White House Vows to Investigate Security Risks Posed by Foreign-Connected Vehicle Tech

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Thursday, the Biden administration announced plans to investigate the potential national security risks being confronted by American automakers and any threats posed by connected vehicle technologies controlled by foreign adversaries — including China.


With the issue having been front-and-center in the minds of legislators and industry groups for months, the White House is reportedly taking action regarding China’s determination “to dominate the future of the auto market.”

The relevant press release from the Biden administration stipulates that China may rely on “unfair practices” and policies that could “flood our market with its vehicles, posing risks to our national security.”


From the White House:


Most cars these days are “connected” – they are like smart phones on wheels. These cars are connected to our phones, to navigation systems, to critical infrastructure, and to the companies that made them. Connected vehicles from China could collect sensitive data about our citizens and our infrastructure and send this data back to the People’s Republic of China. These vehicles could be remotely accessed or disabled.
China imposes restrictions on American autos and other foreign autos operating in China. Why should connected vehicles from China be allowed to operate in our country without safeguards?
So today, I am announcing unprecedented actions to ensure that cars on U.S. roads from countries of concern like China do not undermine our national security. I have directed my Secretary of Commerce to conduct an investigation into connected vehicles with technology from countries of concern and to take action to respond to the risks.


The Chinese government has conducted similar investigations into American brands. Tesla vehicles were once prohibited from parking at military bases after concerns were raised that their exterior cameras and permanent connectivity features allowed for data harvesting that could be used to help the United States spy.


As previously reported, China’s BYD is likewise plotting a course to establish a facility in Mexico that would build all-electric passenger vehicles. This has sent various legislators and industry groups into a tizzy, though the United States has been introducing prospective policy changes to bar the Chinese from getting too comfortable within the automotive and energy sectors — at least those operating within the confines of North America.


China has long taken similar efforts to do the same to American brands vying to operate within its borders. While foreign automotive brands are relatively common in the Asian country these days, the Chinese government has historically forced all outside entities into creating joint ventures with domestic brands in order to do business. Despite China and the United States having a massive trade relationship, there remains a massive trade deficit that advantages China.


In 2022, the U.S. goods and services trade deficit with China was over $367 billion. Though some would argue this is the result of the United States spending decades offshoring production and becoming dependent upon foreign entities to provide goods associated with entire business sectors (e.g. medicine, textiles, home electronics, etc). It’s worth noting that the industries that the U.S. government seems particularly concerned with are those that remain influential on the domestic market — most notably energy and automotive.


Biden promised that he would "do right by autoworkers and middle-class families" dependent upon the continued existence of domestic labor. He also said the government would take additional actions to ensure the future of the automotive industry would be made in America, adding that connected vehicles from China could collect sensitive data about U.S. citizens and infrastructure. However, nothing was said about the data harvesting used by domestic companies which many (including your author) have said are completely unacceptable invasions of privacy. The same seems to go for foreign-owned brands that have been deemed friendly by the U.S. government.


[Image: The White House]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 73 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Mar 01, 2024


    "White House Vows to Investigate Security Risks Posed by Foreign-Connected Vehicle Tech"

    LOL, dem furriners are stealing our information!!!! It's funny how implied bigotry can be deployed by the same people who decry it. Then again Biden is mostly celery, so who knows which of his handlers/night nurses typed this up and hit send.


    Just once I want to see him type one of these releases with all of his infamous verbal diarrhea and rambling and have it end with just a pool of slobber at the bottom of the page. Like he left it on the kitchen counter and Dr. Jill Biden accidentally left a pile of potato chips on it.

  • Are you dumb enough to let the car connect ? .. well then you deserve it.


    But then again your cell phone is way way way way WAY worse than your car trying to snoop other access points and devices near by. And of in reality The US intelligence agency literally kills people using data brokers soooo... china is not the only one in the room abusing mobile tech

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next