Junkyard Find: 2007 Mini Cooper S

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The "New Mini" first appeared in North American showrooms as a 2002 model, as part of the turn-of-the-century wave of retro-styled machinery that included the Volkswagen New Beetle, Chrysler PT Cruiser and Chevrolet HHR. It took about a decade for the 21st-century Mini to begin showing up in car graveyards in large numbers, and they remain easy to find today. Here's an '07 Cooper S model in a Colorado yard.

When BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994, the original Mini (which began production by the British Motor Corporation in 1959) was still being built. The various BMC successors had tried and failed repeatedly to design a Mini successor over the decades, but it took a big stack of Deutschmarks (and, later on, Euros) to do the trick.

I know that the official name of this car's marque is spelled MINI in annoying all-caps letters, but I have adopted a policy of repairing make and model names that incorporate such maddening tricks as punctuation marks or all-uppercase/all-lowercase letters. That means I refuse to play the marketers' clever games with the Nissan LEAF, smart fortwo, Volkswagen up! and all the rest (FIAT is a tough one, since it started out as a legitimate acronym for Fabbrica Italiana Automobil di Torino, but the company itself ditched the all-caps spelling many years ago).

The MSRP for the regular 2007 Mini Cooper was $18,050, while the hot-rod Cooper S version listed at $21,850 (those prices come to $27,673 and $33,498 in 2024 dollars).

New for 2007 was this 1.6-liter turbocharged straight-four engine co-developed by Peugeot and BMW, replacing the supercharged Brazilian 1.6 and its Chrysler/Rover ancestry.

This engine was rated at 175 horsepower and 177 pound-feet.

A six-speed manual was standard equipment. A six-speed Steptronic automatic was available; unusually, the buyer of this car chose the three-pedal setup.

There were convertible versions of the Cooper and Cooper S available as well.

Mini dealers offered many add-on accessories, including these John Cooper Works sill plates. They didn't make this car a real JCW, but still looked cool.

Way back in 2009, a 24 Hours of Lemons team tried to get a 2005 Cooper S through the BS Inspection unscathed, earning 1,066 penalty laps in the process.

By about the middle 2010s, these cars began appearing en masse in the boneyards I frequent, so many that I thought about doing a Minipocalypse article on the subject (along the lines of the Subiepocalypse and 240calypse pieces I wrote for this publication).

Now, of course, Mini Coopers are seen competing in most 24 Hours of Lemons races. They're cheap, quick enough to be fun, and junkyard parts are plentiful. Their main drawback is poor reliability, a trait they share with Lemons cars made by Toyota, Audi, Subaru, Mitsubishi and Nissan (strangely, cheap Alfa Romeos are very reliable under punitive road-racing conditions).

You could do a lot worse than a Mini Cooper S as a cheap project car, thanks to their fell-off-a-cliff depreciation and vast parts availability.

There is a lot of room in here, huh?

From the "What could they have been thinking?" department.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

2007 Mini Cooper S in Colorado junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Apr 11, 2024

    German design and British assembly.....two wrongs don't make it right...think I'll pass!!! 🚗🚗🚗

  • Gayneu Gayneu on Apr 12, 2024

    I can comment on these. My wife always thought the Minis were "cute" so I bought her a used 2005 (non-S, 5 speed) for one of her "special" birthdays. She loved it and I kinda did too. Somehow a hole developed in the transmission case and the fluid drained out, ruining the car (too expensive to fix). A local mechanic bought it for $800.


    We then bought a used 2015 S (6 speed) which we still have today (80k miles). Her sister just bought a used S as well (also manual). It has been a dependable car but BMW-priced maintenance and premium gas hurts for sure. I think the earlier generation (like in the article) were better looking with cleaner lines. The 2015 S rides too stiff for me (Chicago roads) but is a hoot on smooth ones. It does seem to shift weird - its hard to describe but it shifts differently from every other manual I have driven. No matter how hard I try, so won't let go of her Mini.

  • Carsofchaos Styling is subjective, there are plenty of uglier cars out there (I'm looking at you, Lexus). But then again, I think 1958 Oldsmobiles are beautiful & have a man-crush on the Aztek, so I'm probably not the best person to ask if a car is good looking or not.
  • Zerofoo Any car with these types of mods has been run hard. Count on an engine rebuild on top of the ridiculous asking price.
  • Zerofoo I'm as interested in EVs as I am about my next washer and dryer set. Most are completely uninteresting and forgettable appliances.
  • Redapple2 Nice/Pluses[list][*]Armrest with raised island for cupholder / gear selector. Open Floorboard.[/*][*]Luxo cloth instead of leather.[/*][/list]Bad[list][*]No Carplay[/*][*]Black roof. Top 1/2 of car disappears.[/*][*]C to D pillar. What the hell is going on with the slashes on the glass?[/*][*]C pillar cut line make it impossible to get in the rear seat. FAIL.[/*][*]Rear style is a trainwreck. Upper and lower tail lamps. Sharply angled back light. Too much like Lyric whatever.[/*][*]Carbon fiber mimic looks like my friggin egg carton inside. [/*][/list]I dislike this car greatly.PS- the novelty of screen-heavy interiors have worn off at this point and will look dated far sooner than their more-analog counterparts.................... I never thought of this point. But, I think it is very true. Wise. Far Sighted.
  • Jalop1991 it looks like this car might be following the lead of the Prius in dictating to the buyers that "you don't need no stinkin' rear wiper", never mind that it's a freaking HATCHBACK.For reference, find a video about the Toyota digital rear view mirror--the video that shows it on the RAV. Note the part about how they specifically talk about how the rear wiper cleans up to that particular camera space on the rear window. Now ask yourself, what about the Prius? Nah. We'll sell you that feature, but it'll be useless unless you stop frequently to manually keep that area clear as you drive through the mountains in winter.Yeah, hatchbacks without wipers. They need higher MPG more than you need a wiper. What's next?But no worries; it does have the vaunted "Mondrian-patterned rear quarter-window graphic (that) fades to the rear, strengthening the fastback effect and low roofline".
Next