2023 Cadillac CT4 Review – The Cure for the Common Bimmer?

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Cadillac CT4 Premium Luxury Fast Facts

Powertrain
2.7-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (310 horsepower @ 5,500 RPM, 350 lb-ft of torque @ 1,500-4,000 RPM (with premium fuel))
Transmission/Drive Wheel Layout
10-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
21 city / 29 highway / 29 combined (EPA Rating)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
11.3 city / 8.1 highway / 9.9 combined (NRCan Rating)
Base Price
$38,995 (U.S.) / $53,234 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$53,215 (U.S.) / $60,234 (Canada)
Prices include $1,395 destination charge in the United States and $2,400 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

Last week I wrote about a BMW 3-Series that reminded me of Bimmers of the past, at least in terms of being fun to drive. I also pointed out that it was a relative bargain.

The 2023 Cadillac CT4 heard that and said “hold my beer.”


To be clear, this Caddy isn’t exactly as dynamically sound as the Bimmer. If I were about to spend the morning blasting a back road, I’d pick the BMW every time. But the Cadillac handles well enough to make me at least pause and think about it.

It doesn’t feel quite as light on its feet as the BMW, in part because all-wheel drive adds weight (this car is about 200 pounds more than the 3-Series I tested), but the CT4 is nonetheless a joy to put through its paces.

The 2.7-liter turbocharged four under the hood of my tester (310 horsepower, 350 lb-ft of torque with premium fuel) certainly helps. This car has enough grunt to keep up in traffic.

And it has the handling dialed in well enough that you’ll have fun. Again, other sport-luxury sedans are a bit better, but this Caddy is no slouch. It’s a bit of a sleeper choice, to be sure, but it’s good enough when the road turns curvy that you’ll be in a good mood when you park.

There’s not a huge ride trade-off, either. Yes, this car is on the stiff side, especially on broken pavement, but it’s tolerable.

On the negative side of the ledger, the steering is a bit too artificial in feel. At least the 10-speed automatic is seen and not felt.

Where the CT4 falls a bit short has more to do with creature comfort than driving dynamics. The interior materials below the beltline feel too chintzy for a car that stickers for over $50K, and the cabin just doesn’t feel special enough to earn the Cadillac badge. Also, as with the 3-Series, I found the CT4’s interior quarters to be a little cramped, especially in the rear.

I continue to be confounded by Cadillac's choice to shoehorn an infotainment screen onto the top of the center stack.

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention SuperCruise – though my experience with it was limited compared to another test later. The semi-autonomous, hands-free system generally worked without issue, though a poorly-painted exit ramp off Chicago’s famed Lake Shore Drive confused it and required me to take back over. The system is easy to activate and use, though I can never fully relax using these systems – I am always ready to take over.

SuperCruise adds a huge chunk to the MSRP -- $7,700 for the package, which also includes navigation, Bose audio, a climate package, and a technology package. Oh, and it requires a subscription. All-wheel drive adds another $2,000 and the 2.7 turbo costs $2,500. Take away SuperCruise and all-wheel drive, and the CT4 could be a bargain competitor to the BMW. Instead, this car cost $2K more.

Comparisons to BMW aside, the base price of $38,995* gets you 18-inch wheels, performance suspension, satellite radio, remote start, dual-zone climate control, LED headlamps and taillamps, keyless entry and starting, leather seats, wireless cell phone charging, and adaptive cruise control.

*The pricing here is confusing. My test car’s Monroney had a base of $38,995, but the online configurator lists a Premium Luxury – my tester’s trim – at $47,790 before destination. That’s with AWD and the 2.7-liter engine, which were listed as options on the Monroney.

Safety aids include forward-collision alert, front-pedestrian braking, front and rear park assist, teen driver software, enhanced automatic emergency braking, lane-change alert with side blind-zone alert, following-distance indicator, and rear cross-traffic alert.

Fuel economy is listed as 21/29/24. A respectable highway number, at least.

I like the CT4 a lot as a sleeper alternative to the BMWs and Audis of the world, though it can’t win on value unless you skip SuperCruise and all-wheel drive. The BMW is a better car for performance driving, but the Cadillac is right there in the conversation.

Moving away from comparisons and evaluating the CT4 in a vacuum, you find that if you can overlook some flaws in terms of interior-material quality and lack of space, you’ll find that it’s plenty engaging to drive. It’s a quality entrant in the compact luxury/sport sedan space. It won’t sway you away from the BWM showroom – at least, not equipped as my test car was – but it will, on its own merits, be a satisfying sedan.

To answer the question posed by the headline, this car is not the cure for the common BMW. And that is OK – it doesn’t have to be. It just has to be a very good Cadillac.

Which it mostly is. A nicer interior would be appreciated, but the car’s performance lets us forgive those sins.

The CT4 is in the conversation, and that might just be enough.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 80 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on Aug 17, 2023

    Pretty good review. Told me enough to read between the lines, and not bother looking at Cadillacs. The 2014 ATS was no match for my 08 Legacy GT when I test drove it. The ATS interior was also meh then.and hasn't improved.


    Don't know if Genesis has bothered to stick their 2.5T engine in the G70. The 2.0t sucked big time when I drove one four years ago, as did the tranny. And the interior was lovely. The back seat however was worse than any other sedan of the nominal size. The road noise from the rear tires dominated the noise the driver heard. Saying this as my brother got a '23 2.5t GV70 and all my criticisms of the G70 were gone. However, it's no handler, merely competent. The interior is still amazing.


    Not a BMW or Audi fan, and Cadillac CT4 is obviously useless for the money. Not much left in the sedan field, so you can ignore my advice like my pal did and buy a squeaky rattling Kia Stinger V6, a cheapo extended wheelbase G70. Didn't even check that the Stinger is discontinued for '24. No wonder it was the only new Kia sitting on the lot. Everyone else at least read the write-ups.


    Finally a few Tesla 3's around here. Joke interior, and the word is the suspension is useless on our frost-heaved roads, Never settles. VoGhost lives in lala land. A cheap tin box isn't a premium car, and California roads don't exist here. Go charge yoursel Superly.

  • E E on Mar 06, 2024

    Seems rather odd to compare the CT4 Premium Luxury to the 3 series since it’s designed to compete with the 228 gran coupe.


    The CT4-V RWD has a sportier suspension tune and Magneride dampers so it would compare more favorably to the 3 series and the CT4-V Blackwing is a proper match to the M3.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next