Junkyard Find: 1959 Renault Dauphine

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

French cars have been junkyard rarities in North America for decades now, which is an ongoing disappointment for those of us who enjoy poring over machinery that ranges from fascinating to baffling in our local Ewe Pullets. I discovered a Mexican-market '06 Peugeot 407 in a Denver boneyard, earlier this year, and thought years would pass before the next time I'd hear the ghosts of André Citroën, Louis Renault, and Armand Peugeot singing La Marseillaise over a car graveyard.

Then I learned that three Renault Dauphines had hit the regular inventory at the Pick-n-Pull in San Jose, California. I hopped a 737 out there soon after.

French cars were semi-mainstream vehicles in the United States for a good chunk of the 20th century, but their manufacturers began dropping out of our market during the last few decades.

Chrysler sold Simca 1100s (badged as 1118s and 1204s) in the USA through 1971. Citroën held out here until 1974. The final Renaults sold here were 1988 Medallions (though Renault HQ claims that we'll be able to purchase electric Alpine A110s here in 2027). Peugeot stuck it out until 1991, when the last new 405s hit American streets.

Of all those companies, Renault was the only one to score big-time North American sales success.

Taking over the American Motors Corporation in 1979 allowed Renault to sell Kenosha-built Alliances and Encores here (and to create the XJ Jeep Cherokee and very influential Eagle Premier), but the Dauphine climbed higher in the car-sales charts than any other Renault model to reach our shores.

Volkswagen was riding high in 1956, with more than 50,000 Beetles sold in the USA that year.

But then another rear-engined European import showed up, with a price tag similar to the Beetle's and two additional doors.

Not only that, the Dauphine's engine boasted water cooling, which added complexity compared to the 1930s-technology Beetle but made it possible to have a heater that worked (the Beetle's nearly-useless heater involved a heat exchanger on the exhaust, with associated danger of carbon monoxide in the passenger compartment).

In 1959, a new Renault Dauphine cost $1,645 (about $17,416 in 2023 dollars). Meanwhile, a new 1959 Beetle listed at $1,545 ($16,357 after inflation).

If you insisted on buying a new American-built car in 1959, AMC could get you into a Rambler business coupe for $1,821 ($19,279 now). If you wanted a new four-door car with a real heater that year, though, the Dauphine was by far your cheapest option.

My grandfather was doing a lot of ice racing in Minnesota when the Dauphine appeared in showrooms, so he bought one right away. It wasn't as quick on the ice as his Porsche 356-engined Beetle, but he held onto it until it rusted to nothingness (i.e., about five years later).

Renault sold plenty of Dauphines in the United States during the 1957-1960 period. During that time, it was the second-best-selling imported car in the nation, behind only the Beetle.

American Dauphine sales continued through 1966, but Renault never regained the sales glory it enjoyed here during the late 1950s.

There were multiple factors behind the decline of Dauphine sales at the dawn of the 1960s. One was the end of the Eisenhower Recession, which had forced car buyers to tighten their belts.

Another was the debut of the Ford Falcon as a 1960 model. The cheapest '60 Falcon four-door cost just $1,974 ($19,092 in 2023 dollars), and it was a genuine Detroit machine with a six-cylinder engine.

The Chevrolet Corvair also hit the scene as a 1960 model, and the four-door started at a mere $2,038 ($21,356 now). Plymouth's cheapest 1960 Valiant four-door had a $2,033 price tag.

To make matters worse for Renault and Volkswagen, BMC undercut both the Dauphine and the Beetle on price with the Austin Mini, which made its US-market debut as a 1960 model. It had only two doors, but cost just $1,295 ($13,570 today).

One advantage the Beetle had over its French rival was its standard four-speed manual transmission. The Dauphine had a three-on-the-floor manual until fairly deep into the 1960s.

The 1959 Beetle and its 36-horse, 1192cc boxer-four engine held the power edge over the Dauphine, which got 30 horsepower out of its 845cc straight-four. The Dauphine was lighter, but the Beetle still had the power-to-weight advantage.

For 1960, Renault began offering the Dauphine Gordini, which had an impressive 40 horsepower. One of the three Dauphines now residing at the San Jose Pick-n-Pull is a Gordini, and I'll write about it soon enough.

The blue 1960 Dauphine next to today's Junkyard Find will appear as a Junkyard Gem at Autoblog in the very near future. The Gordini is parked a couple of rows away, next to a Saab 95.

All three of those Dauphines were for sale on the SF Bay Craigslist site for months, with a price tag of $1,000 for the trio.

They had rusty bodies and sun-nuked interiors after sitting outdoors in Northern California for who-knows-how-many decades, but three Dauphines for a grand! Many of my car-freak friends in the Bay Area talked excitedly about buying them, but in the end, these now-rare French machines met a grim junkyard fate.

The Crusher awaits.

The "ruh-NALT" pronunciation was used by Renault USA for another decade or so.

Beep-beep! Wink-wink!

1959 Renault Dauphine in California wrecking yard.

Up to 40 miles to the gallon of gas.

1959 Renault Dauphine in California wrecking yard.

1959 Renault Dauphine in California wrecking yard.

1959 Renault Dauphine in California wrecking yard.

1959 Renault Dauphine in California wrecking yard.

1959 Renault Dauphine in California wrecking yard.

1959 Renault Dauphine in California wrecking yard.

1959 Renault Dauphine in California wrecking yard.

[Images: The author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 57 comments
  • Louis Faiella Louis Faiella on Nov 14, 2023

    When I was a kid....

    there was a newspaper delivery man who drove a Renault Dauphine. He tied the door latch open with light rope so it wouldnt close and got out of the car to deliver the papers to each house. But the great part was that he left it in neutral when he got out and he let it roll. After he delivered a few papers he retrieved the rolling car and went on to the next set of houses. It was quite the feat of timing!

  • Bill Bill on Feb 14, 2024

    Yes it had a water-cooled engine for a much better heater than a beetle, BUT --


    I had a 61, living in chilly Omaha. The engine, coolant and heater core are all in the back. The warm air (haha) was blown through a flattened insulation duct that ran under the car and then up into the front's heater inlets and defroster vents. If it was still warm by that time, and when it was REALLY COLD like it is in an Omaha winter, you might feel it. Otherwise you were scraping ice off the inside of the windshield and freezing your tail off.


    I'm surprised the one sitting in the junk yard hasn't rusted completely away by now. Mine was close to dissolving by the late 60s when I traded it in on a VW and got $25 for it. Actually I had to beg them to take it because I had nowhere to put it.

  • Bd2 Lexus has that crazy liquid mercury copper color which is quite unique. Everyone bashes on Lexus for making Toyota based Fwd vehicles and all but hey they have that copper.
  • Rochester I agree, people should be buying cars with color. But not purple. Never purple. Ewww.
  • Fred No idea why someone would interested in buying this at the price point. I'm pro-ev but a quick search can pull-up a lot more value at lower costs. I like the Fiat design but I couldn't stomach paying $37k for limited range and a super tight back seat.
  • 28-Cars-Later For the you-gotta-be-rich-to-afford-a-cheap-car crowd, Versa is the winner here IMO. Buy it new and pay the $300ish (?) note, but enjoy at least five years with relative reliability assuming historical average miles. Based on MY19, Manheim expects the "S" to be worth $5,975 in roughly five years with "retail" value being $12,650. Nissan and other second or third tier marques will give more on a new trade so assuming 20 OTD with incentives its a 12K/$2,400 depreciation over 5 years excluding interest and it probably could be kept another year or two before the Nissan in it starts to show. Mirage in this comparison is the new buy used on the cheap and run it till the wheels fall off. I'm loathe to compare it to either the Panther or 240 (since I don't believe it could physically last as long as either) but something in the vein of car you could repair yourself on the cheap which was originally intended for Third World conditions. Based on MY19, the ES hatch is worth $4K even with avg miles of 72,740 and "retail" value at $9,650. I personally see it as lot poison and could see savvy buyers making off with one of these near or below wholesale while Nissan is a staple of the subprime crowd and is much easier to finance. MC beings up an interesting contender in the used Chevy Bolt, whose wholesale is $12,050 for MY19 in LT trim with avg lower miles of 33,017. While this is very intriguing, financing is going to be the story here since Nissan or I imagine Mitsubishi could put buyers into half decent rates despite poor credit where a Bolt is "going to the street" and getting whatever high rate is being offered now. Assuming one can handle their own charging, Bolt does offer a lower maintenance cost and used I believe buyers have a higher chance of a white collar professional's commuter condition than what they will find in a used Nissan or Mitsu runabout. The risk to our theoretical buyer IMO is that the Bolt will straight up fail at some point in the future, either not take a charge or even turn on and for the higher wholesale entry point I say the Mitsu is a better choice since it likely won't completely fail and can very cheaply be replaced. Additional: For your kid/nephew/niece/any "middle class" child, I think Bolt is probably the better proposition here but I'd be out of the trade in 36 mos personally. For those truly on their own with no emergency support system, I'd shy away.
  • Jbltg It's interesting to note that in the Japan domestic market, where cars are built to order and dealers maintain barely any stock, that there are many, many color options. Really good ones, but no one seems to bite. Most of the cars on the road there are the same boring colors that we have. Go figure.My pet peeve is black interiors. Too depressing, and shows every speck of dust and dirt.
Next