Abandoned History: The 2014 VIA VTRUX Pickup, a Forgotten Silverado

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

A brief moment in EV history passed us by about a decade ago, when the little-known VIA Motors introduced their lineup of VTRUX hybrid-electric vehicles. Your author managed to hear absolutely nothing about this brand or its vehicles until a post on Twit-X a couple of weeks ago. This sort of topic is the very reason Abandoned History exists. Let’s learn about the world of VTRUX.

The story begins with a company in Utah called Raser Technologies. In 2009 Raser displayed a Hummer H3 that claimed to return up to 100 miles* on a gallon of fuel (*in local daily driving) when it was outfitted with the company’s range-extender plug-in electric powertrain. Raser went looking for investors and executives, and someone to mass produce their powertrains.


Enter newly retired GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz. Lutz brought with him other investors, as well as executives and engineers from GM. In short order, VIA Motors was established as a separate entity from Raser Technologies in 2010. Lutz joined in 2011, promptly after he retired from GM. The newly established company planned to introduce a whole line of PHEV vehicles, and their industry connection for completed passenger vehicles to convert (Lutz) was already in place.

Lutz was a staunch supporter of GM’s plug-in hybrid of the time, the Cruze-based Volt. The same basic principle was used by the VIA powertrain, and would electrify current General Motors vehicles. VIA saw an opportunity to capitalize on a new electrified vehicle market, while simultaneously taking advantage of proven Chevrolet underpinnings. 


To that end, the VTRUX line was announced circa 2011. Each vehicle would use the VIA plug-in powertrain which turned the existing gas engine into a range extender. Different to the Volt’s operation, all VTRUX models were a series hybrid: There was no mechanical connection between the gas engine and the wheels. That’s different to today’s PHEV models, where the gasoline and electric engines work together to power the vehicle as needed, while the gasoline engine also charges the batteries. 

The V6 or V8 engine operated only as a generator to supply electricity to the electric drive unit once batteries were empty. The traditional transmission in each vehicle was removed, and the space used for batteries. No matter whether there was a large V6 or V8 at the front, power was provided solely by the 402-horse electric motor which managed a respectable 306 lb-ft of torque. 

VIA said its vehicles would accelerate to 60 miles per hour in a generally unimpressive 9.7 seconds, and on to a top speed of only 85. VTRUX trucks (Silverados) were claimed to manage 25 miles per gallon combined. The VTRUX van (Express) was said to meet 30 miles per gallon. Both these figures pertained to the times when the battery was depleted and the engine kicked on to restore power. In theory the vehicles would be charged often to minimize the gasoline used by the engine. 


And the batteries would definitely need charged often, as the VTRUX line was claimed to have around a 35-mile range on battery power. When combined with the greater MPG achieved running the gasoline engine to support the electric motor, VTRUX models achieved a total mileage range similar to the standard gasoline versions. 

An additional benefit of the electrified VTRUX models were their electrical outlets. The trucks could power tools on a job site with standard 120- and 240-volt outlets. Said power was drawn from the 24 kWh battery. It was estimated that charging up the batteries would take around four hours.

Ditching a transmission and partial operation on electric power alone were the selling points for the VTRUX line. VIA was focused on fleet sales and a low cost of ownership. The math worked out (per VIA) that after eight years of use, fleet customers would save roughly a third on ownership costs. Things like fuel and maintenance costs were much less with the VTRUX setup.

For the conversion from Chevrolet to VTRUX branding, VIA took off the exterior Chevrolet logos and applied their stylized VIA and VTRUX badging. On test models there were also some very large “ELECTRIFIED” wrap graphics along the side. VTRUX often wore VIA center caps on their various wheel designs.

Interior changes were very limited, as VIA did not develop their own airbag cover or replace other interior badging. The gauge cluster was modified as VIA removed the rev counter and replaced it with a power indicator to show the vehicle’s current mode along with battery charge, temp, and kW indicators (in the wrong font). The rest of the interior was standard Chevrolet.

The first model to go on sale in late 2013 was the VTRUX van, an Express 2500 equipped with the 4.8-liter V8. In 2014 the truck was launched on the new Silverado 2500 platform which utilized a 4.3-liter V6. VIA had plans for a third VTRUX model too, the so-called “Presidential SUV.” 

Pictured in marketing materials, it was planned to use the Vortec 5.3-liter V8 and the Suburban 2500 body. But GM dropped the Suburban 2500 line after 2014, so VTRUX offerings were limited to two models. The company was more focused on the Silverado variant, and offered it in two- and four-wheel drive, and single and extended cab variants. The first to go on sale was the four-wheel drive crew cab. 

Given the value proposition, saving ⅓ on maintenance over eight full years, one might have expected the purchase cost to be a third more than a regular 2500 truck or van. But no, VIA needed to charge twice as much as a conventional vehicle to turn a profit. In 2014, that meant a $38,050 ($49,946 adj.) WT 4WD Crew Cab trim was $76,100 ($99,893 adj.). A fleet manager attempting to explain why vehicle budgeting for the upcoming year suddenly doubled must have made for a difficult meeting.


To that end, the VTRUX did not prove very popular. After a short media blitz in 2013 showing prototypes on old generation GM trucks and some light coverage in 2014, it seems VIA discontinued their PHEV VTRUX line in short order (2015). While they focused primarily on 2500 vans and trucks in WT specification, there were other examples specially ordered, like the Silverado 1500 Z71 shown.

VIA changed tack immediately after their PHEV failure, and began work on an all-electric VTRUX line with a proprietary skateboard architecture. Presently, they do not acknowledge their first generation of VTRUX on their website, which reads as though the current EV venture is their starting point. If you’re interested in what VIA is up to today we can certainly talk about that in another installment, but that’s up to you. Until then!


[Images: Raser Technologies, VIA Motors, Seller


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • CanadaCraig First I'll answer the question. YES. Toyota, Mazda and Subaru are doing the right thing. That said... If only those pushing for an all EV world would care as much about the 1 BILLION earthlings that make less than $1 a day.
  • Redapple2 All this BEV investment. A bigger impact (less oil consumption) would have been made if we had made PIG UP trucks smaller since 2000 and not HUGEr. (And raised gas tax by $2-3/gallon.)
  • ChristianWimmer One of my clients is a company that is actually producing eFuels in Leipzig. Yes, they require a lot of energy to produce but this would not be an issue if Germany had nuclear energy or used the excess energy from wind and solar to produce these fuels. In such a scenario the energy losses wouldn’t really matter.Also, I am told that nations like Spain or the North African nations like Morocco or Tunisia could be ideal places to produce eFuels/Hydrogen due to their abundance of solar power. Again, the energy loses here would not matter since the energy used to produce these fuels is essentially “free”. If this path were pursued, Morocco and Tunisia could become wealthy nations and exporters of eFuels and Hydrogen. Countries with an abundance of solar or wind or hydro energy could be producing eFuels for their domestic consumption and export.Another argument which to me is irrelevant these days ist the poor thermal efficiency of ICE engines (25-35% gasoline, 40-45% diesel). One long trips with cruise control set to 130 km/h and even the occasional venture into the 180-200 km/h zone, my fully loaded (with my gear) A250 (2.0 4-cylinder 224-hp Turbo) can achieve an impressive gas mileage of 6 L / 100 km. That’s phenomenal - I am looking at six 1 liter bottles of water right now and that’s all my car needs to travel 100 km… amazing.So, I am a supporter of eFuels. I love internal combustion engines and if we want to use them in a climate neural way, then eFuels are a must. Also, to me every ICE car is way more sustainable and longer-lasting an an EV. Mazda, Toyota etc. are making the right move IMO.
  • Blueice Once you infuse governmental unit regulation & [marketing] and taxpayerfunding, one knows quite well, dat the product or service isdestine to fail; which includes battery vehicles. Just axe yourself how revolutionary have your home batterydevices become ??? I am still waiting. after three decades, for a battery shaver whichonly requires charging two or three times per year.I am glad that I do not have a plug in Frau.
  • Tassos Such a heavy breadvan on stilts, with so much HP, AND with ONLY 100 KWH Battery, I doubt if you will ever see 250 miles, let alone 300, under the best of conditions. In the winter, count on 150 miles range.And NO, it looks TERRIBLE. The only SUV that looks great is the RANGE ROVER.
Next