Junkyard Find: 1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The branches of the Chrysler K-Car Family Tree are far too numerous to describe here, since so many different K-derived cars and minivans were built from the 1981 through 1995 model years for the North American market. One of the rarest types is the 1985-1989 Dodge Lancer, and I've found an example in a Silicon Valley self-service wrecking yard.

The Lancer was the Dodge-badged version of the Chrysler LeBaron GTS hatchback sedan, priced between the Aries and 600 sedans.

The Lancer name has plenty of Chrysler history. For 1961 and 1962, the Lancer name was used on Dodge-badged twins of the Plymouth Valiant (because the Dart name was being used on big Plymouth Fury siblings at the time).

Mitsubishi began using the Lancer name in 1973, and Lancers with Dodge Colt badges appeared in the United States for the 1977 model year. Prior to that, the Colt had been Galant-based. For the 2002 model year, Mitsubishi Lancers finally arrived on this side of the Pacific.

Though Mitsubishi engines were available in plenty of K-Cars and their relatives, all of the 1985-1989 Dodge Lancers came with Chrysler 2.2- or 2.5-liter straight-four power.

This car is a top-trim-level ES with the optional 2.2-liter turbocharged engine, rated at 146 horsepower and 170 pound-feet.

A lot of 1980s cars had phony hood vents, but this one really does deliver cold air to the engine.

You see?

A five-speed manual was base equipment, but this car has the optional three-speed automatic (of course).

The final odometer reading is impressive, getting close to the 300,000-mile mark.

The MSRP for this fine Sterling Heights machine?

The base price was $10,322, which is about $29,015 in 2023 dollars. The turbocharged engine cost $628 ($1,764 today) while the automatic transmission added $504 ($1,415 now).

The Lancers just can't be kept in the showroom, so strong is their sense of 1980s rebellion.

It is the performance sedan that will thrill you all the way to the redline, hold you to the dotted line, cover you down the line, and impress you with its bottom line.

8.6 percent financing or $500 cash back!

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

1986 Dodge Lancer ES Turbo in California junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts MaintenanceCosts on Nov 07, 2023

    Surprised that the K-car that made it this long was a turbo. The most reliable engine in these was also the least powerful - the NA 2.2. (But the turbo 2.2 was still better than the Mitsu 2.6, an awful engine in every way.)

  • Carlos Munoz Carlos Munoz on Apr 10, 2024

    I'm lookinfor an 1985 Chrisler Lebaron or Lancer For Buy if some one have one For sale here is My mail carl6979@hotmail.com My phone Number : 442 270 6804 i'm from California.

  • Ted VoGhost, I am looking for 350-400 mile range with 5 minute full recharging that is available like today’s gas stations. My personal threshold has more to do with recharge availability and times than the 350 mile range. I’d be ready to switch at a dependable 250 mile range and 10 minute charge times.
  • V8fairy I am starting to see some red emerging on the roads lately. We also have a lot of used import Toyota Aquas and some of them are in really cool colours, like orange, electric blue and bright yellow. What I really miss is colourful interiors, I'd love a bordello red crushed velvet interior, that'd sell me on an EV
  • Ted Bryant Agree with Mikey.Manual. Any manual transmission car. 1) can't text-and-drive, 2) forces driver to pay attention, 3) perfect security because most thieves can't drive stick, 4) fun to drive, 5) friends won't drive the car (they can't drive stick), 6) compression start -- never get stuck, and 7) will always be able to drive any vehicle anywhere. Did this for both kids -- after a couple weeks of complaining, they finally got to it, and now only drive manual. And they are both great drivers. But their friends do poke them for driving stick -- "oh neat - a manual. do you bake your own bread and sew your own clothes too..."
  • Mikey My youngest girl ( now 48 ) dated a guy that had a Beretta with a stick shift. The Dude liked Beer and weed. too much for my liking..I borrowed my buddy's stick shift Chevette and give her short course on driving a manual .. I told her if the new BF has more than 2 beer or any weed ..You drive ...I don't care how many times you stall it, or or of you smoke the clutch . She caught on quite well ,and owned a succession of stick shift vehicles...An as an added bonus she dumped the guy.
  • Blueice "Due to regulation/govt backing, China is poised to dominate BEV/battery production, just as they do solar panel production, drone production, etc.Taiwan dominates production of certain types of chips due to regulation/govt backing and we saw how precarious such a situation is (especially with the PRC increasingly becoming aggressive towards Taiwan).That's why regulation/govt backing is aiming to build up local chip manufacturing."BD2, these businesses and or industries are not free market enterprises, buttcorporatist, bent on destroying their competitors with the use of governmentalunits to create monopolies. How safe are world consumers when the preponderance of computer chipsare made in one jurisdiction. Do you what Red China controlling any industry ??And it is well known, concentrated markets control leads to higher prices to end users.
Next