biggie, it's the 20 minute recharge time. That might mean you could add enough charge for 200-300 miles in 10 minutes which would end one of the real world problems.

Like Reply
SCE to AUX on Mar 06, 2024

Batteries don't provide range - cars do.

That mythical 621-mile range is 1000 km WLTP, which is more like 520 miles EPA... but what size car do you get for that, and I'll guarantee it's not real-world.

Toyota isn't sincere about EVs, nor tightening lug nuts.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Billyboy The Big Three, or what used to be the Big Three, have been building sedans in the FWD unibody mold since the 80’s to compete with the Japanese - and failing. The Taurus was the only decent attempt, and even that fizzled out after a few years. Back to GM, There’s no reason to choose a Malibu over a Camry or Accord for normal buyers. The story was the same when it was the Citation, Celebrity, Lumina, and Impala, as it was the same with Ford and Chrysler. GM knows this, as does Ford, and doesn’t care - and rightfully so. Better to cede this time-worn commodity segment to others and focus to where the market has shifted.
CanadaCraig You are not wrong. Or a dummy for that matter. I also think it's foolish of GM to kill off the Malibu. That said... I think there needs to be full-sized plain jane sedans for sale. And there are none. And haven't been for a long time. A basic BIG car. With room for six. Bench seat and all. Nothing fancy. And a low price to go along with it. I would buy one.
OCcarguy Back in the 1980s the Mitsubishi Cordia was one of my favorite cars. I would love to see them make cars we could get excited about again.
Chris I dislike SUVs. I think they are clunky looking and not much in the handling department. I'll take an Audi A4 or BMw three series or even a VW Jetta over any SUV. It I need more interior room for a shot time, I'll rent something bigger.
Amwhalbi I have a sedan and an SUV, and for pure driving and riding enjoyment, I'll pick my sedan every time. But yes, SUV's are generally more practical for all around usage, particularly if you have only one vehicle. So I think the perfect answer is the sedan hatchback (a la the last Buick Regal) which can still yield the drive and ride or a sedan, yet provide a greater modicum of practical, accessible cargo capacity. Most of the sedans made could (with minor styling changes) easily become 4 door hatchbacks. Oh, yeah, I forgot - Americans don't like hatchbacks, even if they do in Europe...