Union Bargaining Begins in Detroit

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The United Auto Workers (UAW) is commencing contract negotiations with General Motors, Stellantis, and the Ford Motor Company this week. Members of the union’s executive board, along with UAW President Shawn Fain, appeared outside Stellantis' Sterling Heights Assembly Plant early Wednesday morning to draw attention to the talks.

The plan is to see each manufacturer as a preamble to the formal negotiations, which technically begin on Friday. But the union is also desperate to show itself in a better light after expansive corruption scandals implicated some of its now-ousted top brass. For most people living in North America, wages haven’t kept pace with the cost of living and inflationary pressures are exacerbating the issue. If there was ever a time to get the American public back on the side of unions, it’s now.


Wednesday’s press event was a little unusual for the UAW. Normally, contract negotiations are launched with little fanfare. But Fain and friends have said they want to do things differently since assuming control. They don’t even plan on choosing a singular manufacturer on which to focus, despite this being the norm for years. Instead, the union plans on dealing with all three companies simultaneously.


"The strike target is the Big 3," Fain said on Wednesday. "If the Big 3's not going to come to the pump for workers, there's going to be issues."


He’s been promising to stay in close contact with union members and appears willing to play hardball if manufacturers aren’t willing to compromise. While the union has shown itself as willing to strike in recent years, high-profile bribery scandals have undermined its credibility as an organization.


Though it’s not as though the UAW hasn’t enjoyed any wins. The union has managed to negotiate wage increases and limits to the number of temporary employees an automaker can employ. But concessions have also been made in recent years and it could be argued that the overall trajectory for factory workers has been pretty bleak since the early 2000s — if not earlier. 


"Since the Great Recession, we haven't gained, really, anything," Fain explained to the media. "And the companies have made a quarter of a trillion dollars in profits in the last decade."


Automotive News reported that the union head appeared on Facebook Live Tuesday evening to request members fill out support cards. The cards include contact information so the union can keep workers informed on bargaining updates and how they can help. Fain has said he wanted to keep members better appraised than his predecessors had and seems more willing to leverage them into pushing back against the industry.


"We've got to stop this can't-do mentality," he said. "The question I need you to think about is, 'How far are you willing to go to win the contract you deserve?'”


Getting more could be a tall order, however. Offshoring jobs has proven lucrative for domestic manufacturers. Automotive News even released a report suggesting that Ford boasting more U.S. workers than GM or Stellantis places it at a $1 billion annual cost disadvantage.


From AN:


Ford employs roughly 57,000 union workers in the U.S., about 11,000 more than GM and 16,500 more than Stellantis. It has created or retained 14,000 UAW jobs — 5,600 more than it had committed to — since signing its current contract with the union in 2019.
The automaker also has invested $1.4 billion more than what's outlined in the current four-year pact and converted roughly 14,100 temporary workers to permanent status since 2019.
The contract calls for temporary workers to represent no more than 8 percent of Ford's hourly work force; they are currently only 3 percent. Ford is believed to have a significantly lower percentage of temporary workers than GM or Stellantis.
Ford enters its negotiations with the UAW, which formally begin Friday, looking to build on those job and investment commitments. But it's also seeking ways to manage costs and maintain flexibility in its manufacturing footprint as it transitions to electric vehicles.
Compared to foreign automakers that have nonunion workers, Ford has a roughly $9-an-hour labor cost gap. All in, the company said it spends an average of $112,000 on wages and benefits per hourly worker.


Meanwhile, the UAW is expected to push for wage increases and additional benefits for its members. Despite Ford’s bottom line not being quite as robust of late, Shawn Fain has argued that all three Detroit automakers have enjoyed record profits in recent years and should be able to meet the union’s demands while still turning a profit.


He has likewise expressed his intention to reinstate cost-of-living adjustments that were dropped during the 2008 recession and to end a tiered wage system that takes workers years to reach top pay of about $32 an hour.


[Image: UAW]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • JamesGarfield JamesGarfield on Jul 25, 2023

    There's a guy here in TX named Randy Adams. He has a car dealership here, and puts on a somewhat interesting radio show on local talk radio.


    Last night, this guy said he strongly expects there's gonna be a huge autoworkers strike in September, which will choke new car inventory even worse than the pandemic did.


    Anybody heard any evidence to support this?

  • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Aug 11, 2023

    Fain: Where's you're f***ng money?

  • Eliyahu Toyota has looked at the state of the world and decided that hybrids are the best fit for currently achieving environmental and regulatory goals. Their hybrid production is now across many of their models. Honda is following suit. They will both likely also produce some electric vehicles. The best path forward is likely higher fuel taxes, with some tax credit offsets for the lower tax brackets. This would encourage a move toward more fuel efficient vehicles. The US big 3 auto makers are the ones with the most to lose here-they are the late adapters-coasting on trucks.
  • 28-Cars-Later Used Teslas are getting very cheap, but buying one can be risky - Ars Technica Teslas are very connected cars, and many of their convenience features are accessed via smartphone apps. But that requires that Tesla's database shows you as the car's owner, and there are plenty of reports online that transferring ownership from Hertz can take time.Unfortunately, this also leaves the car stuck in Chill driving mode (which restricts power, acceleration, and top speed) and places some car settings outside of the new owner's level of access. You also won't be able to use Tesla Superchargers while the car still shows up as belonging to Hertz. Based on forum reports, contacting Tesla directly is the way to resolve this, but it can take several days to process; longer if there's a paperwork mismatch.Once you've transferred ownership to Tesla's satisfaction, it's time to do a software reset on the car to remove the fleet version.So apparently the state maintains title but so does Tesla in a way, and they cripple some features until they feel satisfied in unlocking them to you. How long till they brick it by satellite because, reasons? But yes, rah! rah! BEV! - its not a tool of tyranny at all, honest. Edit: Comment from the Ars forum: Happy MediumArs Tribunus Militum 19y When I got to the section that stated that THE CAR WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY CRIPPLED unless you get Tesla's acceptance of you buying the car, I got incredibly infuriated. How in the hell is this going to work going forwards? Is Tesla literally going to be approving every single resale of its cars from now until the car is totaled? Jeezus, connected is one thing, but having final ownership authority in the hands of the manufacturer and not the seller/purchaser seems horrible. 28's thoughts to Happy Medium.
  • Tane94 Subie has a cult-like devotion to its products, so it can do no wrong by being a late adopter in offering EVs. Mazda has rebranded itself from zoom zoom to affordable near luxury, with success. Toyota is most vulnerable to losing sales from not having EVs. The hybrid early adopters who made Prius their high-visibility flag bearer now have to look to another brand for a distinctive EV to righteously show themselves off.
  • Jrhurren The EV haters would keep complaining until prices hit $0, at which point they would proceed to complain some more.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Remember the Mitsubishi Pajero? 😆
Next